Not Ruling by What Allah has Revealed - Part1.avi (2012-02-12)

Description

Part 1

Professor Muhammad Al Massari discusses the grave implications of not ruling by what Allah has revealed and not making Allah and His Messenger (SAW) the source for guidance in all affairs. The Professor provides irrefutable evidences from Quran and Sunnah leaving the objective observer who seeks true guidance under no illusions as to the correct point of view regarding this vital issue.

Summary of Not Ruling by What Allah has Revealed - Part1.avi

This summary is AI generated - there may be inaccuracies. *

00:00:00 - 01:00:00

discusses the different meanings of the word "rule" as it applies to Islam, and how humans are not to rule over one another. It argues that those who do so are guilty of rebellion, and that Muslims should instead follow what Allah has revealed.

**00:00:00

Discusses the different meanings of the word "rule" as it applies to Islam. The first meaning is that of making laws, which is explained in detail. The second meaning is ruling in the sense of making decisions about what is happening in the world. Finally, there is a possible dispute about the definition of the word "modern" in relation to language.
**00:05:00
Discusses the difference between a mufti and a judge, and how a judge's ruling is not binding.
**00:10:00
Discusses the qualifications necessary for a judge, and how a judge should behave when faced with a case. They state that a judge who knowingly makes laws that Allah has not revealed is not a Muslim, and should resign.
**00:15:00
Discusses a case where a Muslim judge decided to rule according to his own desires rather than what Allah has revealed, and how this can lead to him becoming a kafir. He also points out that there are other points of view on the issue.
**00:20:00
Discusses the Islamic concept of "jurisprudence", or ruling according to what Allah has revealed. It explains that this concept is based on the sahaba, or "companions of the prophet". One of these companions, Abraham, is not mentioned in the Quran as the originator of this concept. Instead, the phrase is based on the son of thousands of the liberal palace, who is not mentioned in the Quran either. This indicates that this concept is not Islamic, but rather something that originated among the sahaba.
**00:25:00
Discusses the issue of whether rulings in Islam should be based on what Allah has revealed in the Quran or on what humans have come up with. The narrator points out that there are two stories about this issue, and which one is more accurate. In the first story, which is more accurate, humans are not able to rule correctly, and they end up getting themselves into trouble. On the other hand, in the second story, which is more popular among Muslims, humans are able to rule correctly based on what Allah has revealed in the Quran.
**00:30:00
Discusses the various points of view on a verse in the Quran, which has caused some brothers to argue. says that, if it is applicable to previous nations, it should be applicable to the Islamic Ummah as well. They pose a question to the audience, asking if they think it is disrespectful for scholars to bring up old rulings.
**00:35:00
Discusses the difference between those who rule based on what Allah has revealed, and those who rule based on their own interpretation. It references a hadith in which Abdullah bin Mas'ud says that only those who have iman and kufa have authority to rule. The narrator then goes on to say that this is the opinion of only a few scholars, and that the majority of people are not of that opinion.
**00:40:00 ** a Muslim discusses the difference between what Allah has revealed and what humans create. He points out that humans are not to rule over one another, and that those who do so are guilty of rebellion. He also notes that those who reject faith are likely to be disobedient.
**00:45:00 ** explains that some muslims believe that rulings are not based on what Allah has revealed, but rather on what the muslims "feel" is right. The narrator goes on to say that this is not the correct way to rule, and that Muslims should instead follow what Allah has revealed.
**00:50:00
Discusses the difficulties of applying Islamic law in a modern world. It argues that there is no clear definition of what sharia is, and that it is difficult to apply in a modern world.
**00:55:00 ** Sheikh Ayyub provides a philosophical justification for why a Muslim cannot carry the of "believer" while disagreeing with some of the tenets of Islam, such as the concept of taqlid. He also points out that a Muslim who knows the ruling of Allah on a particular issue is still considered a believer, regardless of whether or not he follows the ruling. Finally, Sheikh Ayyub addresses the issue of kavan, or intoxicant, and how a Muslim is not responsible for consuming it if he does not know it is forbidden.

01:00:00 - 01:30:00

discusses the importance of ruling by what Allah has revealed, rather than by human opinion. argues that humans are not capable of making accurate or fair decisions, and that only a ruler appointed by Allah Himself can lead a country effectively.

**01:00:00

Discusses some aspects of Islamic law and how rulers are able to rule based on what Allah has revealed. Some hadiths are extremely hopeful and provide hope for those who are struggling, while others are threatening and leave people with little choice but to obey. It is important for Muslims to be in the middle and to trust that Allah will guide and protect them.
**01:05:00
Discusses a point of view known as "raving", which holds that there may be a weak point of view in Islamic theology. argues that this viewpoint should not be allowed to dominate Islamic law, because it would create problems for those who follow it. He then goes on to discuss how a ruler should be chosen, based on the principle that allah should be the dominant force in a person's life.
**01:10:00 ** <>
**01:15:00 ** explains that Allah has revealed clear signs to the Prophet Muhammad, and nobody will reject them except those who don't judge with what Allah has revealed. He goes on to say that if someone says that alcohol is haram, then he is wrong, but he is still a Muslim because he is judging with what Allah has revealed. He concludes by saying that if someone wants to know whether alcohol is haram or halal, they should ask someone who knows Arabic and Islamic jurisprudence.
**01:20:00
Discusses the difference between judging with what Allah has revealed and judging with what humans have created. They go on to say that if someone believes in the prophet and opposes what Allah has revealed, then they are contradicting Allah.
**01:25:00
Discusses the difference between ruling by what Allah has revealed and ruling by human beings. argues that humans are not able to accurately judge what is best for others, and that humans are not able to be fair in their rulings. also argues that humans are incapable of leading a country or keeping it safe, and that only a ruler who is appointed by Allah Himself can do these things.
**01:30:00
Discusses the concept of ruling by what Allah has revealed, rather than ruling by one's own opinion.

the speaker discusses the concept of ruling by what Allah has revealed, rather than ruling by one's own opinion. He argues that this is the correct way to approach governing and decision-making, as it is based on divine guidance.

