Ibn Taymiyya's gruesome misstep led to his inverted definition of the concept of worship (2020-08-08) #

0:00:00 Music
0:00:28 so we have just one question
0:00:29 today so which other scholar has so far
0:00:32 been able to point out
0:00:34 even tamiya's mistake of separating
0:00:36 actions from the burden
0:00:42 of action
0:01:00 he did not understand this is all
0:01:02 meaning just acknowledge me as the only
0:01:03 sovereign
0:01:06 so he he thought these these these
0:01:08 various actions are a bad and
0:01:10 and they are primary and then divine
0:01:12 being became the the
0:01:13 thing which is worshipped every time you
0:01:15 smile that you say the things which is
0:01:16 worthy of worshiping
0:01:17 so making the worship and acts of
0:01:20 worship the primary one
0:01:21 instead of that the divine being is the
0:01:23 entity which is
0:01:25 supranational who can act with free will
0:01:27 which you have with absolute power
0:01:29 nobody can but if you undermine his his
0:01:32 will
0:01:33 who he is the only one who controls
0:01:34 himself that's a divine being
0:01:36 there's no mention of creation normally
0:01:38 should we burden
0:01:41 the entity which has these attributes he
0:01:43 will understood allah is the one which
0:01:45 is being worshipped already
0:01:46 all of them are wrong that's what we
0:01:48 discussed extensively in the second part
0:01:50 of the book
0:01:50 which is being translated extensively
0:01:53 very extensively in all details with
0:01:54 every ayah with every
0:01:56 sentence and equating certain sentences
0:01:58 to other things and
0:01:59 deducing mathematical level precision of
0:02:01 equations
0:02:02 so that's even the most mistake uh the
0:02:05 people
0:02:06 got got stuck with the division of
0:02:08 taheed into this
0:02:09 division etcetera is it wrong nothing
0:02:11 definitely is wrong but some people
0:02:13 exposed that the division is wrong
0:02:16 because even the
0:02:17 the naming of them he meant that there
0:02:20 is wrong that's not right
0:02:22 right there there's only one supreme one
0:02:23 ultimate seven one lawmaker because it's
0:02:25 the meaning of
0:02:26 so he confused reverse the meaning
0:02:29 use for example when he discussed the
0:02:31 unity of the divine being
0:02:33 the one who can create and so on the eye
0:02:34 of uh
0:02:46 category of the divine being that's the
0:02:48 offspring of a divine being
0:02:50 or an entity which can create
0:02:53 and take his creation for himself and go
0:02:54 away
0:02:57 and the quran says clearly if that's
0:02:59 true then every
0:03:00 the divine being will have several
0:03:03 divine beasts that everyone will take
0:03:04 his creation go away but this is not
0:03:06 enough this by necessity
0:03:07 one must do not donate there's no way
0:03:10 and people say how can you take your
0:03:11 creation go away i want them to have to
0:03:13 with me by necessity because it's a
0:03:15 complete a complete cause of creation
0:03:17 so they will be done the conflict of the
0:03:19 causes which are perfect causes if
0:03:21 they are contingent and not perfect
0:03:23 cause no problem cooperation correlation
0:03:24 is necessary
0:03:25 but in the case of perfect cause
0:03:27 cooperation concept is impossible it
0:03:29 doesn't work
0:03:30 so then one will dominate the others but
0:03:32 we in the universe we don't see it like
0:03:33 there was this one
0:03:34 clearly well established well organized
0:03:36 according to one law so this is
0:03:38 impossible
0:03:39 uh so uh in that in all the in that that
0:03:43 the word is used and we when he expanded
0:03:45 that in a very
0:03:46 logical and uh beautiful expansion he
0:03:49 substituted
0:03:51 everywhere which is which is a blatant
0:03:54 uh a blatant mistake beloved error not
0:03:57 acceptable it's almost
0:03:59 almost telling allah that you have used
0:04:01 the wrong word almost
0:04:02 so almost bordering on that he didn't
0:04:04 intend to do that but
0:04:06 because he was so obsessed with his
0:04:08 definition of
0:04:09 that he he even read the quran upside
0:04:12 down
0:04:13 he said the quran
0:04:17 he should have said so my definition
0:04:20 must be wrong i must go back instead he
0:04:22 put his definition and
