Segregating Black and White Sprinters due to Black Advantage (2019-03-28) ​
Description ​
This video argues that second-wave feminist objections to women and men participating in sports with gender-neutral parameters are contradictory to their main claim that anatomical/biological differences shouldn't be considered in the administration of social, political and economic equality. The selective second-wave invocations of biological and anatomical differences when it allows for advantage or female privileges is an ample example of the untenability of the absolute equality argument which second-wave feminists continually make.
Summary of Segregating Black and White Sprinters due to Black Advantage ​
*This summary is AI generated - there may be inaccuracies.
00:00:00 - 00:10:00 ​
the author argues that, because of black athletes' biological and anatomical advantages in sprinting, they should be segregated from white athletes. However, feminists argue that, in order to achieve equality in all spheres of life, there should be no exceptions to this rule in regards to sports.
00:00:00 Simone de Beauvoir's arguments for equality between men and women are critiqued. Three live examples are given of how feminists' assumptions about physical differences between men and women can lead to problems. For instance, if a man has undergone gender reassignment surgery and identifies as a woman, they may have an unfair advantage in sports competition against women.
- 00:05:00 argues that, because of black athletes' biological and anatomical advantages in sprinting, they should be segregated from white athletes. However, feminists argue that, in order to achieve equality in all spheres of life, there should be no exceptions to this rule in regards to sports. also argues that, because of the social ills of the past, equality of opportunity should be a goal in all areas of life.
- *00:10:00 Discusses the historical discrimination against men in the field of war and how it has led to many deaths. suggests that, in order to rectify the problem, we should use principles of feminism to selectively give women an opportunity to excel, rather than treating them equally.
Full transcript with timestamps: CLICK TO EXPAND
0:00:00 in examining especially second-wave
0:00:03 feminist ik discourse is clear the
0:00:06 premises the premises there are physical
0:00:10 differences Simone de Beauvoir makes
0:00:13 that candidly clear there are physical
0:00:16 differences between men and women we
0:00:17 know them we're not ignorant to them
0:00:21 she even mentions emotional differences
0:00:24 in her book the second sex and her
0:00:27 chapter on biology she says even
0:00:29 biological differences anatomical
0:00:31 differences physiological differences
0:00:33 psychological differences emotional
0:00:35 differences but the argument goes as
0:00:37 follows despite those differences there
0:00:40 should be equality does that make sense
0:00:44 so far so if a second-rate feminist
0:00:46 would say despite those differences
0:00:50 there should be equality afforded
0:00:53 what kind of equality political equality
0:00:55 social equality economic equality this
0:01:01 is pretty much in a nutshell what the
0:01:04 argument is now obviously one could
0:01:06 justifiably ask what's the proof of that
0:01:09 what's the evidence for that why should
0:01:12 that be the case how's that entailment
0:01:15 made from first principles Rousseff
0:01:19 supports how can you justify that
0:01:23 and that's really not a question that
0:01:26 there is any answer to frankly well that
0:01:28 there is any formula given for us on how
0:01:31 to answer those questions however and
0:01:36 this is moving on now to the second part
0:01:38 of the lecture which are to spend a
0:01:39 little bit of time on are we consistent
0:01:45 or are feminists consistent in
0:01:49 particular second where families are
0:01:50 they consistent in the application of
0:01:54 those principles now there are three
0:01:57 things three live examples I want to
0:02:00 give you to show you how problematic
0:02:04 these assumptions are for feminists the
0:02:07 first one relates and I'm sure many of
0:02:09 you might have been exposed to this it's
0:02:13 a big thing on the news now actually
0:02:15 that's why I'm bringing it up it's the
0:02:16 idea of transgendered sports now I'm not
0:02:22 sure if this is kind of them spill over
0:02:24 to Malaysia but this is certainly
0:02:26 something a hot topic in the West in
0:02:29 America and in the UK Western Europe the
0:02:32 question is say for instance you have
0:02:34 someone who identifies and who is
0:02:37 identified biologically as a man they do
0:02:41 a gender reassignment surgery and they
0:02:44 become self-identified as a woman okay
0:02:50 so they do a gender reassignment surgery
0:02:51 and then become self-identified as a
0:02:54 woman can they participate in sports
0:02:58 with women now second wave feminists on
0:03:03 the whole seem averse to the idea now
0:03:06 you can't make a generalization with
0:03:08 anything but big-time second wave
0:03:10 feminists like Germaine Greer who wrote
0:03:12 the book in 1971 the Female Eunuch
0:03:15 she's like one of the founding mothers
0:03:19 of feminism and she in an interview she
0:03:23 completely rejected the idea and guess
0:03:26 what she invoked she invoked anatomical
0:03:30 and biological advantage wait a minute
0:03:34 hold on now hold on now let me hear the
0:03:40 argument yes so the argument goes now
0:03:44 since the person and this is a very
0:03:46 sensible argument to me as a non
0:03:49 feminist right the argument goes since
0:03:53 men have anatomical biological
0:03:57 advantages hormonal advantages and even
0:04:01 having gone through that process and
0:04:04 then the assignment the gender
0:04:06 reassignment happens if they now compete
0:04:09 with women it will give them an unfair
0:04:11 advantage and it will give them an
0:04:14 entitled over privileged position in
0:04:17 that context wait a minute this is
0:04:21 important now I thought you said sex was
0:04:25 or not sex because that's a third wave