Full transcript with timestamps: CLICK TO EXPAND

0:00:42 oh 0:01:12 hey 0:02:06 and we started 0:02:09 and all the issues will be discussed 0:02:11 more details later but some few issues 0:02:13 came up 0:02:15 mostly 0:02:17 most issues are well certain 0:02:19 there's no major problem 0:02:22 there's only one problem in the 0:02:23 understanding of the three eyes of 0:02:25 sultanate the eyes called the eyes 0:02:47 and 0:02:49 there may be some issues about uh the 0:02:51 word how come but we scanned what the 0:02:52 quran was they were looking for and we 0:02:55 found seven meanings 0:02:59 um 0:03:37 rational problems because 0:03:39 it's impossible to treat the different 0:03:41 categories of things especially the good 0:03:43 do or they even do it the same way that 0:03:45 would be rationally impossible with a 0:03:46 lot of judgment 0:03:49 and 0:03:51 so that's therefore it's not our issue 0:03:53 then we have the judgement of allah 0:03:56 that's not an issue because no dispute 0:04:02 will not dispute that allah will be the 0:04:03 judge there that's not the issue so the 0:04:05 meaning of the four meanings 0:04:07 that's the judiciary 0:04:24 and then we have 0:04:26 uh ruling in the sense of making laws 0:04:30 defining what's happening hell etc 0:04:32 that's that's definitely a ruling that's 0:04:34 with the main eyes 0:04:38 etc 0:04:39 and then we have one maybe a matter of 0:04:41 dispute 0:04:42 is that the action of the 0:04:45 film the executive branch in the buddha 0:04:47 language 0:04:48 cannot be called rolling 0:04:51 modern times in arab language there is a 0:04:53 comma for the government for the council 0:04:55 of ministers so it's usually negative 0:04:57 within those systems 0:05:00 all in the case of the united states of 0:05:02 america it's the president only is that 0:05:04 the so-called cabinet there is no real 0:05:06 capital they are just assisting the 0:05:08 president 0:05:09 of the united states but mostly it is 0:05:11 like prime minister system with the head 0:05:13 of state or king and the prime minister 0:05:15 with the cabinet 0:05:17 but there's some of their use of the 0:05:19 language 0:05:20 and someone could argue because you are 0:05:22 unused for the 0:05:33 i found the woman which owns them 0:05:54 but 0:05:55 for these and for the judges and also 0:05:57 the fatwa which is not buying it but 0:05:59 similar because the difference between a 0:06:01 mufti and the judge is that the mufti 0:06:03 his fatwa is not binding there is no 0:06:05 there is no no obligation of the state 0:06:07 authorities or the power or the or the 0:06:10 other who receive that fire to comply 0:06:12 with it they are not obliged while the 0:06:13 judge who is who is appointed properly 0:06:16 from a legitimate ruler from the hadith 0:06:17 for example his ruling has to be 0:06:19 executed 0:06:21 you can't say i'm not convinced about 0:06:22 this point of view that's not the mother 0:06:24 of being convinced enough as long as 0:06:25 he's the official judge appointed 0:06:27 properly his ruling is never going to be 0:06:29 executed and the obama will set a 0:06:31 discourse if he was right or wrong 0:06:33 that's another issue but that's the way 0:06:35 the judiciary were otherwise 0:06:37 disputes of the people will never be 0:06:38 settled if it's depending about both 0:06:40 sides being convinced over the argument 0:06:42 that would not be 0:06:44 uh behind the judiciary just a fatwa 0:06:46 well father 0:06:47 what's your point of view well how do 0:06:49 you 0:06:49 how do you 0:06:51 get what's your point be about this 0:06:52 issue he'll give a hug all of that one 0:06:54 let's have this and this but you can 0:06:55 take it or leave it depending upon the 0:06:57 strength of the helmet nobody is bound 0:06:58 by that 0:07:01 so for the judge there's no doubt that 0:07:02 he's 0:07:03 what he does 0:07:04 although the word 0:07:05 is used also but also hack 0:07:09 someone could say because it's for the 0:07:10 judge who arbitrate disputes when the 0:07:12 people come to him just because usually 0:07:14 judiciary the judge never acts on his 0:07:16 own to start with he waits for people to 0:07:19 come they have a dispute and then he 0:07:21 obviously judgment 0:07:23 then offers theory by greater reason for 0:07:25 the one who has to manage the public 0:07:26 affairs like governor like head of state 0:07:29 who are more executive branches 0:07:32 who may act even initially without even 0:07:34 anyone approaching them just to raise 0:07:36 the public affair because that's their 0:07:37 duty to monitor they have to be 0:07:39 proactive 0:07:40 so by greater reason but in any case for 0:07:43 the issue of mala 0:07:45 foreign is it it would be reasonable 0:07:48 just to concentrate on the judge because 0:07:51 first of all the judge is hacking 0:07:53 evidence for that is plenty of quran 0:08:11 clearly 0:08:12 but applies for them and also the more 0:08:15 the clearest evidence that the judge is 0:08:16 also called hakim is the ayah about 0:08:20 the combination 0:08:21 don't consume each other 0:08:24 and then approach to the outcome to the 0:08:26 rulers or the judges or they are in the 0:08:28 authority who can judge 0:08:29 so that 0:08:30 hoping that the judge will give you 0:08:32 a riot and you know you don't have the 0:08:34 right and that and you swallow it you 0:08:36 think that you can't get away with that 0:08:38 you will not get away with that even if 0:08:40 a judge will give you that you can't you 0:08:42 can mislead the judge or you can't pry 0:08:45 for whatever reason you get a 0:08:47 judgment in your favor getting a 0:08:49 judgment in your favor would not make 0:08:51 the wrong right for the right wrong fool 0:08:53 was going to change the reality 0:08:55 as known to allah and not get him from 0:08:57 the punishment 0:08:59 so here definitely the talk is about 0:09:02 someone who is arbitrating a dispute 0:09:04 because people who would not do it for 0:09:06 help 0:09:11 applying to the hacking call approaching 0:09:13 the hacker for the decision 0:09:15 someone could say that applies also for 0:09:17 the executive because you may go to the 0:09:19 executive applying for example a piece 0:09:20 of land which doesn't belong to you you 0:09:22 know to someone else who doesn't have 0:09:24 documents and they apply it is dead i'm 0:09:26 going to revive it and then 0:09:28 start 0:09:29 putting plants there and building and 0:09:31 then claim it after some time that's 0:09:33 usually that's not a judicial process 0:09:34 it's more than that process someone 0:09:36 could say but definitely in the case of 0:09:38 judicial process it's very clear that 0:09:40 some people are having a dispute they 0:09:41 can't go to a judge will be hitler for 0:09:43 help 0:09:44 and then the one who does it knowingly 0:09:46 that it's not his right is 0:09:48 actually consuming people 0:09:51 money without justification and he's 0:09:53 liable 0:09:54 so just going to the judge ruler so the 0:09:56 quran used the temple 0:09:58 who comes up 0:09:59 which means he a judge or maybe even 0:10:02 a mutant 0:10:16 they agreed 0:10:20 it is the first instance it is 0:10:23 prohibiting anyone from approaching 0:10:25 the judiciary in his favor which he 0:10:27 knows that it's not he doesn't have the 0:10:29 right that would not give 0:10:36 but he will not be getting away so this 0:10:38 definitely the judge who is exercising 0:10:40 the judiciary 0:10:44 the judge who is doing 0:10:54 while exercising judicial powers is 0:11:10 so what is the issue then 0:11:12 concerning in acting laws making laws 0:11:15 that's a hacking also this they should 0:11:17 be not very much of of uh an issue i 0:11:19 think there's no disagreement that the 0:11:20 one who is enacting those who allah did 0:11:22 not reveal or doubt knowingly that they 0:11:25 are not also allah 0:11:31 making himself a partner to allah in 0:11:33 enrolling 0:11:35 clearly 0:11:36 going against 0:11:38 the clear injection what i think about 0:11:39 me so he's 0:11:51 i don't think there will be much dispute 0:11:53 and there was never a dispute entire 0:11:54 pastor someone who makes laws 0:11:57 which i don't know what allah has 0:11:58 revealed 0:12:00 that he is mushrik and katharine he's 0:12:02 declaring him to be actually 0:12:04 god beside allah there was never 0:12:07 never happened in islamic history as far 0:12:09 as you know can tell until the morgues 0:12:11 came and they originally are pagans 0:12:13 anjika's fan has his own law called the 0:12:15 asset for the yasi 0:12:16 and 0:12:17 as a pagan nation they have their own 0:12:19 laws derived from traditions and so on 0:12:22 winds of the kings and so on but his 0:12:24 children and grandchildren actually 0:12:26 grandchildren starting with the 0:12:27 grandchildren some of them raised islam 0:12:29 and they still kept this the asset 0:12:32 inherited that message and the scholar 0:12:33 had commented on that 0:12:35 i don't think there was any disagreement 0:12:36 on an issue about that but one way to 0:12:38 hack him and this is that one who makes 0:12:40 law 0:12:41 that the one who makes slow which allah 0:12:42 did not reveal with no praise whatsoever 0:12:45 the revelation just purely as inherited 0:12:47 from the grand palace or just by pure 0:12:49 whims 0:12:51 that this one is definitely out of the 0:12:53 form of islam and did this no no i don't 0:12:55 think there's a dispute so that this 0:12:56 view to a discussion would be the one 0:12:59 who is managing the affairs or the one 0:13:00 who is judging between disputants the 0:13:03 judge 0:13:04 who does not rule the right household 0:13:06 and he's a muslim 0:13:08 to start with if he's not a muslim 0:13:09 statue we don't need to bother but he's 0:13:10 a catholic if he's a pagan or an 0:13:12 american 0:13:14 secular who don't need to discuss so as 0:13:16 we may have muslim judges there 0:13:18 and he 0:13:19 does not rule that was knowingly 0:13:24 and 0:13:24 uh 0:13:27 he doesn't know that what i was before 0:13:29 he was concerned with conviction or even 0:13:31 we said we we said last time even if he 0:13:34 avoid any ruining like by for example a 0:13:37 judge will 0:13:38 uh 0:13:39 know about certain facts in a case 0:13:41 which is in front of him 0:13:43 and he's obliged to look in the cave 0:13:45 there's no other the case came to him 0:13:46 and he's the appointed judge of the case 0:13:48 because sometimes you may be at liberty 0:13:50 not to rule 0:13:52 in certain cases you may be not ugly not 0:13:54 at all or if you doubt that you are 0:13:56 independent like a judge who thinks that 0:13:58 he is biased 0:13:59 then he has here 0:14:01 most likely has the obligation to say i 0:14:03 don't think i would be sufficiently 0:14:05 neutral i have a relation to one of the 0:14:07 parties i don't think i'll be ever able 0:14:10 to overcome my my inclination zone i 0:14:12 declare myself to be resigned from this 0:14:15 case let the kids go to another that's 0:14:17 that's 0:14:17 most likely no problem with that not 0:14:19 only the problem is actually that's this 0:14:22 that's the way it should be the moment 0:14:23 you feel that you cannot be completely 0:14:25 neutral and independent judging 0:14:26 according to the evidence but according 0:14:29 to desires you should not be 0:14:31 sitting in the judiciary in the first 0:14:32 place or in that specific case you have 0:14:34 to resign the case but someone who 0:14:38 does not have the situation right he 0:14:39 knows very well that he is the only one 0:14:41 qualified and that the case is on his 0:14:43 table already 0:14:45 and then 0:14:47 and he knows if the case is taken from 0:14:49 him or he claims to be unfit for any 0:14:51 reason falsely and the kids go to 0:14:53 another judge the other child does not 0:14:55 know enough information doesn't have a 0:14:56 background which will guide him to all 0:14:58 according to the throat so he does it 0:15:00 deliberately to get the case 0:15:03 judged in favor of someone else so he 0:15:04 does not want anything he resigns 0:15:06 thinking he is out of the responsibility 