Skip to content
On this page

Atheists and the Value of Truth | Podcast Highlight (2021-06-04)

Description

New atheists like Richard Dawkins view science as the "knight in shining armour" that saves humanity from the ashes of the dark ages to the enlightenment of scientific truth. But what exactly is the value of truth - scientific or otherwise - in the absence of objective meaning?

Full video: https://youtu.be/bdE6cyUtcOI

Thought Adventure Support â—„ PayPal - https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=6KZWK75RB23RN â—„ YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/ThoughtAdventurePodcast/join â—„ PATREON - https://www.patreon.com/thoughtadventurepodcast


Thought Adventure Social Media ◄ Twitter: https://twitter.com/T_A_Podcast​​@T_A_Podcast ◄ Clubhouse https://www.clubhouse.com/club/thought-adventure-podcast ◄ Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7x4UVfTz9QX8KVdEXquDUC ◄ Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/ThoughtAdventurePodcast ◄ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ThoughtAdventurePodcast​


The Hosts:

Jake Brancatella, The Muslim Metaphysician


Yusuf Ponders, The Pondering Soul


Sharif


Abdulrahman


Admin

Riyad Gmail: hello.tapodcast@gmail.com

#Atheist #Nihilism #Dawkins

Summary of Atheists and the Value of Truth | Podcast Highlight

*This summary is AI generated - there may be inaccuracies.

00:00:00 - 00:10:00

discusses Nietzsche's view that truth is not important for organisms and humans, and that meaning is subjective and relative. He also believes that morality is vigilant on the physical and that humans can be non-reductive physicalists and non-naturalists.

00:00:00 Nietzsche argues that the desire for truth and the pursuit of understanding is something that was derived from Christianity, specifically from the idea of a wise being ordering the world. He says that this moral drive has ended up undermining the very system that gave rise to that desire, Christianity. He argues that, while truth may still be valuable in some cases, it is not always so and is only valuable based on various benefits.

  • 00:05:00 Nietzsche argued that truth is not important for organisms and humans, and that meaning is subjective and relative. He also believed that morality is vigilant on the physical and that humans can be non-reductive physicalists and non-naturalists.
  • *00:10:00 Discusses the concept of nihilism and how it can impact one's view of life. If nihilism is at the foundation of one's worldview, it becomes difficult to find any meaning in life.