0:04:23 on top of the quran based on some
0:04:26 historic evidence mr osama hadid it
0:04:29 can't be the quran must be the dominant
0:04:30 one
0:04:31 and not the hadith
0:04:34 so that's so nobody pointed that in that
0:04:36 way in that sense but some people
0:04:38 pointed that this division is not
0:04:40 it's not proper it has weaknesses the
0:04:42 definition of ibadah as
0:04:44 as as they mentioned as acts is also
0:04:46 wrong is not persuasive
0:04:47 but also the definition which uh a
0:04:50 recent scholar who died very recently
0:04:52 recently like maybe 50 years ago i think
0:04:55 i remember i saw him at my grandfather's
0:04:58 seclusion room in the maki
0:05:01 but i remember seeing him faintly i'm
0:05:03 not sure if it's
0:05:05 a very one of the best
0:05:08 pseudo-ahabi but he is more
0:05:12 qualified and meticulous than most
0:05:14 wahabi the people do not know him very
0:05:16 much as well
0:05:19 he wrote about 600 pages a
0:05:22 huge book called trying to
0:05:25 explain and develop
0:05:29 and he took the wrong way for example he
0:05:30 discussed alibaba in the community
0:05:32 and what he takes a very narration
0:05:34 whatever so on
0:05:42 and this is from us not from the prophet
0:05:44 how do we know that knew that's exactly
0:05:46 what was happening beside it was
0:05:47 misunderstood then he went to a people
0:05:50 of hoot
0:05:50 and so on and he came to 600 pages and
0:05:53 ultimately he did not
0:05:54 end in any the definition of verbatim
0:05:56 which is which
0:05:58 uh which makes any in any solid sense
0:06:00 under a counter example to it
0:06:04 because the definition is wrong because
0:06:06 it is attempt to give about us something
0:06:08 independent for the concept of illah
0:06:10 it's not possible
0:06:14 when we say we worship allah or whether
0:06:17 the hindus say we worship shiva
0:06:19 that's what we mean to a divine entity
0:06:21 it has to be a divine divinity must be
0:06:23 defined before
0:06:25 but because the people only say we we
0:06:27 worship this divine being and the jewish
0:06:28 the things worship etc so it looks like
0:06:30 circle it's not circular it appears
0:06:32 circular
0:06:33 it becomes circular only when you try to
0:06:34 make the a
0:06:36 by the independent from the divinity
0:06:39 the moment you recognize that then you
0:06:41 will not fall into circularity and then
0:06:42 the definition will be clear
0:06:44 abadda will be 11 to recognize me as the
0:06:48 only
0:06:49 lord and sumarian the only divine entity
0:06:51 there is no other divine except me
0:06:53 unless there is worshiping allah by
0:06:55 definition must be
0:06:57 into hate if you worship anyone beside
0:06:59 allah then you are not wahed and
0:07:06 you don't recognize him as this is the
0:07:09 only sovereign lord if you don't
0:07:11 recognize that there's nothing
0:07:12 your mother is gone so i
0:07:16 share with anybody uh a sovereignty it's
0:07:19 not possible
0:07:19 by the way the benefits of reason is not
0:07:22 possible
0:07:24 ever impossible ever and also the
0:07:26 various counter examples
0:07:32 okay how come that the yusuf and the
0:07:34 family of yusuf means
0:07:35 you to him
0:07:44 so it's impossible allah cannot command
0:07:45 something which is just your reason
0:07:47 relates his divinity is impossible
0:07:51 so it can't be so worshipping
0:07:54 it's not even act of a bad could be act
0:07:56 of respect
0:07:57 could be a close support to strengthen
0:07:59 the dark matter whatever it is but it's
0:08:00 not imbalance
0:08:01 only if it is done to a divine being
0:08:03 some things you believe is reminding
0:08:04 is an act of worship to this divine
0:08:06 being expression of your
0:08:08 of your acknowledging over the of
0:08:10 divinity
0:08:16 itself so they can watch various deities
0:08:19 but if you watch of allah it's
0:08:20 impossible to achieve anybody else
0:08:22 because it has to entail the
0:08:24 unity of the divine by necessity if it's
0:08:26 not then it's not not worshipping
0:08:27 so the ones who say we worship allah and
0:08:29 worship for example uh
0:08:31 another entity they are not worshipping
0:08:33 allah they are
0:08:34 they are muslim they are definitely
0:08:35 allah and their worship is invalid