0:15:08 and let the case go to someone else and 0:15:09 he knows this case will be 0:15:12 not judged properly by the other judge 0:15:14 because i just don't have the background 0:15:16 he has the information he has 0:15:19 and 0:15:19 and if he has to look at the case then 0:15:22 he is either holds according to his 0:15:24 information that's really against his 0:15:25 interest 0:15:26 maybe 0:15:28 it is against his relatives or against 0:15:30 his own selfish interest or something 0:15:32 like that then he tried to get away by 0:15:34 this hiding 0:15:35 but let us take the positive case that 0:15:37 he rules knowingly he does not recycle 0:15:40 the case 0:15:41 and he decided to to go ahead and rule 0:15:45 according to that not what allah has 0:15:46 revealed 0:15:48 there's a muslim church to start with 0:15:51 the ayah is then 0:16:07 ruling principle by islam but follow his 0:16:09 desire 0:16:11 and in a specific case knowingly does 0:16:13 not rule 0:16:15 the world which he is convinced this is 0:16:17 allah ruling that he is but he does not 0:16:19 according to that 0:16:20 putting his selfish desires or he greed 0:16:25 his his 0:16:26 his desire for power for wealth or 0:16:28 whatever or his protection for his own 0:16:30 kin etcetera putting it above 0:16:33 the obligation to rule that 0:16:35 what is his status 0:16:38 what is his status 0:16:40 is he with this action the real action 0:16:42 by ruling that that one allah has not 0:16:44 revealed or avoiding wrong is he with 0:16:46 the mere action becoming a kafir or the 0:16:49 islam or he is like 0:16:51 the sinner of any type 0:16:53 and this is an old issue it's not a new 0:16:56 one it is 0:16:58 it is since the time of 0:17:01 the sahaba century 0:17:16 he knows that he is sinful in the sense 0:17:18 that he's behaving 0:17:20 but he follows his desires or follows 0:17:22 his 0:17:23 yeah any kind of desire to desire for 0:17:25 power holding power most most 0:17:30 mostly it is it is the one who empowered 0:17:32 an above position with this goal to lose 0:17:33 power so for the case of keeping the 0:17:35 power he rules not without allah has 0:17:38 revealed to keep the power or to keep 0:17:40 the wealth to keep the 0:17:41 standing in society 0:17:43 um we have from the table in time for 0:17:45 example living in his explanation of the 0:17:48 ayah 0:17:48 he has a dispute or has an argument with 0:17:50 the 0:17:51 with the 0:17:53 some of the hawaiians from the abali 0:17:54 school which is relatively mild school 0:17:57 some of them are still in oman and 0:18:08 what do you think about these three ayah 0:18:10 and he answered said 0:18:11 it is that what has do it is their deen 0:18:14 which they believe is the demon of allah 0:18:16 and if they not rule with that he is not 0:18:18 denying that some of the maya were doing 0:18:20 in specific cases not worrying about 0:18:22 what allah has given it 0:18:23 it's not the right this is very obvious 0:18:25 and clear like a hajj like a black male 0:18:27 one but their action is very clear or 0:18:29 they find publicly all kind of arguments 0:18:32 that all kind of that we they play that 0:18:34 they will talk with the standard how it 0:18:36 is that someone rebelling against the 0:18:37 government he's a haraji 0:18:39 his shelling blood should should be 0:18:41 killed and they know very well he is not 0:18:43 a heart here he is not coming to shed 0:18:45 blood he is disputing within their 0:18:46 illegitimate power they know that very 0:18:48 well 0:18:48 but they can't publicly argue this way 0:18:51 they can't bring forth publicly that 0:18:53 that 0:18:54 but in reality they know 0:18:56 so the bizarre is uh discussing this 0:18:58 case saying 0:18:59 these they know they are this is the 0:19:01 that's the d and they confess 0:19:04 because they are muslims and they know 0:19:06 when they do that that they have 0:19:07 committed the same but they have this 0:19:17 but you are afraid 0:19:19 you are afraid to say the truth 0:19:22 and fear of the government they said i 0:19:24 am not afraid when you are afraid that 0:19:25 if you are really not afraid you should 0:19:27 be using the sword and rebuilding them 0:19:29 because those are while they were not 0:19:30 using the sword at the time they were 0:19:32 motorcycles 0:19:33 somehow they did use this also is not 0:19:36 hundred percent correct but maybe this 0:19:37 specific group was just theoretical 0:19:40 not 0:19:41 not really any rebellious so this is 0:19:44 clear articulating this point of view 0:19:45 clearly 0:19:49 but we have the other points of view i 0:19:50 think in this paper we have mentioned a 0:19:53 narration from a study that if someone 0:19:55 also 0:19:56 takes a bribe 0:19:58 he becomes with that 0:20:00 that's the sudden cabinet 0:20:04 we have also the usual confusion going 0:20:06 back to the relationship with abbas 0:20:08 that's the famous 0:20:10 the best generation during the past the 0:20:13 one couple 0:20:14 and then in one nation says 0:20:18 it's not like the one who committed kofo 0:20:20 like 0:20:22 because the standard for the the one who 0:20:24 rejects allah is messengers with the 0:20:26 angels and they object 0:20:28 this is the the phrase the classical 0:20:30 the sahaba that have been used for the 0:20:32 foreign 0:20:35 this world came later 0:20:37 but uh the stronger narration 0:20:40 which shows that this statement is not 0:20:42 like a coffer who committed cover 0:20:44 against allah and his messenger 0:20:46 and angels and books and the day of 0:20:47 judgment that this phrase is actually 0:20:50 not from abraham us and not even from 0:20:52 his student taurus it is from the son of 0:20:54 thousands of the liberal palace 0:20:56 this is the strong narration so 0:21:00 only the first phase here be here 0:21:03 it is it is or in another narration 0:21:07 enough for him to go for without 0:21:09 specifying which kind of cover is that 0:21:11 which is usually taken at face value it 0:21:13 is the usual cover which used in the 0:21:15 quran 0:21:17 so that's that's even abbas according to 0:21:20 the better and stronger narration is 0:21:22 is 0:21:24 not very clear but most likely from the 0:21:26 general school of the of the sahaba for 0:21:29 example generation of the excellent 0:21:31 snack from this road is that 0:21:34 someone asking what is sweat so it is 0:21:36 bribe 0:21:37 and he explained gave an example said we 0:21:39 thought so it is 0:21:41 taking joshua taking bribe and rolling 0:21:43 say let's go 0:21:45 that's not the city 0:21:46 like the caviar of sweat that's will be 0:21:49 done 0:21:50 would be there will be taking out of the 0:21:52 description of being just mere sort 0:21:54 which is a cabera because it must have 0:21:56 knows that 0:22:11 want we have to slim it down to the case 0:22:12 of judge because it's very clear 0:22:14 and 0:22:15 see what what the various scholars in 0:22:17 time past said 0:22:19 so the eyes are the eye 0:22:22 are clear 0:22:23 there have been various atoms about the 0:22:25 three eyes the eyes i will know should 0:22:26 they read them yeah i think we should 0:22:27 read them in how we can in english so 0:22:29 the wording of the eyes is very clear 0:22:31 and this is the paper which we write and 0:22:33 also in english so because majority of 0:22:36 english speaker so the eyes with the 0:22:38 eyes 0:23:06 in advance just to have the whole 0:23:08 context because the is before has 0:23:10 nothing to do with this topic 0:23:19 um 0:23:26 foreign 0:23:48 foreign 0:24:02 foreign 0:24:17 foreign 0:24:59 so 0:25:00 some are in advance and after so that's 0:25:03 the whole context about the stalling 0:25:04 issue 0:25:05 and the story of that is this 0:25:07 revelation we will discuss which gives 0:25:09 some light but it's not necessarily the 0:25:11 heading by itself should the wedding of 0:25:13 the quran should be normally sufficient 0:25:15 the stories are what revelation were 0:25:17 established by good is not 0:25:19 just enlighten how to apply it 0:25:22 and the certain aspects become more 0:25:25 clear that's it but it does not 0:25:27 change anything in the in the verbal 0:25:29 because it has come with an arabian 0:25:31 movie 0:25:32 and 0:25:33 that's sufficient in itself with the 0:25:35 exponential the sunlight if needed but 0:25:37 in that case it should be sufficient by 0:25:39 itself 0:25:40 so a lot of 0:25:54 whether it be among those who say we 0:25:57 believe with their lips but whose hearts 0:25:58 have no fear or be among the jews 0:26:01 men who will listen to any lie 0:26:03 will listen we will listen even to 0:26:06 others who have never 0:26:07 much has come to thee they ashamed or to 0:26:10 you i will change the truth 0:26:12 they change the words from their right 0:26:14 times and places they say if you are 0:26:16 given this take it but if not beware 0:26:18 we'll mention the story for the reason 0:26:19 for the revelation two stories and which 0:26:21 one is more accurate inshallah if 0:26:24 anyone's trial is intended by allah you 0:26:27 will have no authority in the least for 0:26:29 him against allah if allah to misguide 0:26:31 someone or test him you cannot help them 0:26:33 at all 0:26:35 for such it is not allah allah's will to 0:26:37 purify their hearts for them there is 0:26:39 this case in this world and after a 0:26:41 heavy punishment so these people for 0:26:44 what's conspiring about story which will 0:26:46 soon mention what is the story 0:26:49 they are fond of listening to falsehood 0:26:52 of devouring 0:26:54 bribery this is that mainly they choose 0:26:56 them but also the hypocrites of medina 0:26:58 and the arab they are also up to their 0:26:59 ears 0:27:00 and bribery also 0:27:02 if they will come to a to you either jet 0:27:04 between them or decline to interfere 0:27:06 they say either you judge this but if 0:27:08 you judge 0:27:10 if you decline they cannot hurt you in 0:27:13 the least 0:27:14 but if you judge 0:27:15 then 0:27:16 you are obliged to certain principle 0:27:18 judge equity between them not just 0:27:21 injustice 0:27:23 for allah i love those who judge 0:27:25 inequity focused on justice 0:27:27 because 0:27:28 this is actually an arabic word coming 0:27:30 from from just just 0:27:35 so it's originally 0:27:37 a latin word which has been analyzed 0:27:42 but why do they come to you for decision 0:27:45 when they have their own law before them 0:27:48 is something suspicious they don't 0:27:50 believe in you they have not witnessed 0:27:51 that you are messaged why they are 0:27:53 coming to you while claiming they have 0:27:54 their own language they believe there 0:27:56 must be something fishy with these 0:27:57 fellows 0:27:58 therein is the plain command of allah 0:28:00 according to the belief but also allah 0:28:02 that has the law of allah itself that 0:28:05 despite them 0:28:06 the mutilation has changed it still has 0:28:08 the law of alliance in this essential 0:28:10 structure there 0:28:16 and even after that knowing that they 0:28:18 have the law of allah they turn away 0:28:19 from it they will turn away for they are 0:28:21 not really people of faith they don't 0:28:23 really believe they claim to believe 0:28:24 that they are not killing them even in 0:28:26 their own law 0:28:28 then then it continues 0:28:32 it was allah's talking about himself it 0:28:34 was we who revealed the law or the torah 0:28:36 to musa therein was guidance and light 0:28:39 by its standard have been judged the 0:28:41 jews by the prophets who bowed or are 0:28:43 submitted to islam 0:28:44 in the word islam in the linguistic 0:28:45 meaning the prophets who are submitted 0:28:49 by the robbies and the doctors although 0:28:51 this is some translation you could say 0:28:53 that 0:28:54 the scholars and the monks 0:28:56 yeah 0:29:00 for the help for them was interested in 0:29:01 the protection of our last book because 0:29:03 allah interested to live the protection 0:29:04 of the book not like this book has been 0:29:06 protected by allah directly but those 0:29:08 have been trusted to keep the bugatti 0:29:10 transmitted and 0:29:13 they they they were