Full transcript with timestamps: CLICK TO EXPAND

0:00:08 mentioned
0:00:09 science being underpinned so the way
0:00:10 nietzsche sort of sees
0:00:12 science he looks at science as the the
0:00:14 corpse of christianity
0:00:16 so science for him isn't the this thing
0:00:19 that sort of
0:00:20 you know like you you see religion like
0:00:22 dawkins puts it as if religion's this
0:00:24 big nasty dragon and it's
0:00:26 trying to kill everything and then
0:00:27 you've got um the
0:00:29 the knight in shining armor that just
0:00:31 rides over the horizon on his
0:00:34 his glorious steed and like and this is
0:00:37 science and then it runs over and it
0:00:39 defeats
0:00:40 the dragon and it's like yes and they
0:00:42 paint you you get it a lot
0:00:44 from these sort of um new atheist types
0:00:48 that science is built up as this sort of
0:00:50 new being
0:00:51 that comes to defeat religion and it and
0:00:54 it's not that
0:00:55 it's not that it's it's quite the
0:00:57 opposite it is
0:00:58 what is left off religion um and they
0:01:01 don't see this and the way
0:01:02 nietzsche describes it he says like
0:01:04 listen the the desire for truth
0:01:06 seeing truth as a higher value is a
0:01:09 moral judgment
0:01:11 you have to see truth as good
0:01:15 you have to see truth as something that
0:01:17 good people want to attain
0:01:19 these are all moral statements and this
0:01:22 they all like he's arguing
0:01:23 in terms of the europeans they derived
0:01:25 this from the bible
0:01:27 they derived this from the religion and
0:01:29 he says this desire
0:01:31 to achieve to truth to look at the world
0:01:34 as if it's intelligible
0:01:36 this derived from christianity as well
0:01:38 in europe specifically
0:01:39 they saw the world as something that was
0:01:41 ordered
0:01:42 by a wise being and not as chaotic like
0:01:46 the greeks prior to
0:01:47 the you know the christian west um they
0:01:50 didn't see the world in the same way
0:01:52 they saw the world as
0:01:53 a very sort of chaotic place
0:01:56 not necessarily something that was
0:01:57 intelligible um
0:01:59 no it was a country christianity gave
0:02:01 rise to this
0:02:02 way of looking at the world and this
0:02:05 moral drive
0:02:06 that pushed them towards wanting to
0:02:07 achieve truth
0:02:09 but then it's sort of the the sting
0:02:12 turns itself against like the you know
0:02:14 the bee that stings itself
0:02:16 he says this moral um drive
0:02:19 that gave rise to the obsession with
0:02:21 truth
0:02:22 and reason in the west um
0:02:25 ended up undermining the very system
0:02:27 which gave rise to that moral drive that
0:02:29 is christianity
0:02:30 and so it kills itself um yeah but
0:02:34 um people are gonna i can imagine what
0:02:35 people are gonna say or atheists are
0:02:37 gonna say
0:02:38 well yeah obviously you know uh atheists
0:02:41 can value truth
0:02:43 yeah yeah no there's nothing there's
0:02:44 something uh that's
0:02:46 from christianity so how is the question
0:02:52 because the question here is is it
0:02:53 necessary why
0:02:55 do you need to value truth now within a
0:02:58 christian framework
0:02:59 it's like well you know if you don't
0:03:01 value truth you burn for an eternity
0:03:04 like in in terms of the atheist it's
0:03:07 instrumental now
0:03:08 it's like well what is the point of
0:03:10 valuing truth if it's just detrimental
0:03:12 to me and everyone i know
0:03:14 it you know and there is no necessary
0:03:17 drive it's like
0:03:18 you know it it becomes instrumental
0:03:21 basically and
0:03:22 yes there is still the possibility for
0:03:24 opening up but
0:03:25 there's nothing there's no like fear of
0:03:27 eternal damnation it's like
0:03:29 well if in this world all of
0:03:32 the positives lie in a false
0:03:35 notion or in a false um direction to
0:03:39 move towards
0:03:39 a lie then there's very little
0:03:42 motivation
0:03:43 if you think of it from a utilitarian
0:03:44 perspective like you move towards the
0:03:47 lie
0:03:48 then there's all of this pleasure that
0:03:49 derives from it if you move towards the
0:03:51 truth there's all of this pain and
0:03:52 there's suffering
0:03:54 like if you're a utilitarian and you're
0:03:56 you're fixed in the dunya you're fixed
0:03:58 in the world
0:03:59 at what point would you want to continue