0:08:39 has no value because worship is the only
0:08:42 and ultimate sovereign
0:08:45 including the other divine attributes
0:08:46 what is the peak of divine attributes
0:08:47 the peak of the
0:08:48 top peak of the island is is
0:08:51 sovereignty not opposite so when when
0:08:55 some
0:08:55 medical we have books
0:09:00 which shows that the people are mentally
0:09:05 mentally sick
0:09:36 assembly assembly absorpt is simply
0:09:39 refuted by all these
0:09:40 these these evidences even in in
0:09:42 particular like
0:09:43 how come that the people of yusuf made
0:09:46 sujud to him
0:09:47 uh and one of them is a prophet his
0:09:49 father himself is a prophet soul
0:09:50 so he must commit an actor this way his
0:09:53 mouth was
0:09:53 no no because it's allowed by allah so
0:09:55 how come that that worshipping we say
0:09:57 someone said elijah is allowed
0:09:58 no it's not exactly nothing but it's
0:10:00 something else so if you do this
0:10:02 unless another consideration what's the
0:10:04 other consideration with their mother
0:10:05 the same with boy
0:10:07 how come when japanese beat each other
0:10:09 they usually they don't shake hands they
0:10:11 just bow
0:10:12 is that boring they're bad and with
0:10:13 respect but you look like requests
0:10:16 sometimes just take the
0:10:30 as a divine being so divinity must be
0:10:33 ahead
0:10:34 first and foremost divine or divinity
0:10:36 what's the meaning of divine
0:10:39 when that's settled and this
0:10:42 established that there's only one divine
0:10:43 being the only one and only allah
0:10:46 if anybody which is only one otherwise
0:10:50 it's a dead
0:10:51 non-divine blind death
0:10:54 dead mother called you called nature or
0:10:56 called mataro or whatever you call it
0:10:58 this will be atheism that's the only
0:11:01 possible possibility of reasons
0:11:02 everything is not there it is not
0:11:04 possible
0:11:10 clearly is
0:11:15 until you settle the definition of
0:11:16 divinity and the fundamental issue of
0:11:18 creation who created
0:11:20 who is this the sovereign who is the
0:11:21 only sovereign by the s
0:11:41 what do i do she actually worship use
0:11:42 order nothing only one comment
0:11:45 don't touch this three that's it go
0:11:47 around do whatever you want
0:11:49 except this one tree just one comma it's
0:11:51 not even bowing or stretching or
0:11:53 or kissing walls or nothing and it's
0:11:57 almost certain that they were not
0:11:58 ordered to to to have record or
0:12:00 anything maybe later we don't know
0:12:01 anyway there's nothing in the quran
0:12:03 evidence there's nothing
0:12:04 we are no order given to adam except
0:12:06 except this one
0:12:07 don't eat from this one sweet victory
0:12:09 that's the only the she had the only
0:12:10 command the only law he had nothing else
0:12:20 he was nothing he was not a habit he was
0:12:23 mushrik he was not he was differently
0:12:24 among
0:12:24 this he was he was movement that was
0:12:27 enough that's all that he had
0:12:28 but it was enough and even that he could
0:12:30 not fulfill for whatever
0:12:32 reason and weakness but but that's it
0:12:35 that's what has happened
0:12:38 so he was a habit he had the full ibadah
0:12:42 because he acknowledged his lord
0:12:44 and he knew that he was mistaken we have
0:12:46 committed a mistake
0:12:48 we have done injustice and we wronged
0:12:49 ourselves when we listen to the
0:12:52 devil's whispering so we ask for
0:12:55 forgiveness
0:12:56 acknowledging that he transitions with
0:12:58 the order of the lord
0:12:59 not like him he did not please refused
0:13:03 i am suffering too you are not only
0:13:05 sorry i am civilian with you
0:13:08 so became kafir and stuck with mushrik
0:13:11 because of arrogance for declaring
0:13:12 himself to be
0:13:14 able to seek out guess what allah
0:13:16 commands nobody can secure
0:13:17 allah commands it's impossible this will
0:13:20 under my reason we'll discuss that when
0:13:22 we come to these things more detail
0:13:23 it will not only it will admire my
0:13:25 sharia for my reason
0:13:27 because reason will be will be then
0:13:28 destroyed completely
0:13:33 that the ultimate rational being can be
0:13:35 questioned by a lower
0:13:37 secondary being that's impossible the