witnesses there also 0:29:15 they also witnessed that that's the book 0:29:16 of allah and they were responsible for 0:29:17 this witness 0:29:18 therefore fear not men but fear me 0:29:20 elijah they think that this prophets are 0:29:22 the scholars of the jewish one don't 0:29:24 fear the people fear me only so that you 0:29:26 can fulfill your duty over taking the 0:29:28 book and witnessing of its content 0:29:32 and don't send my is my signs or my my 0:29:35 revelation for miserable because many 0:29:37 people have regulation to send whatever 0:29:39 has it been for a miserable recently 0:29:42 during a reward for power for wealth for 0:29:44 money for woman whatever so allah is 0:29:45 warning from that 0:29:47 and then the 0:29:48 crucial sentence comes and whoever rules 0:29:51 and whoever men in arabic whoever rules 0:29:54 but other than what allah divided they 0:29:56 are al-kafir 0:29:57 and they did not even translate the word 0:30:00 because it has a crucial 0:30:02 meaning 0:30:03 and there will be a dispute about the 0:30:05 significance of what kaffir would 0:30:12 um 0:30:13 you've read half of the uh the verse 0:30:16 there 0:30:17 um 0:30:18 well 0:30:19 in light of this 0:30:20 verse some brothers have come today 0:30:24 because 0:30:25 they disagree partially yeah we read 0:30:28 that and say their various points and 0:30:30 then we shall have because they try to 0:30:32 clarify that yeah unfortunately we're 0:30:33 pressed for time as well okay so if i 0:30:36 could just 0:30:38 push it 0:30:39 yeah along 0:30:40 with a question yeah please if you don't 0:30:43 but the eye has to be read so this is 0:30:44 the at the end the end phrase which is 0:30:46 the 11th one and whoever rules by other 0:30:48 than 0:31:11 in general and entrusted to the 0:31:14 which has been 0:31:15 that the base base of judgment by the 0:31:17 the prophets who said in the torah but 0:31:19 also who are usually infallible but also 0:31:21 by the 0:31:23 scholars and the amongst of the 0:31:25 rabbis and doctors if you wish to 0:31:27 translate 0:31:30 who have been trusted to keep the book 0:31:31 of allah and all by it and they have 0:31:33 been ordered not to fear the man that 0:31:35 the people fear allah only and not to 0:31:37 sell allah's 0:31:40 revelation for miserable 0:31:42 miserable 0:31:44 so 0:31:45 the only thing we shall come one could 0:31:47 say here is this is applies only for the 0:31:49 jews 0:31:50 not for anybody else is that listening 0:31:52 to the jews but this is the phrase 0:31:55 that general secondly if that's for the 0:31:57 jews then by a greater reason for the 0:31:59 more 0:32:01 the the better book and the final book 0:32:03 should be even for greater reasons that 0:32:06 if they are not permitted to send them 0:32:08 in a minor book or a lower book than for 0:32:11 the higher book and the final book they 0:32:12 should obligation should be even 0:32:13 stronger so there's no escape from that 0:32:15 this is if it's if it is 0:32:18 whatever there's not always that allah 0:32:19 from the jews it's cafe rule then from 0:32:21 other nations unfortunately and even 0:32:23 more and the next ayah mentions some 0:32:26 laws of the of the of the torah which is 0:32:28 the essential laws of crisis 0:32:30 sold for soul eye for i knows for those 0:32:32 etcetera and the injuries the sauce it 0:32:36 has system of balanced out retribution 0:32:39 and redress 0:32:40 and then i 0:32:41 continue saying uh one of general's 0:32:44 statement again and whoever rules by 0:32:46 other than that 0:32:47 has revealed they are 0:32:49 fascicled and are valuable so after 0:32:52 mentioning some ruling of the torah 0:32:54 the conclusion with our volleyball the 0:32:57 same 0:32:58 the phrasing but instead of a catherine 0:33:00 we have a volleyball 0:33:01 then 0:33:02 it is addressed then isabel mariam was 0:33:04 sent after that confirming the torah 0:33:07 before him or the law and then 0:33:09 he has gotten a new revelation called 0:33:11 the rng or the good news 0:33:14 and the people of india were ordered 0:33:17 to apply that the people of india were 0:33:19 ordered to apply whatever the injil has 0:33:21 abrogated or added to the torah 0:33:26 having some obligation and some new laws 0:33:28 that's all but there may no still at all 0:33:30 and this is very clear in the statement 0:33:32 they have in their hand now although 0:33:34 they claim that's all abrogated by his 0:33:35 crucifixion and ascension to heaven but 0:33:38 the wedding is very clear in the 0:33:39 existing that he did not come to change 0:33:41 anyone well from the law and that he 0:33:43 shared only a few rulings and east of 0:33:45 the people some of the person they have 0:33:47 that's all 0:33:48 so and then the ayah about the people of 0:33:51 the injeel that they should rule that's 0:33:53 what they will and the one who does not 0:33:55 do that is alpha 0:33:57 manifestly rebellious 0:33:59 so even if someone say this is only for 0:34:00 the people of india i think this is a 0:34:02 very weak point nobody really 0:34:04 respects to the scholarship 0:34:06 although some scholars say that it's 0:34:08 amazing that men say that but it should 0:34:10 not be really respected because only 0:34:11 points of view will have really meat and 0:34:13 they should be respected let's apply 0:34:15 only for the christian let's arrive for 0:34:17 the christian then for a greater reason 0:34:19 should apply for the one who have the 0:34:21 better book and the final book 0:34:23 so 0:34:24 al-kafir 0:34:26 if it applies to these previous nations 0:34:28 it should be applying to this ummah even 0:34:30 even fortunately and even stronger 0:34:33 can i uh submit a question on behalf of 0:34:36 you yeah because i don't know 0:34:39 no no you might be happy 0:34:42 you you know the character of giving us 0:34:44 um he finds it just very disrespectful 0:34:52 yeah all of that is just summarizing 0:34:54 that's an awesome question i'm just 0:34:56 summarizing what it was agreed upon by 0:34:58 by really respect for the scholar i 0:35:01 don't think shaykh or anyone present 0:35:03 except few odd scholars will say this is 0:35:05 a catholic is only forbade it is not for 0:35:07 us although some people live at that 0:35:09 time 0:35:10 a sahaba even had ever said remember 0:35:12 what our good brothers very sad for you 0:35:14 everything sweet is for you everything 0:35:16 is better for them 0:35:17 because you want them to wear caffeine 0:35:19 but you are out of that so this is this 0:35:21 is such i think her life did the right 0:35:24 way like he's a is a man of night 0:35:27 original video 0:35:29 will not go into such such play 0:35:31 playing games with words and just made a 0:35:33 mockery out of them what not what good 0:35:35 brothers are but it's like for you they 0:35:37 have everything bad and you have 0:35:38 everything sweet it doesn't work this 0:35:40 way if they have something 0:35:42 better should have the same bitterness 0:35:44 also 0:35:45 so if they are catherine if they don't 0:35:47 know that allah has revealed that then 0:35:48 you will be also if you got told 0:35:51 the quran which is better and more 0:35:52 comprehensive 0:35:54 by necessity so he was just mocking you 0:35:56 i think this is this point you should be 0:35:58 mocked they are not really of great only 0:35:59 some have said that even the time of 0:36:02 tabarin and sahaba some people 0:36:04 their uttering some answers like that it 0:36:06 was it was also not completely 0:36:08 impossible 0:36:10 so what what what what remains that's 0:36:12 really not worth because the phrase 0:36:15 is one of the most general 0:36:16 uh 0:36:20 statement of generality in the arabic 0:36:21 language and also in english with us on 0:36:23 who whoever is is most general whoever 0:36:26 for him this characteristic ablaze so 0:36:28 what remains is now that we have 0:36:31 that those who are all with that 0:36:33 not with that what allah has revealed 0:36:34 are kaffir rum 0:36:37 so how to put these is are they three 0:36:39 different categories or is one category 0:36:41 with the three titles 0:36:42 that's really where some scholarship is 0:36:44 worthy of 0:36:46 putting together 0:36:48 one attempt was to go the narration way 0:36:50 by claiming that if i said 0:36:52 this way 0:36:56 that is 0:36:58 based on the strong and solid narrations 0:37:00 which we have here details and the men 0:37:02 of the narration all of them first class 0:37:04 imams 0:37:05 that 0:37:06 those who have 0:37:07 reported that this is a statement of 0:37:09 abdullah with values he said that and 0:37:11 for some weekend 0:37:13 that had been 0:37:15 endorsed 0:37:17 have been submerged in the hadith of the 0:37:19 main tradition as if it is where the 0:37:22 state movement had burst that's called 0:37:23 idraj but actually is the same 0:37:27 now someone could say even if it is 0:37:29 himself 0:37:31 there is no authority but after the 0:37:32 prophet 0:37:33 it's just 0:37:46 that you 0:37:47 mediate for someone to that to the 0:37:50 government to get something which is 0:37:51 your life not in the disputed case in 0:37:53 the protocol you'll call that sort 0:37:56 and you take a gift this regard 0:37:59 and there's something we thought so it 0:38:01 is bribery in ruling 0:38:09 that's one one thing the way of 0:38:11 narration we have discussed that in 0:38:13 detail the narrations are very very 0:38:15 faulty and not respectable from the 0:38:17 sahaba there is nothing of wealth really 0:38:19 except the claim of the habas and that 0:38:21 one is is manifestly can be manifested 0:38:24 proven to be wrong as a narration 0:38:27 because we have the 0:38:29 the one with the best is not the 0:38:30 strongest and first-class narrative like 0:38:32 sufficient failure 0:38:35 etc which is the best standard mama 0:38:37 which clearly says this statement is 0:38:39 from abdullah bibus and for others who 0:38:42 made advantage in the main text 0:38:44 it's clear that this one shows that it 0:38:46 is afterlife but i was saying that is 0:38:48 the one who's dominant why because the 0:38:50 narrators are better the best class 0:38:52 narrator in this chain secondly because 0:38:55 they give us an extra knowledge and 0:38:56 extra phrase and that and the extra 0:38:59 narration of the first weather authority 0:39:01 should be taken on board because how can 0:39:03 how come that we take his original 0:39:04 narration and not his addition unless 0:39:07 there is a good reason to reject that 0:39:08 addition in that case there is no good 0:39:09 reason because this is the best 0:39:11 narration that's formulation point of 0:39:13 view so what remains is that some 0:39:15 scholars said now this is now where 0:39:17 really some scholarly and thick analysis 0:39:20 of this point 0:39:21 is that what it may be 0:39:23 the only remaining points i'm going to 0:39:24 say 0:39:25 actually the three three categories of 0:39:29 people who rule with that not with that 0:39:31 what allah has developed 0:39:33 first category the one who are cafe rule 0:39:36 they must have something extra they're 0:39:38 not just their ruling which makes them 0:39:40 cut road 0:39:45 one major exponent and personality and 0:39:48 this is a probably himself in his tafsir 0:39:50 he said 0:39:51 because 0:39:53 because of the statement of the zaid and 0:39:55 because of his analysis of the meaning 0:39:57 of iman and kufa 0:39:59 this is only those who 0:40:02 reject what allah has revealed 0:40:06 who know it is that 0:40:07 but publicly or the 0:40:18 not only just the mere act of not ruling 0:40:22 they must be jahidun 0:40:24 and you know what the arabic means 0:40:26 denial rejection 0:40:28 most likely he means rejection because 0:40:30 these are muslims 0:40:32 so they're not like the jehovah of the 0:40:33 people of who said who said publicly 0:40:36 musa is a liar 0:40:38 magician but in the bottom of the heart 0:40:40 know that he is not a magician not a 0:40:41 liar 0:40:44 this is not the same jacob 0:40:46 it could mean because these people did 0:40:47 not make any public they said this is 0:40:49 not the