0:04:01 to value truth there
0:04:03 it becomes you know if you don't believe
0:04:06 in
0:04:06 uh sort of any justice in an afterlife
0:04:10 it's like well you know why would you
0:04:12 keep on to this thing
0:04:14 if it's completely detrimental i get and
0:04:16 that's not to say
0:04:17 um obviously there's certain examples
0:04:19 where this might
0:04:20 be the case but there's it's just
0:04:24 it's not necessary it's basically the
0:04:25 point and because there's
0:04:28 yeah so from my understanding is that
0:04:29 when you turn around and ask the
0:04:30 question why should you value
0:04:32 truth uh a lot of people divorced of a
0:04:35 particular religious belief will turn
0:04:36 around and say
0:04:37 well it's beneficial it's beneficial for
0:04:41 going human beings it's not always yeah
0:04:42 that's right so what you're saying is
0:04:44 actually well okay if it wasn't
0:04:46 beneficial let's just say it wasn't
0:04:47 beneficial just for the
0:04:49 sake of the argument would it be still
0:04:52 valuable
0:04:53 and then you're saying well it's not
0:04:54 valuable anymore so then truth
0:04:56 is only valuable based upon various
0:04:59 benefits and then you can give examples
0:05:01 and i think even donald hoffman who's a
0:05:04 professor in
0:05:05 neuroscience and philosophy of science
0:05:07 he talks about
0:05:09 this idea that evolution adapts to
0:05:11 survival not adapts to truth-finding
0:05:15 so you know he gave a particular
0:05:17 mathematical model in which he
0:05:19 demonstrated how
0:05:20 an organism that is able to see reality
0:05:22 as it is is
0:05:24 less likely to survive than an organism
0:05:26 that's more adopted to survival
0:05:28 even if it's less correlated to truth so
0:05:31 truth-finding
0:05:32 is not necessary for organisms and human
0:05:36 beings in order to have benefit and so
0:05:38 he's basically
0:05:39 his argument is how we see the world is
0:05:41 not really
0:05:42 how the world is it's just how we've
0:05:45 evolved to perceive it
0:05:46 you know as like a user interface of the
0:05:49 world so
0:05:50 truth therefore becomes something that's
0:05:52 not even valued
0:05:54 as a necessary thing as as you mentioned
0:05:57 yourself
0:05:58 and if that i think i think if i could
0:06:00 just
0:06:01 if if i could just add to that shift the
0:06:02 the idea that the truth like the
0:06:06 truth seeking and why we ought to seek
0:06:07 truth right um
0:06:09 is it's it's not that um for
0:06:13 the the nihilist or or or or fernica
0:06:16 it's it's not that
0:06:17 it doesn't matter it's that it restricts
0:06:21 you
0:06:21 right so the the idea is that the
0:06:24 problem
0:06:25 when you guys seek truth it's gonna take
0:06:27 you to this
0:06:28 conclusion that these mythologies are
0:06:31 false
0:06:32 right that there is no true there is no
0:06:34 ultimate truth in the world that we
0:06:35 that you know gives us meaning and that
0:06:38 conclusion if truth does matter
0:06:40 you should follow the implications of
0:06:42 that truth
0:06:43 where it leads you to and you should
0:06:45 become a nihilist and just you know
0:06:47 and it's going to take you to very bad
0:06:48 places that's that's
0:06:50 that i think was nietzsche's idea and
0:06:52 that's why he didn't
0:06:54 truth wasn't the priority for him right
0:06:56 so for him it was like
0:06:57 okay truth matters but in as yusuf put
0:07:01 it in like a
0:07:02 instrumentalist manner like as far
0:07:05 as it helps you useful you know achieve
0:07:08 your drives right achieve
0:07:10 your your your desires and and uh and
0:07:13 but
0:07:13 that has serious implications for
0:07:16 morality for example right
0:07:18 and and it is at the end of the day like
0:07:20 like like there's
0:07:22 you know in terms of cosmic nihilism
0:07:24 right which is
0:07:25 which is an extreme version of
0:07:26 existential nihilism that does have a
0:07:29 huge psychological
0:07:30 implication on humans right the fact
0:07:32 that you're me your
0:07:33 your existence is utterly meaningless on
0:07:36 a cosmic scale
0:07:38 uh so if it's meaningless on a cosmic
0:07:40 scale why would you even
0:07:41 value meaning of truth for morality
0:07:45 on an individual skill yeah yeah the the
0:07:48 the idea is that the
0:07:49 existentialist tries to get out of this