0:13:40 lower secondary being could not have
0:13:41 been possibly being being rational
0:13:43 without the other ultimate creator
0:13:46 giving him this rationality so if thus
0:13:48 financiality is rational and good
0:13:50 then should be acknowledged that the
0:13:51 supreme one is the most rational
0:13:53 and must be the haqq whatever his
0:13:55 motivation and intention
0:13:56 is you don't need to know that but you
0:13:58 know the fundamental and his
0:13:59 of absolute perfect and absolutely
0:14:01 infallible
0:14:03 so it must be hack and absolute help you
0:14:06 must be wrong
0:14:07 by necessity of reason otherwise there
0:14:08 is no collapse and if your reason is
0:14:11 wrong
0:14:12 and your brain is misconstructed and
0:14:15 miswired
0:14:17 then for theory how can you trust them
0:14:18 as well but we know that the brain
0:14:20 cannot be misuad
0:14:21 it cannot be having like the pentium 4
0:14:23 which intel we saw heard
0:14:26 in some calculations it was a scandal in
0:14:28 the 90s that cannot cannot happen
0:14:30 there's not yeah some brains are miss
0:14:32 one some you are mental but they are
0:14:34 excluded from
0:14:35 accountability in in your qiyam and that
0:14:37 they have in the universe because
0:14:38 no no no created contingent being can be
0:14:41 perfect by necessity
0:14:42 they will must be in the creation there
0:14:44 must be some deficiencies and allah
0:14:46 legislated for that how to deal and how
0:14:48 know how to deal with that in the
0:14:49 universe and sometimes you show you
0:14:50 allah's power
0:14:51 and show you that you are contingent and
0:14:52 limited
0:14:55 but even but if you are really not not
0:14:57 one of these mentally drained
0:14:59 then you cannot by necessity assuming
0:15:00 that your reason is right and the
0:15:02 creator of this your reason
0:15:03 can be wrong who is absolute and perfect
0:15:06 is ancestry existing so his reason is
0:15:08 ultimate and rational
0:15:09 he cannot be arrested ever you can be
0:15:12 you can't fall into rationality because
0:15:15 you are contingent you are finite but
0:15:16 the infinite one is impossible
0:15:18 because necessarily existing because
0:15:20 everything she has an attribute it has
0:15:21 it in
0:15:22 its fullest absolutely complete perfect
0:15:26 way or it has no attribute if an
0:15:27 attribute is not befitting for a
0:15:29 necessary existing being then he doesn't
0:15:31 have that activity either zero or
0:15:32 infinity attributes are either zero he
0:15:34 doesn't have it or he has an infinite
0:15:36 and complete and unlimited uh
0:15:39 capacity so so if reason dictate that
0:15:44 then questioning allah will under my
0:15:46 reason
0:15:48 allah says
0:15:51 he is not questioning what he does
0:16:01 impossible otherwise if the necessarily
0:16:03 existing
0:16:04 free agent ultimate being necessarily
0:16:07 existing can be
0:16:08 questioned meaning reason itself can't
0:16:10 be questioned but then these are all
0:16:12 collapsed
0:16:13 collapse then the whole construct of of
0:16:15 the universe understanding of the
0:16:16 universe that's being created not
0:16:18 created or collapsed
0:16:18 we don't know what's going on then we're
0:16:20 like we're like in a mental house
0:16:22 obviously if someone's come to a
0:16:24 situation he would be like in a state of
0:16:26 suspense
0:16:27 and like like a sick person for some
0:16:29 time until he comes concluding and
0:16:30 conclude like the cut
0:16:32 unlike that that's impossible
0:16:35 at least my basic rationality and my
0:16:37 spirit recognition that i exist and i am
0:16:38 limited
0:16:39 is true that's the fundamental point and
0:16:41 from there you build again
0:16:42 and you are back to the necessity of
0:16:43 reason
0:16:46 so allah cannot be questioned
0:16:49 uh injunctions can can be put in a
0:16:52 matter of
0:16:53 discussion anyone questioning allah
0:16:55 judgment or ruling
0:16:57 is is necessarily undermining reason or
0:17:01 just playing games proclaiming that he
0:17:04 believes in allah and he doesn't believe
0:17:05 or he doesn't
0:17:06 does did not understand what is the
0:17:08 meaning of allah
0:17:12 they did not give to allah though with
0:17:14 the respect he deserved