ruling of allah 0:40:54 so most likely he means the one who 0:40:55 rejects faith 0:40:57 with a please like this 0:41:00 foreign not going to comply i'm not 0:41:03 going to obey you i'm rejecting the 0:41:05 principle obedience to you without 0:41:07 saying 0:41:08 you see it is not your it's not your i'm 0:41:10 denying that it's your health i didn't 0:41:11 hear it that would be 0:41:13 more technically but he used 0:41:17 he is relying on the narrations 0:41:20 supporting the narration of asbah the 0:41:21 nazor 0:41:23 this sounds squarely reasonable it has 0:41:25 some sound necessarily 0:41:27 and i think also his 0:41:29 in the same category that he said these 0:41:31 are the ones who 0:41:43 they have 0:41:44 transgressed about other people's right 0:41:48 for example you make a ruling in which 0:41:49 someone takes someone's money without 0:41:51 justification or someone is killed 0:41:53 without justification that will be a 0:41:54 problem also 0:41:56 and 0:41:57 if there's no one there are many rulings 0:41:59 which the 0:42:00 embalming 0:42:02 many cases you could imagine fatwa 0:42:04 ruling which does not end the world but 0:42:06 violation by living with allah that 0:42:08 would be then fisk would be disobedient 0:42:11 so those who do that and there's 0:42:14 and um and uh 0:42:17 they are they are committing fisk 0:42:19 and the catholic only the one who has an 0:42:21 issue of 0:42:22 an issue or belief and risk of rejection 0:42:25 or relationship technique or a doubt 0:42:28 doubting that that's the ruling of allah 0:42:29 or publicly they may be one african 0:42:31 claim to a muslim but at the bottom of 0:42:33 their heart they don't believe that 0:42:34 would be only in the catherine 0:42:36 and then authorities with that that 0:42:38 allah gave three different titles 0:42:40 descriptions which we have to find three 0:42:43 different groups to which it fit 0:42:45 it sounds 0:42:47 like a reasonable 0:42:49 like a reasonable approach 0:42:53 concerning the swab nuzu 0:42:55 just to summarize quickly there are two 0:42:57 main 0:42:58 narrations all of them say about this 0:43:00 one which is 0:43:01 narrated or this notes are excellent 0:43:04 there's no doubt about that is that this 0:43:06 is in the dispute between bani kolev and 0:43:08 berlin 0:43:10 they used to before muhammad sallam 0:43:11 arrived in medina but you know they used 0:43:13 to regard themselves as a higher caste 0:43:15 or a higher class of banisa or the both 0:43:18 of them are actually from levites are 0:43:20 from haroon 0:43:21 both of them from holland 0:43:24 but when the little guardians are higher 0:43:27 somehow in status so they arranged since 0:43:30 jahiliyyah that if 0:43:32 one of the killed one from barinar he 0:43:34 pays a full deal of hundred camels or 0:43:36 hundred wisconsin whatever 100 measure 0:43:38 of dates because they have for every 0:43:40 coming a certain measure of date 0:43:42 substituted for it 0:43:43 but if a navier kills the quality he 0:43:45 pays only 50 so so that the quality is 0:43:48 half 0:43:49 half a human being compared to another 0:43:52 now after 0:44:07 the blood money 0:44:08 100 0:44:10 what the caller said are you mental 0:44:12 just film a few years ago 0:44:14 one of you had asked one of us and you 0:44:16 paid us only 50.0:44:18 how come you're going to pay your 0:44:19 hundred 0:44:20 they said this is well established you 0:44:22 know that since hundred of you said yeah 0:44:25 yes this was established in time past 0:44:26 but now muhammad has arrived in medina 0:44:29 and i don't think he will approve this 0:44:31 kind of law 0:44:33 so 0:44:41 so the nadiri went back home analyzing 0:44:43 the situation so let us go to muhammad 0:44:44 as his point of view he is now the 0:44:45 master of medina he's the new ruler 0:44:48 let's refer to him see what he says and 0:44:50 he claims to be a prophet that's also an 0:44:52 addition tradition no point in our favor 0:44:54 so one time they discussed 0:44:56 that said you know very well that you 0:44:58 did not do that in time but except by 0:45:00 oppression by those muslims that's the 0:45:06 did you hear ever any two people from 0:45:08 the same grandfather have differed yes 0:45:10 have you ever done something stupid and 0:45:13 just like that that can't be that's not 0:45:14 possible 0:45:16 and you know that so they agreed to send 0:45:18 someone to sound the process and test 0:45:20 him what he would say in such a 0:45:22 situation just ask him that you really 0:45:23 the question has a theoretical question 0:45:25 and that's what the i address before 0:45:27 they will come and ask you and check if 0:45:29 you get for the answer you like then go 0:45:31 to muhammad if you don't like the answer 0:45:32 no we're not going to muhammad we don't 0:45:33 believe in him we have our own dough so 0:45:36 that's the trick that's 0:45:37 narrating 0:45:39 and the other more famous narration 0:45:40 which many people will quote actually 0:45:42 which is not the more befitting 0:45:45 is that the issue of adultery that a jew 0:45:47 committed adultery with the jews and 0:45:49 they put both all donkey and black in 0:45:51 their faces 0:45:54 and therefore 0:45:54 saw them 0:45:55 guiding them around say what what's 0:45:57 going on you said it is committed 0:45:59 adultery and then 0:46:01 the law is that we blackened them 0:46:04 each 0:46:05 h100 lashes and black in their basin put 0:46:07 them on a donkey and carry them around 0:46:09 the city as a standardization said is 0:46:11 that what you find at all they said yes 0:46:13 so he went to their ass to their house 0:46:16 they got the torah 0:46:18 and one of them read it he covered the 0:46:20 ayah or the verse of rajman before and 0:46:21 after and one of the converted jews or 0:46:24 one who knows them doesn't need to have 0:46:26 converted jews or maybe one of the 0:46:28 sahaba because the way will carb used to 0:46:30 be a jew before he became muslim 0:46:32 although he's ansari not because the 0:46:34 arabs used to 0:46:35 in the case they 0:46:37 a woman has too many dead 0:46:39 sons and so on she used to make an oath 0:46:42 that if my son grows up 0:46:44 does not die i will give him to the jews 0:46:45 to be educated as a jewish scholar maybe 0:46:49 anyway one of the presidents said let 0:46:50 him lift his hand and read the ayah he's 0:46:52 covered and left the hand 0:46:54 the scandal was clear it was strong 0:46:57 very well known just go to the old 0:46:59 testament it's stolen 0:47:01 so that's the narration of 0:47:03 which is in buhari 0:47:06 know that this is an authentic narration 0:47:07 there's not there's no doubt about 0:47:18 not discussing adultery and story so 0:47:20 most likely the narration of 0:47:23 mentioned the real original story 0:47:25 where the i was revealed a letter on the 0:47:27 ayah may have been read by another 0:47:29 context because they do not rule that 0:47:31 allah 0:47:33 in either case if you look there is no 0:47:35 jail because they said you know this is 0:47:37 we taken it by operation they don't say 0:47:39 this is not the rule of allah they know 0:47:40 they are violating the law of allah and 0:47:42 they took it by oppression by armstrong 0:47:44 not by any justification of the reveal 0:47:46 though in the case of of the stoning of 0:47:49 that 0:47:49 some insisted and they were stoned and 0:47:52 the stories were known in bukhari 0:47:58 i am the one who revived your law after 0:48:00 they have made him to die out so they 0:48:02 were not rejecting the law of allah in 0:48:03 this year they were just letting it 0:48:05 collapse and then he would ask them even 0:48:06 in the narration in one generation 0:48:10 why did you 0:48:12 uh do that see our kingdom is gone we 0:48:15 don't have power 0:48:16 and if we don't have power it's very 0:48:17 difficult if you don't have all to 0:48:19 exercise the death penalty sometimes you 0:48:21 have they have under the aroma the lover 0:48:22 gave them the right to build their 0:48:24 penalty that's the reason they conspired 0:48:25 against frieza so they have second off 0:48:28 and secondly another excuse that one of 0:48:30 our uh uh 0:48:32 our king's his son committed the 0:48:34 adultery and 0:48:35 we wanted to stone him for everyone else 0:48:37 but the king objected and said it's not 0:48:39 possible that your son get away anyone 0:48:41 so we agreed on a very rational secular 0:48:44 solution and the glasses for everyone 0:48:46 king son or otherwise so this is this is 0:48:48 the but even at the end say 0:48:51 because the ayah talks about kassas and 0:48:53 about bloodshed and eye for i and so on 0:48:55 it looks more befitting for the story of 0:48:57 bali nadira madikoya independent either 0:48:59 one if you look at the story 0:49:01 and none of them is there's any 0:49:02 technique but you know they even said 0:49:04 you know that's not at all 0:49:06 you just took it by oppression by volume 0:49:09 you are unjust your 0:49:11 uh next of kin panic 0:49:13 you're just unjust a reminder 0:49:15 you are benefiting from that you are a 0:49:16 more powerful tribe and have maybe more 0:49:18 fighter and you can enforce that by 0:49:19 force that's it it's not the law you 0:49:21 know that the law is not like that i 0:49:22 know that the the year or the blood 0:49:25 money would be equal especially since 0:49:26 both of you are from the descendant of 0:49:28 harun for the same even sub-tribe of an 0:49:32 israelite there are only whites and even 0:49:33 the son of both of them because we know 0:49:35 that 0:49:39 and she is 0:49:41 she is from there 0:49:45 your grandfather is harold so she's 0:49:47 around here and that is even higher so 0:49:49 it must be also from harold and they are 0:49:51 they're having scribes and scholars and 0:49:53 usually these are priest prista classes 0:49:55 from santa barbara so they're even from 0:49:57 the same grandfather not only from 0:49:59 banister even from closer one 0:50:02 so 0:50:04 based on the stories if you analyze the 0:50:06 stories there's no nothing of the creep 0:50:08 nothing of jad nobody ever said 0:50:11 we don't believe that the torah is the 0:50:13 torah is that they never said the torah 0:50:14 said otherwise yes they put their hand 0:50:16 to to cover the scandal but the moment 0:50:18 the heart was lifted they said it was 0:50:20 over our kingdom went and we just let 0:50:22 that low lapse die out by not 0:50:24 application by leaving it without any 0:50:26 application so de facto not applying it 0:50:29 by let it die by avoiding to apply it 0:50:31 until it died out and became even nobody 0:50:33 became conscious about its existence for 0:50:36 no application so that the jai had 0:50:38 taken is not clearly there 0:50:41 it is not clearly also in the text of 0:50:43 the 0:50:44 of the uh 0:50:45 of the 0:50:47 of the quran there is nothing about the 0:50:49 jew because the quran used the word 0:50:51 use the word technique everywhere it's 0:50:53 not the 0:50:54 words or or phrases the quran does not 0:50:56 use in there 0:50:57 and there's also no change of share and 0:51:00 it's not some other said no there's only 0:51:02 the one who should change the sharia 0:51:04 the one who changes 0:51:11 claim to be applying that sharia but 0:51:13 they misapplied out of mischievousness 0:51:15 or obliged 0:51:17 they are not catherine 0:51:20 but they're valid 0:51:48 in its musical sounding in the ears so 0:51:51 it's not abdil sharya it's not the issue 0:51:53 of sharia so there is just 0:51:56 as clarified by the word hokum used its 0:51:59 way in the quran so that that approach 0:52:01 an attempt to rely on on on 0:52:05 asbab new zulu 0:52:07 to show that the sound is indicated only 0:52:09 the case of jihad 0:52:11 is not 0:52:13 this comment 0:52:14 they let hakam die did not apply it 0:52:16 until it lapses that's not yet and this 0:52:19 is not a beach area let's just let it 0:52:21 die 0:52:22 it's one time of changing the sharia i 0:52:24 would not change it there deliberately 0:52:26 let don't apply it for a long time until 0:52:28 it dies out and then you find another 0:52:29 solution