0:04:28 construct some say that sex is a social
0:04:31 construct Judith Butler hinted to this
0:04:32 in her book gender troubles 1990 but not
0:04:35 this some do say that I thought you said
0:04:39 gender was a social construct no and you
0:04:46 know it becomes even more problematic do
0:04:49 you know when it becomes more
0:04:50 problematic when we start to see so the
0:04:55 question is now should there be an
0:04:56 equality of opportunity for men and
0:04:59 women in certain sports should we or
0:05:06 should we segregate and separate them
0:05:10 you don't like segregation but you have
0:05:13 it in sports but no no it's justified
0:05:16 for anatomical and biological reasons so
0:05:19 you're saying they're on biological and
0:05:21 anatomical grounds you can justify
0:05:24 separation wait hold on now but men will
0:05:28 be given an advantage why don't you make
0:05:32 that argument in all context of
0:05:34 categories for instance if you look at
0:05:37 the hundred meter dash and I made this
0:05:41 argument before I make here again the
0:05:43 100 meter sprints in the last 100 years
0:05:45 I don't know of one why
0:05:48 man who's won that no I don't know I
0:05:53 don't know one white man that's one that
0:05:55 it's dominated by black people not only
0:05:58 does black people West Africans and
0:06:00 Jamaicans should we separate the blacks
0:06:04 from the whites now if you say we
0:06:08 shouldn't separate the blacks from the
0:06:10 whites you're contradicting yourself you
0:06:12 know why because you said in cases where
0:06:16 there is biological and anatomical
0:06:19 advantages for one category of person
0:06:22 over another category of person there
0:06:24 should be separation so why should that
0:06:26 be the case only for gender why
0:06:29 shouldn't it also be the case for race
0:06:31 because you've recalled racist
0:06:33 this is selective invocation you see
0:06:38 they are not even consistent with their
0:06:40 principles these Africans are very good
0:06:44 at long-distance you know we have
0:06:47 someone called noir Farah very good
0:06:49 runner you know they have an advantage
0:06:53 East Africans birth early they have a
0:06:56 broadening advantage white people have
0:06:58 an advantage in something swimming and I
0:07:01 want to be controversial but I've never
0:07:03 seen a black man win that swimming race
0:07:04 I was at world market Michael Phelps how
0:07:07 many sons do you on it while we're gonna
0:07:11 separate the blacks from the whites
0:07:12 we're not going to separate the blacks
0:07:14 from the whites so what kind of
0:07:16 equalities you wanna so some feminists
0:07:19 would say we want equality of
0:07:20 opportunity and some would actually say
0:07:23 we want equality of outcome all right so
0:07:30 yeah some would say we want any quality
0:07:34 of opportunity but almost all feminists
0:07:37 would say that in fact so why don't you
0:07:40 have an equality of opportunity in
0:07:42 sports
0:07:45 why don't we arrange parameters that
0:07:49 mean that people of the same weights
0:07:51 whether they're men and women they go
0:07:54 together in competition we can do that
0:08:00 it's not difficult it's not difficult in
0:08:04 boxing for example you don't think
0:08:07 there's 75 kilogram women that's the
0:08:09 most popular category for men let's
0:08:11 bring them together right you want
0:08:13 equality of opportunity
0:08:14 no but that's advantage men but he said
0:08:18 the anatomical thing you see it is
0:08:20 really problematic
0:08:21 you have segregation acquiesce
0:08:25 segregation in some spheres where are
0:08:31 the feminists we needs we need a sign
0:08:35 against this seriously if your preview
0:08:40 are principally averse to a biological
0:08:43 anatomical arguments arranged parameters
0:08:47 which does not discriminate on gender in
0:08:51 the field of sports but they will never
0:08:54 do that because it's not about equality
0:08:58 it's about entitlement it's about where
0:09:03 can we find the advantages that's the
0:09:06 problem and this case becomes more
0:09:10 exacerbated when we look at war we need
0:09:15 to rectify the social ills problems of
0:09:21 the past patriarchal society and we need
0:09:27 to have equality of opportunity in all
0:09:31 spheres in all industries political
0:09:33 social and economic there should be
0:09:36 absolutely no exception to that but war
0:09:41 that entails death that entails injury
0:09:46 we don't really know about that one I've
0:09:50 never actually come across their
0:09:54 movements that aims to rectify a
0:09:58 historic accumulation of gender
0:10:07 discrimination against men in the field
0:10:10 of war almost every military in every
0:10:14 country in the world in all of history
0:10:17 has been male-dominated men have died
0:10:21 now if we're being honest we should say
0:10:25 that's a severe matriarchy you're forced
0:10:30 meant to be society inclined or forced
0:10:33 to kill themselves and fight themselves
0:10:37 so for the protection of the country so
0:10:40 on feminism if there's an equality of
0:10:42 opportunity we should address that
0:10:44 historic discrimination and we should
0:10:48 look at all the wars that men were
0:10:51 dominating the armies in them and we
0:10:54 should have female only conscription and
0:10:58 draft forcing the women to fight for the
0:11:01 men for at least the amount of time that
0:11:04 would equalize the historic imbalance no
0:11:10 but brother which are being flooded by
0:11:20 males men is that extra words the actual
0:11:25 maitreya watch before mecca for the meat
0:11:29 to go to Milan talks
0:11:35 what kind of things is what the most
0:11:38 part so if we're going
0:11:40 nobody quality first should we rectify
0:11:44 that the program is guys no it's just to
0:11:49 selective you choose want to be
0:11:52 absolutely equal and you choose you're
0:11:55 in session this is the problem so these
0:11:59 are some clear examples of
0:12:02 inconsistencies even using the first
0:12:05 principles of feminism even using
0:12:08 exactly what they're talking about