0:17:16 that whole universe in his hand
0:17:19 and he controls everything it can't be
0:17:21 otherwise
0:17:23 so so that's that's the mistake i think
0:17:26 every time he went and
0:17:27 he was possibly offended by some sophie
0:17:31 actions which we find undesirable or
0:17:33 extreme
0:17:34 at graves and things like that and
0:17:37 somehow he came to the conclusion that
0:17:38 his shirk
0:17:41 or a type of minor circle should not be
0:17:43 done this way for
0:17:44 whatever reason maybe the considerations
0:17:45 correct in certain acts
0:17:48 even not necessary in all acts and then
0:17:50 from there he
0:17:51 concluded and developed and so on to at
0:17:53 an attempt to undermine that and stop it
0:17:56 and that's that's that's the problem
0:17:58 when you when you deduce things
0:17:59 related to fundamental vision of the
0:18:01 universe and attribute to allah and how
0:18:03 you relate it to grievous
0:18:04 by letting your desire to a certain
0:18:07 conclusion guide you no
0:18:09 it should be what is the what is there
0:18:11 how it works
0:18:12 how it is interrelated by the system
0:18:14 reason what is the result what's the
0:18:15 conclusion that will come by itself
0:18:17 in a good in a in its good time so this
0:18:20 is this is uh
0:18:22 this is the same problem if you do for
0:18:23 example a scientific experiment to
0:18:24 refuse something or prove something
0:18:27 you ultimately did not do not come to
0:18:29 the correct result because you are
0:18:31 moved by certain desire it has to be
0:18:33 done neutrally
0:18:35 and that's the reason for the medical
0:18:37 science put great weight on these
0:18:39 placebo-controlled double-blinded
0:18:41 experiments but
0:18:42 they put overweight on that for some
0:18:44 reason can be discussed otherwise
0:18:46 but to neutralize any desire of of a
0:18:49 good result or a bad result and
0:18:51 it neutralized the feeling of the
0:18:53 experimenter and also the one who
0:18:54 received the medication for example
0:18:57 he tried to originalize all that and go
0:18:59 out of it because this desire and this
0:19:01 this uh this willingness to have a
0:19:04 result or to the furry future that could
0:19:06 undermine
0:19:07 um and still still the devil is in the
0:19:10 detail for example if
0:19:11 the sign of excellent is bad like for
0:19:13 example this and let's just let's
0:19:14 mention that casually before we close
0:19:15 conclude
0:19:16 there isn't controversy about
0:19:18 heterozygous
0:19:20 and now now trump despite the voice
0:19:23 stupidity adopted that
0:19:24 he went maybe overbought but because
0:19:26 political opposition and this because he
0:19:28 is confront
0:19:28 confrontation with the medical
0:19:30 establishment in america which is
0:19:31 definitely has become like a cherishing
0:19:33 oppressive church
0:19:35 they did some experimentation i am
0:19:36 doubtful about that experimentation
0:19:38 or that clinical trial has been done
0:19:41 done in a clean way and well designed
0:19:42 for example
0:19:43 everyone knows this is the education
0:19:44 which is well known now for how many
0:19:46 years
0:19:46 30 40 years for malaria and so on and we
0:19:49 know
0:19:49 i think well established since the 80s
0:19:51 that there have been death cases where
0:19:53 this for these people who harvest
0:19:55 certain or heart condition especially
0:19:57 special certain other conditions with
0:19:59 any heart condition
0:20:00 so it's clear that there's a
0:20:02 contraindication there this should not
0:20:04 be given to anyone without condition
0:20:05 so any experimental design we should not
0:20:07 exclude those without
0:20:08 conditions is a faulty design
0:20:11 it should be excluded we know that
0:20:13 already we should exclude that we should
0:20:15 apply that or try it only on those who
0:20:17 have no heart condition
0:20:19 either with cetitude they have a medical
0:20:20 history etcetera about that
0:20:23 or artists with high probability then
0:20:25 from those only we apply that that
0:20:27 that and that has to be applied
0:20:29 neutrally
0:20:30 then there's a problem also what is the
0:20:32 moral aspect of giving some people
0:20:33 placebo who may be dying
0:20:35 because because they don't receive and