we should claim that's what is 0:52:31 the torah to the common people 0:52:33 so 0:52:34 that's not very convincing 0:52:36 the claim of for example has helped here 0:52:39 for example which seems to be scholarly 0:52:41 well developed is that 0:52:43 there must be three different categories 0:52:45 where there's three different 0:52:46 descriptions but this is also not very 0:52:48 convincing at least the two the two 0:52:50 others like for example if you are 0:52:52 valium 0:52:53 you are also fast 0:52:55 so you cannot deny that these two 0:52:57 categories 0:52:58 coalesce 0:53:13 that's right yeah hang on a minute 0:53:15 is 0:53:16 if somebody 0:53:18 yeah he does not have if someone does 0:53:21 not is he careful 0:53:23 like a judge no no like somebody in the 0:53:26 jungle 0:53:27 in a desert 0:53:29 has 0:53:30 never 0:53:31 had 0:53:32 the revolution i don't think this is an 0:53:33 issue there 0:53:35 well 0:53:36 this is this a matter of below this had 0:53:39 nothing to do with that right elias 0:53:41 would disagree with what you said last 0:53:43 week which is 0:53:45 if somebody is in a desert yeah the law 0:53:48 has not been revealed to him yep okay 0:53:51 your side of the argument is 0:53:53 if somebody has not uh had something 0:53:56 revealed to him and he's judging or he's 0:53:59 making hookum he is still committing 0:54:01 ship 0:54:02 yeah yeah we were discussing that last 0:54:04 week yeah he is committing sure yeah 0:54:06 okay whereas illya's saying no if 0:54:09 somebody is in the desert or he is in 0:54:11 the jungle and he's making hukum 0:54:14 he is not committing shirk 0:54:16 because nothing has been revealed sure 0:54:19 hit him so his point is the point that 0:54:22 that that definition of sheikh is 0:54:23 depending upon the hukum reaching him no 0:54:26 for except someone in the jungle he did 0:54:27 not save any revelation 0:54:29 and he is worshiping an idol he's also 0:54:31 communication 0:54:32 okay this is that's the reality 0:54:35 the question is wrongly is it is 0:54:49 to make him 0:54:50 perish and having having uh having a no 0:54:54 no escape from hellfire or he has 0:54:55 another chance but this is another issue 0:54:57 he's in the middle of that you mean is 0:54:59 the reality of the act is it shirk 0:55:01 no i didn't say that that kid this one 0:55:03 is 0:55:04 and accepted the meaning of sheikh in 0:55:06 the german sense but it is according to 0:55:07 the ayakov 0:55:09 and he is a kafir in the title of kafir 0:55:11 in the meaning of dunya he does not he's 0:55:13 not ruling with that 0:55:14 and he's desiring the title 0:55:16 he's a 0:55:18 let's depend upon the responsibility 0:55:20 coming 0:55:21 but i think that i thought the issue was 0:55:23 if a muslim church 0:55:25 i thought this is the issue which is 0:55:27 very very very which is the point we 0:55:29 should be saying has a problem or a 0:55:30 muslim role there's like a muslim two 0:55:33 two issues there were two issues 0:55:35 it was that one about 0:55:37 the one is purely academically can we 0:55:39 describe that i said yeah we can 0:55:40 describe it as a shell 0:55:42 because 0:55:43 it in it ought to be that nobody should 0:55:46 all accept what allah has revealed to be 0:55:48 carrying the title of a believer but he 0:55:51 is not carrying that reversal 0:55:54 now he's a completely innocent cavalry 0:55:56 not responsible 0:55:57 he did not receive the answer he 0:55:59 disagrees with him okay that's one point 0:56:02 another issue i think it's more 0:56:03 important because this is this is i 0:56:05 think just the issue of naming and the 0:56:07 philosophical description it does is 0:56:10 does the description fit on this this 0:56:12 person does not fit just as an aiming 0:56:14 purpose 0:56:29 and obviously there some people say 0:56:32 according to mitha confront 0:56:34 become 0:56:36 is is not forgiven yeah 0:56:38 some of them but i think that the 0:56:40 majority of scholars and also the clear 0:56:42 evidence 0:56:57 has come 0:56:58 so 0:56:59 i i think this is this is a matter of 0:57:01 just the responsibility after receiving 0:57:03 the message or not to see if we are 0:57:04 missing as general about 0:57:06 what 0:57:09 the same would apply also for other sins 0:57:10 actually it has nothing to do with kavan 0:57:12 for example 0:57:13 is intoxicant and you may drink and you 0:57:15 become intoxicated 0:57:17 you did not receive the message you are 0:57:18 a new muslim somewhere in the border and 0:57:20 you notice in the message that hamlet's 0:57:22 word in islam 0:57:23 but you are intoxicated and you have 0:57:25 drunk humble nobody can deny that you 0:57:26 have a camera and you are now wobbling 0:57:28 right and left and unable to go a 0:57:30 straight line but the reality that 0:57:31 you're not responsible for for being 0:57:33 liable of the sharia punishment because 0:57:35 you don't know that is prohibited yet 0:57:38 did not change the reality 0:58:07 only if the message has been released 0:58:08 and the issue the only issue which which 0:58:10 some people had is that there's a 0:58:12 metaphor and the ayah says clearly that 0:58:14 you don't claim 0:58:16 you have been unaware about that 0:58:18 is that sufficient 0:58:22 because inside your heart and your brain 0:58:24 and this even have been proven now by by 0:58:27 by by brain's recession so that's what 0:58:29 the god complex that you 0:58:31 internally conceive that there's an 0:58:32 enormous power behind you which 0:58:39 i think more important is that a muslim 0:58:41 judge who knows this is the ruling of 0:58:43 allah in that case but he takes pride 0:58:45 and fix things publicly obviously to get 0:58:47 away because he will not do it publicly 0:58:49 clearly that he's leaving the ruling of 0:58:51 allah he will find that some kind of 0:58:52 excuse 0:58:53 fix the arguments fix the 0:58:56 the the the witnesses declare some 0:58:58 witness to be untrustworthy who knows 0:59:00 very well the earth or sweat he can play 0:59:02 that game and rules knowingly he is not 0:59:04 only with that what allah is evil in 0:59:05 that specific case is he with this mere 0:59:07 act 0:59:09 either motivated by bribe or motivated 0:59:11 by by a 0:59:12 relation of kin or greed for power is he 0:59:15 by the mere catherine or he's 0:59:27 comes here what he commented about the 0:59:29 muslim rulers in his time for mario 0:59:37 so these are two issues then two 0:59:38 separate issues 0:59:42 just he 0:59:44 i told him uh 0:59:46 we come for the lesson if there is any 0:59:49 i don't agree with many of these issues 0:59:51 yet but uh yes but uh it's 0:59:54 we didn't come to discuss really i told 0:59:56 him if we find the time insha'allah we 0:59:57 will talk about but you know 1:00:05 is really not because allah knows if 1:00:07 this without was enough so we don't need 1:00:09 to bother our head about 1:00:11 leave that to allah i usually have never 1:00:13 had any problems with that all this is 1:00:15 for human nature 1:00:17 in general humans would like to know 1:00:19 what would happen 1:00:20 which kind of test would be an echo fire 1:00:22 fire coming out and people jumping in it 1:00:24 according some hadith or they would be 1:00:26 just forgiven gohan you are forgiven and 1:00:29 all there's the many narrations all of 1:00:31 them give some of them give great hope 1:00:33 like one narration i just read a few 1:00:35 days ago i don't think it's not it's 1:00:37 very good but i didn't check it 1:00:38 that 1:00:40 some people commented on braille 1:00:42 which was at that time slave guild still 1:00:44 working for the families of wasallam and 1:00:47 rebuked there for something and said 1:00:49 muhammad allah will not benefit you 1:00:51 so russ was angry at him to the member 1:00:53 said who i am and 1:01:04 some people say i will not benefit 1:01:06 people who are close to me 1:01:08 they are mistaken i will have such a 1:01:10 jaffa 1:01:11 it is so wide so that iblees will switch 1:01:14 his neck hoping that he may be caught in 1:01:15 the shabbat this is just a metaphorical 1:01:17 explanation if 1:01:19 it's very that even the police will have 1:01:21 some time hope for the shave that he may 1:01:23 not 1:01:24 but 1:01:25 almost like that this is you know how 1:01:27 the arabic language is flowering 1:01:28 distinct as if like that 1:01:30 so even so uh 1:01:33 there are there you will find some 1:01:34 hadith which are extremely hopeful 1:01:37 and you have someone who is extremely 1:01:38 threatening 1:01:39 and everyone should be in between 1:01:42 and it's better to keep it like that 1:01:44 because if you give the real blank check 1:01:46 then you may lead them to their device 1:01:48 it's good to be always worried i'm not 1:01:49 doing exactly where's the child we leave 1:01:51 it to allah the other one 1:01:54 it is very important thing for to to for 1:01:56 the judge i would i think it's extremely 1:01:58 dangerous to have a theory telling the 1:02:00 judge you may take a bribe and you are 1:02:02 only a fascicle 1:02:05 i think this is a this is opening the 1:02:07 door 1:02:08 wide and and and and it may have given 1:02:12 many rulers 1:02:14 plenty of leeway to to be unjust until 1:02:16 trust gracing that they would say it's 1:02:18 just a physical plan you can make taobao 1:02:20 you are still hopeful that you may that 1:02:22 you have like 1:02:23 your heart sincerely from your heart i 1:02:25 would say that that point is more 1:02:26 important 1:02:28 um 1:02:29 your opinion 1:02:31 about the rulers today 1:02:33 um would you say that they are 1:02:36 classic 1:02:37 varnam or cathode 1:02:39 i i express that many times especially 1:02:42 with without brothers from jail don't 1:02:44 bother what the law is because the 1:02:46 hadith islam clarify the issue 1:02:49 from 1:02:49 they are ruling by prophet then the 1:02:51 system is containing clear statement of 1:02:53 prophet and the relation of islamic law 1:02:55 and islamic islamic 1:02:57 in a clear way in a definite and 1:02:59 undisputed way and that has to be 1:03:01 changed either they change from or they 1:03:03 will be removed by force in the usual 1:03:05 complicated process of of disputing with 1:03:07 them step by step and so on so 1:03:09 so saw the catholic no is it about it 1:03:12 well i mean 1:03:14 see some see some people say that it's 1:03:15 not available because if you say that 1:03:17 they're careful 1:03:18 if you're working to establish islam 1:03:20 again 1:03:21 they say if they're careful then your 1:03:23 method of removing them is different 1:03:26 whereas if they're muslim they're 1:03:27 mistaken they're thinking this so 1:03:28 mistake the mistake starting from this 1:03:30 point the point is different a ruler is 1:03:32 is is not applying stuff first of all if 1:03:35 he's a catholic himself like like he 1:03:37 says i am the atheist and so on that he 1:03:38 should not be ruling because we have 1:03:40 agreement with or between all scholars 1:03:50 this is the next step fighting him 1:03:52 against the resisting group yeah until 1:03:54 he sees and decision so there's no issue 1:03:56 there secondly if he claims to be a 1:03:58 muslim nominated muslim 1:04:00 and that you're ruling 1:04:03 this this statement of you for example 1:04:05 let us give a clear example which i 1:04:07 think i stick to it very very firmly and 1:04:09 regarded as 1:04:11 like uh like what they call it the acid 1:04:12 test for the gunners see your membership 1:04:15 in the united nations we accept the 1:04:16 covenant which contains clear conflict 1:04:18 definitely it's not just an 1:04:20 international agreement organizing the 1:04:22 interstate relations it is definitely 1:04:24 containing because the same in the state 1:04:26 you have to have these rights guys this 1:04:28 you know the combination of the united 1:04:30 nations 1:04:31 and as a member you have accepted that 1:04:33 and accepted that this is higher than 1:04:34 your own law and has to be enforced 1:04:36 internally 1:04:38 yeah by membership this is clear coffee 1:04:42 you say no no no it is 1:04:45 just like an international city 1:04:47 