0:07:51 by by by saying that what wait you're
0:07:53 you guys are ignoring the subjective
0:07:55 aspect
0:07:55 of meaning it's it's objective why why
0:07:57 why should it be relative to the cosmos
0:08:00 but then the problem is you're going to
0:08:01 be going in circles again you're back
0:08:03 where you started you're trying to
0:08:04 you again get to create this
0:08:06 metanarrative you can't however you are
0:08:08 going to try to create meaning
0:08:10 you will create this story this
0:08:13 mythology
0:08:14 about why a certain truth matters like
0:08:17 for example why happiness matters
0:08:19 and and you are going to stick to that
0:08:21 as some kind of transcendent truth
0:08:23 and and the issues you're going to face
0:08:25 if you're concerned with metaphysics and
0:08:27 truth
0:08:28 the difficulty of uh you know validating
0:08:32 such meaning
0:08:32 on a materialistic world i mean a lot of
0:08:35 people have attempted to do that i don't
0:08:37 want to
0:08:38 i don't excuse me i don't want to like
0:08:40 straw man or oversimplify
0:08:42 their position but in my view uh uh i
0:08:45 think it's very difficult to make it
0:08:46 work well i mean it's it's one of two
0:08:48 options you're either going to
0:08:50 say it's it's a it's a just it's a
0:08:52 useful fiction
0:08:54 or you're going to try to say to just
0:08:57 make some kind of uh you know ad hoc
0:08:59 assertion that it's just
0:09:02 it's just they're just like what what
0:09:04 some materials do with consciousness
0:09:05 that it just it's just an emergent
0:09:07 property with with no further
0:09:09 explanation required whatsoever so
0:09:10 morality just
0:09:12 is just super vigilant on the physical
0:09:14 and we can just call ourselves
0:09:15 non-reductive physicalists
0:09:17 and non-naturalists in that sense so
0:09:20 excuse me again
0:09:21 uh so so the problem that's that's i
0:09:23 think the problem it's not that truth
0:09:25 doesn't matter
0:09:26 it's that truth is going to lead us to
0:09:28 this you know this this
0:09:30 uh skepticism right this this
0:09:33 nihilism about the world right there's
0:09:34 there's no ultimate meaning and i think
0:09:36 that is the fundamental presumption that
0:09:39 that nietzsche has
0:09:40 i just want to add on what you said
0:09:41 there so this idea of it being
0:09:43 restrictive is is
0:09:45 a really really important point so it's
0:09:48 like when it comes to someone because
0:09:49 nietzsche's whole process was basically
0:09:51 and there's going to be this um the
0:09:53 destroying of the status quo in terms of
0:09:55 what the values are
0:09:56 in society and then the society would
0:09:59 have to go through this process of
0:10:00 reevaluation of values now in that
0:10:03 reevaluation
0:10:04 truth doesn't have to be valued if you
0:10:07 find it something restrictive
0:10:09 then you can continue to build a new
0:10:12 value system where truth doesn't play a
0:10:13 part in it
0:10:14 and that you don't have to maybe because
0:10:17 you do
0:10:18 you don't like the things that you know
0:10:20 come out of that but people don't for
0:10:22 example
0:10:22 this idea that um and we need to touch
0:10:25 on this as well that why if there's a
0:10:26 cosmic nihilism does that
0:10:28 necessarily entail existential nihilism
0:10:31 on like a personal level
0:10:33 and and the reason is is like if you
0:10:36 want to feel
0:10:37 meaning in a um in an authentic manner
0:10:40 it becomes impossible when you
0:10:42 understand that or
0:10:44 you've come to an understanding where
0:10:45 you see the world as nothing but
0:10:47 um being on the foundational level just
0:10:50 empty matter there's no conscious push
0:10:52 it's all random atoms hitting each other
0:10:55 it's all chaos it's all absurd
0:10:57 if you've got this notion off the absurd
0:10:59 at the foundation of
0:11:00 everything any meaning that you build on
0:11:02 top of that
0:11:03 becomes necessarily an act like child's
0:11:07 play
0:11:08 like the children on the playground when
0:11:10 they're playing make-believe you can't
0:11:12 there's that's always at the back of
0:11:13 your head and if it's
0:11:15 at the back of your head unless you you
0:11:17 build a wall between you and it
0:11:19 then yeah you can you can you can't play
0:11:22 with meaning in an authentic manner
0:11:33 you