0:20:37 the other lucky ones receiving which may
0:20:38 work
0:20:39 there's also more reconciliation so it
0:20:41 has to be an open level at this point
0:20:43 just mentioning that example to show
0:20:44 that even with this standard
0:20:47 still human beings desires and political
0:20:49 motivation could play our own
0:20:50 and mess things up
0:20:54 so all the experience you hear about
0:20:55 that experiment in brazil who's failed
0:20:57 as well i am almost had to be sure they
0:21:00 are not well designed
0:21:02 so they design itself even if it's
0:21:04 placebo control design
0:21:06 that sign is not is not persuasive it's
0:21:07 not done probably not benefiting from
0:21:09 all what we have already
0:21:10 explained know about drugs or
0:21:12 chlorophyll we should invest that all of
0:21:14 it first
0:21:15 and then say oh this in that this
0:21:17 contraindication this is not
0:21:18 we only the one who are not real and
0:21:20 this is a good portion of the population
0:21:23 on the other hand the majority which are
0:21:24 delivered the hospital which you can do
0:21:25 that to them the moderation
0:21:26 really they will not become so severe
0:21:28 unless they have preconditions usually a
0:21:30 cardiovascular
0:21:31 so they will be a minority which will
0:21:33 but still this minorities we're trying
0:21:35 for that
0:21:36 maybe it works for this minority why
0:21:37 deprive a minority who have
0:21:39 another precondition but not hard
0:21:41 conditions who could
0:21:43 uh could benefit from it to uh provides
0:21:45 giving with uh azithromycin the other
0:21:47 antibiotic
0:21:48 but the design was never done that it
0:21:50 was done just universal as if we're
0:21:52 having a new drug which nobody knows
0:21:53 about anything
0:21:54 for just because of certain political
0:21:56 motivation
0:21:57 or just laziness and the stupidity of
0:22:00 the recession so i'm sorry to say that i
0:22:01 know some medical doctor will be
0:22:02 offended but
0:22:03 that's the problem sometimes you get
0:22:05 lazy and you don't do the design as it
0:22:07 should be no the design should be done
0:22:08 properly first
0:22:12 but uh dictated only by what we know
0:22:15 already when we will establish about
0:22:16 this material over the last 30 years
0:22:18 only by that not but what
0:22:20 trump says or muhammadan says that's the
0:22:22 way to go but it's very difficult it's
0:22:23 theoretically nice on table
0:22:25 but when it comes to doing an experiment
0:22:27 which is a big experience which is
0:22:28 course may cost money and needs certain
0:22:30 legal documents to be signed and so on
0:22:32 you may become lacks
0:22:33 and then the result you may miss a good
0:22:36 treatment or possibility
0:22:38 you only miss a good treatment
0:22:39 possibility
0:22:41 because of this this confrontation
0:22:42 between various people fighting for
0:22:44 power
0:22:45 not caring really very much that much
0:22:47 about patients but they're caring about
0:22:48 their power we have to enforce ourselves
0:22:50 we are we are the right ones
0:22:51 we are the medical authority like the
0:22:53 fda and so on we have to enforce that
0:22:56 and then arrogantly this can no that's
0:22:59 not a praising of trump he's an idiot
0:23:00 and he's stupid
0:23:01 and he is a publicist and a demagogue
0:23:04 but still in that point
0:23:05 he may be more right than the fda
0:23:09 and he he don't say that but himself
0:23:11 taking that as a precaution
0:23:12 as a as a protective measure which could
0:23:15 could have some effect
0:23:19 so let's give an example of
0:23:23 how how to deal with with probably even
0:23:26 the medical field even with all the
0:23:27 scientific
0:23:29 safeguards still human desire and
0:23:32 intentions may play a role and
0:23:33 interfere with it it's very difficult to
0:23:36 to attend an issue
0:23:37 or completely without bio within without
0:23:39 bias it's very very difficult
0:23:43 and then search for something support
0:23:45 you by us and ignore that one doesn't
0:23:46 support you by it
0:23:50 that's that's that's that's a
0:23:51 fundamental difficulty in human beings
0:23:52 who could be
0:23:53 limited and whatever will have
0:23:54 motivation cannot act without motivation