that's what i say we have it we have his 1:04:50 statement that we have even the voice 1:04:51 recording 1:04:53 is wrong because of this and this so 1:04:54 there will be a discussion 1:04:56 ultimately it will come to a clear point 1:04:59 that either he can bring sufficient 1:05:03 the wheel or or points of scholarly 1:05:05 point of view forward that we say there 1:05:08 may be a weak point of view there or he 1:05:11 cannot have any answer and we are the 1:05:12 other side convinced that there is a 1:05:14 comfortable for which we have evidence 1:05:16 from allah and that in the life 1:05:18 when we say we say you have to change it 1:05:20 you must change it immediately now 1:05:22 you must give them 1:05:24 this just knowledge maybe the notice is 1:05:25 six months it doesn't matter so like 1:05:27 when someone like 1:05:28 dies do you do janaza for him 1:05:31 i would avoid yes specifically okay 1:05:34 if any of the muslims 1:05:42 but does not mean i will not remove him 1:05:43 by force by the sword this is another 1:05:45 issue let us go go with the ruler now 1:05:47 because the practical aspect is that we 1:05:48 don't seek overboard that we have to 1:05:50 rule by islam not to do on someone janaz 1:05:53 you may know someone to be among you 1:05:55 personally and you avoid his janazah 1:05:57 like whatever you used to do 1:05:59 that's perfectly fine you don't need to 1:06:00 tell the other order i don't think it's 1:06:02 an issue i think this is a non-issue the 1:06:04 issue is that how to remove him now if 1:06:06 we insist and we are the one who argued 1:06:08 him convinced after a lengthy discussion 1:06:10 that his discussion may be weeks maybe 1:06:12 months maybe years we come to the 1:06:14 conclusion that he 1:06:15 is clearly covered why have he is 1:06:16 insisting and he doesn't want to get out 1:06:18 there and he has no excuse of duress 1:06:20 that for example 1:06:22 ships military ships at the border 1:06:24 threatening to to bomb the poor apart 1:06:26 and say i can't get out now okay like 1:06:29 this the ships are there and the news 1:06:30 media covering that that's an evidence 1:06:32 there's no problem 1:06:33 all of that is not there then he's 1:06:35 insisting on coffee 1:06:37 then for him you have to step aside 1:06:39 leave someone who's qualified who is 1:06:41 ruling by islam who's willing to rule 1:06:42 the sermon who are willing to tell the 1:06:44 gravitation bye bye 1:06:46 our exit take the invitation as an 1:06:48 example 1:06:50 we taking our exit from 1:06:52 he doesn't want to move obviously he's 1:06:54 running his own guards paris guards 1:06:57 imperial guards or royal guards or 1:06:59 whatever the name of gods or republican 1:07:02 gods because sometimes it's a republic 1:07:05 even a nominal one 1:07:07 then we can rally our people and start 1:07:09 fighting him in the fighting all people 1:07:11 fighting with him is a resisting group 1:07:13 which is protecting coverage has been 1:07:15 discussed publicly and aggravated and 1:07:17 for these if i kill them in the battle i 1:07:19 will not make janaz on them but if their 1:07:21 family think they are poor muslims and 1:07:22 they were misguided or they did not 1:07:24 understand the argument probably and 1:07:25 they make jeraz with them i'm not 1:07:26 praying i will myself not do 1:07:30 pray for them but their family can't 1:07:32 take them and pray i will not prevent 1:07:33 the family will take them to the masjid 1:07:34 representative why should i pray 1:07:37 what's fuss about that 1:07:38 i will not praise you these are the 1:07:40 existing group they are killed in the 1:07:41 battle for me they are killed as 1:07:43 murdered in the dunya 1:07:46 and the conclusion of that that i will 1:07:47 not praise another on them but his wife 1:07:49 said no he was a good man he is 1:07:51 simple-minded he didn't understand his 1:07:52 argument he thinks he's protecting the 1:07:54 state and the public order and he's 1:07:55 doing well okay 1:08:00 i'm no problem okay i will not get stuck 1:08:02 with that some jihadi will get stuck 1:08:04 with that because they are not 1:08:05 understanding what was the issue the 1:08:07 issue is that allah should be dominant 1:08:10 not that i praise another on you or your 1:08:11 praises on me this is secondary 1:08:14 i think i think what people want to hear 1:08:16 probably our brother is my head 1:08:19 there's a lot of confusion 1:08:20 um as you know salafi 1:08:23 and the other brothers the other groups 1:08:25 as to what constitute 1:08:27 that take you outside the hall of this 1:08:29 life 1:08:30 that we have this guy 1:08:32 outside for islam and is the current 1:08:34 rulers in the muslim world 1:08:36 or in the whole world 1:08:41 in the sense that it takes them outside 1:08:43 the fall of islam and their blood and 1:08:45 their wealth becomes halal on the muslim 1:08:48 no what what what what what's relevant 1:08:50 is because they put the question on 1:08:52 individual personality what that 1:08:54 question is that for example 1:08:56 for example the following analysis i 1:08:57 think is a strict and good analysis for 1:09:00 islam 1:09:01 in a very good analysis about this 1:09:02 regime 1:09:04 was an agent of the british and he 1:09:06 believed himself 1:09:09 in this bottom end of the health fire 1:09:11 but he did not say saudi arabia 1:09:13 until abdullah then acted this 1:09:15 nationality law and declared the saudi 1:09:17 kingdom in 1933.1:09:19 so although he believed he came from 1:09:20 kuwait 1:09:21 as a man african british agent and he's 1:09:23 really internally a catholic playing 1:09:25 playing the game the game of being a 1:09:26 believer but 1:09:28 publicly was only when that law was 1:09:30 enacted because of the nationality 1:09:47 a disagreement in in islamic history 1:09:49 until 1:09:50 once down that wherever you are you 1:09:52 immigrate to in the islamic domain 1:09:55 you sit even shattering to the extreme 1:09:56 that are me who comes in islam 1:09:59 for for trade and so on stays more than 1:10:01 one year he's forced to become a 1:10:02 diminisher he pays jesus you don't stay 1:10:04 it's either you become a citizen or you 1:10:05 get out just the opposite of the logic 1:10:07 of the the lowest body complete opposite 1:10:10 so that these laws are all clearly 1:10:12 confirmed 1:10:14 clearly which i think is a very good 1:10:16 achievement to show us his sharpness and 1:10:18 he is sticking to fundamentals with that 1:10:21 law 1:10:22 plus the claims out there to be an 1:10:23 inherited monarchy and this is the 1:10:25 decision ahead of me because i just 1:10:27 showed a counselor in mecca saying to 1:10:30 formulate a law of wrath 1:10:33 that has never been islamic history 1:10:35 anyone formulated 1:10:37 never 1:10:38 even 1:10:39 did not have a local athlete it was the 1:10:41 strongest one who take the throne and if 1:10:43 he says that he killed the others that's 1:10:45 not what i thrashed they're taking it by 1:10:46 force based on some misconceptions 1:10:49 but rather than genuinely 1:10:51 like that was never an islamic history 1:10:53 that contradicts the islamic principle 1:10:55 of government 1:10:56 fundamentally so based on the two say 1:10:59 from that day it became a covert domain 1:11:01 he didn't bother if otherwise is the 1:11:03 catholic north carolina public we should 1:11:04 pray for him 1:11:06 if you are attempting to remove him it 1:11:08 will come ultimately either he comes to 1:11:10 his senses and just resign which is very 1:11:12 unlikely but it happened a few times in 1:11:14 history 1:11:16 very rare or you fight him in the state 1:11:18 of fight he and his army are resisting 1:11:21 groups fighting it like for example we 1:11:23 have the issue 1:11:24 actually issue was difficult even for 1:11:25 the sahaba the issue of the ones who 1:11:27 prevented playing zika yeah 1:11:29 that was a major discussion between abu 1:11:31 bakr and 1:11:33 good 1:11:35 i don't think ahmad was discussing the 1:11:36 people who reverted to worshiping either 1:11:38 so believe it 1:11:53 um said i i wish i have asked me a lot 1:11:56 of people say we believe in zakat but we 1:11:58 don't give it to you can we fight them 1:12:00 or not 1:12:01 so almost the question this is narrated 1:12:03 by good is not from him 1:12:05 and he was backed by this question until 1:12:20 he was right what he did the nation was 1:12:22 completely right 1:12:24 for example when he came to term 1:12:26 and the famous story of the the room was 1:12:28 around that because 1:12:30 was 1:12:32 they have adam they have they have salad 1:12:34 everything but they refuse to pay zakah 1:12:35 and say you have to place account you 1:12:37 cannot just reject rejected submissive 1:12:39 to islamic law attitudes if you have a 1:12:41 dispute you go to the khalifah and sit 1:12:43 in a court there and discuss with them 1:12:45 you don't take the sword and prevent 1:12:47 the moment you pull this on you are out 1:12:49 you are resisting islamic law 1:12:52 yeah but what if he doesn't know this is 1:12:54 the islamic law if it is no he has to be 1:12:56 that he said we don't know what's your 1:12:58 argument but they were they said they 1:12:59 were sending it 1:13:00 they may listen to the argument and 1:13:02 understand it in different ways 1:13:04 i mean people have different 1:13:06 understanding behind 1:13:08 i think the hokum 1:13:10 the understanding of hokum here is 1:13:13 everybody who have translated this ayah 1:13:15 or understood it from 1:13:23 first you have to understand that the 1:13:25 people who and 1:13:26 were arguing this ayah mostly are also 1:13:35 are the closest people to arsenal 1:13:37 and they are not really 1:13:39 you can't say that they are wrong 1:13:41 when they say iman 1:13:43 is in the heart 1:13:45 meaning a person will never be covered 1:13:47 except 1:13:49 there is the element of heart 1:13:51 no matter what you do 1:13:56 and this is 1:13:57 yes except in case of ikra yeah 1:14:00 now this is what al sununu has taken as 1:14:04 a general rule everybody who does 1:14:06 something that is called kufr 1:14:08 then this person is a kafir 1:14:10 unless 1:14:12 there is he has been forced to 1:14:14 okay what about the person 1:14:17 insulting the religion which is kufr 1:14:21 if he knows what he is saying that's 1:14:23 been his heart yeah assuming what if he 1:14:26 is drunk what if he is so happy and says 1:14:29 allah you are my slave i am your lord 1:14:32 so this is not only he has not been 1:14:33 forced 1:14:35 so 1:14:36 if the heart is not there you are not 1:14:38 thinking if you have no intention 1:14:40 the action by itself 1:14:43 is not cough 1:14:44 this is what 1:14:46 has done when he sent the letter to 1:14:50 inform spying against the prophet 1:14:53 and then when he said when he gave his 1:14:55 excuse what did he say he said 1:14:58 o allah prophet by allah i have not 1:15:01 become 1:15:03 a kafir 1:15:05 and it's not that i wanted to change my 1:15:07 religion 1:15:08 now the people who say this is before 1:15:10 happened because he was 1:15:12 from the people of badr 1:15:15 he says definitely 1:15:17 has no merit this this idea here because 1:15:20 the prophet said he said the truth when 1:15:22 he say they have not changed their 1:15:23 religion the prophet said 1:15:25 he said so he was still a muslim 1:15:28 and allah doesn't forgive shirk and kuf 1:15:31 to anyone including the people of badr 1:15:34 because the prophet who is from the 1:15:35 people of badr allah 1:15:50 by itself a word that you say or an 1:15:53 action that you do is not covered unless 1:15:56 it is first cover in the heart 1:15:59 i mean once someone stand up and start 1:16:01 to start swearing at allah and this 1:16:03 prophet why is he doing it i mean he has 1:16:06 no respect if you understand if you 1:16:08 understand what you are saying that he 1:16:10 knows 1:16:11 he doesn't know what he is saying 1:16:14 because he is drunk 1:16:16 because he doesn't know these words 1:16:18 because it's not his language he heard 1:16:19 some words and he's repeating them 1:16:21 if he is saying