0:23:57 and so on but we have to do our best we
0:23:58 have to try
0:24:00 we have to try okay so let's let's just
0:24:05 just casual all thoughts about about the
0:24:08 pitfalls of
0:24:09 of uh where where even tamiya went wrong
0:24:12 and he could he should have seen his
0:24:14 wrong i think the moment he was
0:24:16 expanding the the evidence about the
0:24:18 ayat tamano which is one of the best
0:24:20 expansion you find ever anywhere
0:24:22 i adopted it completely with one symbol
0:24:24 change everywhere you said rub i took
0:24:26 rub and put
0:24:27 who i put in because the ayah will use
0:24:29 the way he's not using
0:24:45 there's a creation or or anything or
0:24:48 body worth you bring him
0:24:49 to worshiping him and the eliza eternity
0:24:52 from beginning to end for all time he's
0:24:53 by his necessity by reason he's an elah
0:24:55 has nothing to do with existence or
0:24:56 non-existence of worship
0:24:58 in the first place if he would have
0:25:00 recognized that
0:25:03 but he did not and he chose even to
0:25:05 change in
0:25:07 almost the fact for saying the quran you
0:25:09 are not using the correct words i am
0:25:10 using words
0:25:12 this is this is very grave he did not
0:25:14 intend to say that differently
0:25:16 that would be clear government but it's
0:25:18 it's it's stiff almost like that
0:25:20 it's almost as as as catastrophic as
0:25:23 wrong as that
0:25:24 and from there then accumulated and
0:25:26 accommodated and accumulated
0:25:28 and became done in hand of people who
0:25:29 are less philosophically sophisticated
0:25:31 and capable like muhammad aloha
0:25:32 became the catastrophe become a very
0:25:35 sharp sword which cuts everywhere
0:25:36 cut specs cuts whole people will declare
0:25:39 everyone to be careful and so on
0:25:41 went to extremes which history testify
0:25:45 became extreme however fighting against
0:25:47 muslims everywhere and
0:25:49 cooperating and appeasing cafes almost
0:25:52 everywhere
0:25:53 even in the gulf accommodating with the
0:25:55 british against other muslims
0:25:59 so but this is all history with it will
0:26:01 come some of it will come we don't want
0:26:02 to indulge in history
0:26:04 but sometimes you are you are forced to
0:26:05 address these things just
0:26:07 in a casual manner so that's it that's
0:26:09 so the mistake of
0:26:10 is that that worship for him is his
0:26:12 collection of action and things like
0:26:13 that that's not rashford
0:26:15 russia is acknowledging the divinity the
0:26:18 full divinity of allah
0:26:19 or is it exactly saying that he is the
0:26:21 only sovereign because the full divinity
0:26:23 entails the exclusive sovereignty
0:26:25 is the only ramp and that is not
0:26:29 the creator of the trump is the
0:26:30 sovereign and the master the commander
0:26:32 the owner
0:26:33 in the kids of allah is also the creator
0:26:35 but it's still reason but
0:26:37 that is not in the fundamental meaning
0:26:38 of the concept
0:26:41 and sheikh can happen those who
0:26:44 took their monks and and and scholars
0:26:47 the lords beside allah and worshiped
0:26:49 them this way
0:26:50 they never thought that they created the
0:26:52 best they never thought that they are
0:26:53 divine in any sense no
0:26:54 but still they made them divine and gods
0:26:57 beside allah
0:26:58 by attributing sovereignty to them and
0:27:00 the right of legislation to them
0:27:03 and they said this is that shows that's
0:27:05 this this is genuinely and at the moment
0:27:07 when we see through the quran that's
0:27:09 genuinely everywhere in the quran is
0:27:10 declining
0:27:12 it is because of the issue of uh
0:27:14 sovereignty and lordship not the issue
0:27:16 of who created and who
0:27:17 pause and whose surrenders and that's
0:27:20 that's
0:27:21 who was or who makes a joke and that's
0:27:23 not like that no
0:27:25 it is who attributes the divinity and
0:27:26 sovereignty
0:27:30 but that's welcome michelle a bit by the
0:27:32 standard the whole
0:27:33 we have this basic idea we'll expand in
0:27:35 every place and see how it works
0:27:37 inshallah
0:27:38 to make things perfectly consistent and
0:27:41 well balanced
0:27:42 okay i think we'll stop here we shall
0:27:44 next week same time being
0:27:54 foreign