them but we are saying 1:16:24 he is not capital because he doesn't 1:16:25 know what he is saying 1:16:27 so until he say it with his heart before 1:16:29 he said with his thunk 1:16:30 but you never know is how we'll say yeah 1:16:37 that's what the prophet did when he saw 1:16:39 a man do a sending a letter to the 1:16:41 kuffar he called him and asked him 1:16:44 why did you do this so you have to ask 1:16:46 people 1:17:01 are the kafirs the volume the faster 1:17:03 this is definitely 1:17:05 lost 1:17:13 so this ayah doesn't contradict this 1:17:16 allah says 1:17:20 we have revealed to you clear signs 1:17:23 nobody will reject it except the facets 1:17:55 who doesn't whoever doesn't judge with 1:17:58 what allah has revealed 1:18:00 and when he is explaining the ayah he is 1:18:02 explaining the ayah he's saying whoever 1:18:04 rules with other than what allah has 1:18:07 revealed 1:18:08 that is wrong the ayah doesn't say 1:18:10 whoever rules with what allah other than 1:18:12 allah is not true he says it doesn't do 1:18:14 it at all so do you say that someone you 1:18:17 go to somebody and say judge between me 1:18:19 and this person or 1:18:21 and then you say no i'm not interested 1:18:23 this person is catholic this is merely 1:18:26 suitable an action this is not doing 1:18:28 something it's not even doing something 1:18:29 it's not doing anything 1:18:32 how can this person be a kafir 1:18:34 a person who is not doing anything 1:18:38 so this hokum you have to go to the 1:18:40 arabic language what is the word hakum 1:18:42 in arabic language in arabic language 1:18:45 what happened means 1:18:46 attributing something to something 1:18:49 attributing something to something if i 1:18:51 say 1:18:52 this cup is yours i have made a judgment 1:18:56 this is judgment this is hope 1:18:58 so 1:18:59 and hokum is 1:19:02 it's allah who make the hokum 1:19:06 nobody has the right to do help him 1:19:07 accept allah 1:19:10 now when i make my heart 1:19:13 and this is the only meaning of this 1:19:15 ayah 1:19:17 if i tell you if you ask me about is 1:19:20 alcohol harm i say alcohol is 1:19:23 halal 1:19:25 and you tell me what is your proof i say 1:19:27 i have looked at the quran and sunnah 1:19:30 and they couldn't find anything to say 1:19:32 that alcohol is haram 1:19:34 now here i am wrong definitely 1:19:36 but i am not a catholic i am a muslim 1:19:39 why because i am judging with quran and 1:19:42 sunnah with what allah has revealed 1:19:45 whoever doesn't rule with what allah has 1:19:46 revealed but i am ruling with 1:19:48 to reach this decision i went to the 1:19:51 quran and sunnah 1:19:52 but if you tell me 1:19:54 is alcohol haram or halal you ask 1:19:56 someone 1:19:58 and he say alcohol is haram 1:20:00 and you tell him what is the reason for 1:20:02 this he say 1:20:04 the uan 1:20:05 and the doctors and the miracles and the 1:20:09 common sense 1:20:11 says that this is forbidden people 1:20:13 shouldn't drink it and you say okay what 1:20:15 about quran oh i don't care what quran 1:20:17 says but this is 1:20:19 this person even though he said exactly 1:20:21 what the quran has said he is a catholic 1:20:23 because he didn't go to allah for 1:20:26 the help of allah this is 1:20:29 if you believe that the man that allah 1:20:31 has chosen as a prophet is a prophet 1:20:34 if you 1:20:35 believe that the person that allah has 1:20:37 chosen as his enemy is his enemy 1:20:41 if you believe that what allah has made 1:20:42 haram is haram 1:20:44 if you believe that what allah made 1:20:45 halal is if allah say this is good and 1:20:48 you say this is good this is bad you say 1:20:50 this is bad you have judged with what 1:20:52 allah has revealed 1:20:53 if you do the opposite you have not 1:20:56 judged with what allah has repeated as 1:20:58 the hadith when we say 1:21:01 this is a big mistake 1:21:04 this ayah was revealed because of this 1:21:06 story or this ayah was revealed for this 1:21:08 story now the hadith 1:21:11 which is in bukhari he never said that 1:21:13 the prophet was there 1:21:16 when this 1:21:17 ayah was revealed about the two jew who 1:21:20 committed adultery 1:21:21 that the prophet then the why came 1:21:24 and he saw the state of 1:21:27 revelation coming to him and he stood up 1:21:29 and he read he didn't say that 1:21:31 and we find the sahaba taking one ayah 1:21:34 and everybody will say one sahabi will 1:21:36 say this i was living for this reason 1:21:38 and other sahabi as the story of bin 1:21:40 abbas as well is totally invalid why 1:21:43 because you know abbas 1:21:45 when he came to madina he was eight 1:21:48 then in navier 1:21:50 were had no power by the time he came he 1:21:54 had no say to take spend already so 1:21:57 we don't know where he took it from we 1:21:59 don't know where he took this story and 1:22:00 we find if you take 1:22:02 the morsel hadith what we say 1:22:05 it shouldn't be taken from the tab 1:22:07 neither from the sahabi it's the same 1:22:08 reason that we don't take it from this 1:22:10 table we shouldn't take it from the 1:22:12 sahabi if we take the morsel of the 1:22:13 sahabi you will find that the sahaba 1:22:15 means 1:22:17 committed adultery because they heard 1:22:18 from the hypocrites 1:22:21 the minister 1:22:23 he had his brother who came to him and 1:22:24 knocked on the door he said the prophet 1:22:26 divorced his wife 1:22:28 this is a muslim 1:22:31 answer 1:22:33 to the prophet did you divorce yourself 1:22:35 no 1:22:36 the prophet was told 1:22:38 um habiba the daughter of apostle and 1:22:40 was told that the prophet is going to 1:22:42 marry 1:22:43 his daughter 1:22:44 his 1:22:45 niece 1:22:46 zainab 1:22:47 miseram 1:22:49 when she asked him 1:22:50 we are saying we are have been told 1:22:53 that you are going to marry zainab say 1:22:56 who told you that she is my niece 1:22:59 her i i had breastfeeding with her 1:23:01 brother with her father understand so we 1:23:04 don't take the hadith or the guess of 1:23:07 that this ayah was revealed for this and 1:23:09 this ayah if you look at it it just 1:23:12 allah is to consider what allah said is 1:23:16 right right and what allah said wrong is 1:23:18 wrong 1:23:19 as for the leaders 1:23:21 as the sheikh said 1:23:22 it's irrelevant whether or not of course 1:23:25 someone who 1:23:27 makes hakum and says 1:23:30 someone who says 1:23:31 who has 1:23:33 these banks 1:23:36 these banks they have to have law 1:23:40 and this law will say it is wrong 1:23:44 not to pay to 1:23:45 usually it is right to 1:23:48 his right is wrong you see the word 1:23:50 haram halal this is 1:23:53 obligation 1:23:54 the prophet mostly there are some of 1:23:56 these words that are not like 1:24:01 it was not widely used it just to say 1:24:03 this is right this is wrong 1:24:05 if allah say this is 1:24:07 for what you are saying is right if 1:24:09 allah said is wrong 1:24:11 then what you want more from to say this 1:24:13 person here is contradicting allah as 1:24:16 long as this person knows of course who 1:24:17 doesn't know that 1:24:19 usually is haram 1:24:21 and then when he says 1:24:22 he take you and because he take you from 1:24:24 one court to another to civil court and 1:24:26 then in that book there when you stand 1:24:29 up in the court he will not say 1:24:31 oh yeah you are right not paying ajari 1:24:34 but we are 1:24:35 uh here we are uh 1:24:37 oppressors who are going to take you to 1:24:40 prison anyway no they are not going to 1:24:41 say this we are going to say you are 1:24:44 criminal yeah you understand and this 1:24:46 calling a muslim a criminal is proof 1:24:50 unless 1:24:51 uh 1:24:52 this person come and say yo i don't 1:24:54 believe they don't but he never say that 1:24:56 they never say that but do they have to 1:24:58 i mean but what if they are doing 1:24:59 interactions you know i mean if someone 1:25:01 is actively replacing one of allah a man 1:25:05 done something in the time of the 1:25:06 prophet the prophet called him 1:25:08 and asked him 1:25:09 i mean you will be you will never be 1:25:11 able to go and open someone's heart to 1:25:14 look inside so it's his tongue 1:25:17 to say what he has in his heart and they 1:25:19 are saying it but these 1:25:21 are saying that we are right 1:25:23 what we are doing is right 1:25:25 but still let's say they are they have 1:25:27 not 1:25:28 they are not kafirs these people are not 1:25:31 cafe 1:25:33 who obliged you 1:25:35 to obey anybody you see 1:25:37 obligation in the religion is only what 1:25:40 allah made obligation haram in the 1:25:43 religion is only what allah made haram 1:25:45 and allah says 1:25:49 allah has explained to you in details 1:25:51 what is forbidden for you 1:25:53 now 1:25:54 i say i don't want to do to obey any of 1:25:57 these leaders 1:25:58 do you have the proof to tell me that i 1:26:00 am doing wrong 1:26:02 if you have proof show me after allah 1:26:04 rasulullah 1:26:06 obey allah and obey the prophet 1:26:09 and those in charge of authority okay 1:26:12 who else are in charge of authority 1:26:14 you are a group of people here 1:26:16 in a room now i take 1:26:19 clashing off and say okay i am in charge 1:26:21 of authority now you are under my rule 1:26:25 or you tell me it's not the room is not 1:26:27 big enough 1:26:28 how big enough bahrain 1:26:32 how how how big it should be 1:26:34 vatican like what is the limit 1:26:38 no 1:26:39 uh the uh though all these people are 1:26:41 just guns who have taken power and have 1:26:44 enslaved people 1:26:46 the uh to 1:26:48 allah 1:26:56 and then the prophet explained what is 1:26:58 the answer he said 1:27:01 this matter isn't foreign 1:27:05 or not 1:27:06 still 1:27:08 the uh matter of 1:27:11 fact 1:27:13 these 1:27:13 different countries 1:27:16 it's an islamic 1:27:18 uh you will be accusing 1:27:20 uh ali 1:27:22 of being uh someone who was 1:27:25 running after power 1:27:28 because he fought with maori he could 1:27:29 have said yeah you are in s 1:27:34 i mean two leaders 1:27:36 why 1:27:37 killing the muslims this was if someone 1:27:39 takes ijmaar this was ichman 1:27:42 before never the muslim accepted 1:27:45 that to have two leaders 1:27:47 speak even at the time of 1:27:49 when when the prophet died when they 1:27:51 wanted the ansar wanted the leader from 1:27:53 that side and the muhajiroun from that 1:27:55 side they said no it has to be one and 1:27:57 then 1:28:01 one nation and one leader 1:28:03 so 1:28:04 any 1:28:05 uh and the the prophet have clearly 1:28:07 explained here 1:28:09 that the only armor that we have to obey 1:28:12 are the people of quraish that is the 1:28:14 khalifa the one person 1:28:17 when this person is not 1:28:19 there 1:28:20 like the prophet said 1:28:24 when there is no leader 1:28:28 these people have no status whether they 1:28:30 are muslim 1:28:33 they are 1:28:34 but if they were muslim 1:28:36 then they are just gangs i mean what 1:28:39 made 1:28:41 the king of bahrain 1:28:43 and bahrain is smaller than waziristan 1:28:47 yeah for this for the 1:28:49 saludi for example who recognize the 1:28:51 king of bahrain as someone that you 1:28:52 can't go against 1:28:54 why not osama bin laden he has more 1:28:56 control in waziristan 1:29:00 it's bigger than bahrain 1:29:01 what is what is the 1:29:04 what is the definition of the ruler 1:29:07 someone who is recognized by the 1:29:09 because you are supposed to reject the 1:29:11 uh and anything that comes from the u.n 1:29:16 so 1:29:17 if they don't act if they accept this 1:29:19 rule about 1:29:21 anyone who takes control anyone who 1:29:23 comes anyone who comes in in riyadh for 1:29:26 example taking a shopping center 1:29:29 and holding people hostage inside you 1:29:31 have to make bear with him and say yeah 1:29:33 this is leader he has he has power and 1:29:36 we have to follow him 1:29:41 i think 1:29:42 if you follow the quran 1:29:44 just quran sunnah it will be 1:29:47 clear that this is really 1:30:04 you

Not Ruling by What Allah has Revealed - Part1.avi (2012-02-12) ​

Description ​

Summary of Not Ruling by What Allah has Revealed - Part1.avi ​