Andrew Tate vs Piers Morgan Reaction (2022-10-11) ​

0:00:02 how are you guys doing
0:00:05 I'm quickly going to do a review and
0:00:07 this is not really a planned review I
0:00:09 just watched this um
0:00:10 it was for me quite interesting and it
0:00:12 was a kind of call it cross-examination
0:00:16 from Piers Morgan and Andrew Tate and in
0:00:20 this uh
0:00:21 cross-examination I would say that Piers
0:00:24 Morgan really made a fool of himself
0:00:26 incessant Interruption uh embarrassing
0:00:30 insecurities on display I mean I
0:00:34 couldn't even hear the answers that
0:00:37 Andrew Tate was giving because Piers
0:00:40 Morgan was just so persistent
0:00:45 um persistent in his uh Interruption I I
0:00:49 have no idea how someone that is
0:00:51 involved in journalism for so long
0:00:54 can have such an amateurish approach
0:00:58 to
0:00:59 um cross-examination
0:01:01 but um there were some benefits that
0:01:04 came from it and the purpose of this
0:01:06 particular video is to go through some
0:01:09 of the discussions that took place
0:01:12 um which I found interesting not least
0:01:14 because actually some mention of Muslim
0:01:16 men and Islam and the Quran itself was
0:01:20 made in the video
0:01:23 I would say that the video was pretty
0:01:26 much
0:01:27 um cut down into three different
0:01:29 segments the first segment
0:01:31 they were talking about Authority
0:01:34 and Piers Morgan's position is that if
0:01:38 one says
0:01:39 that a man has or should have maybe some
0:01:44 level of authority over a woman
0:01:47 in a husband-wife relationship that this
0:01:50 is tantamount in his eyes to misogyny
0:01:54 to which I think uh Tay argued
0:01:58 impressively
0:02:00 though not impressively enough in my
0:02:03 opinion that actually there are
0:02:06 circumstances where in which a man is
0:02:08 expected to put forward Services of
0:02:10 protection
0:02:12 and if that is the case
0:02:14 and a man if he were to protect the
0:02:17 woman could put himself or his life in
0:02:20 danger then why he why shouldn't he be
0:02:24 uh if you like in charge of the decision
0:02:27 making uh regarding that particular
0:02:30 woman in these contexts and potentially
0:02:32 other contexts as well
0:02:35 um Piers Morgan seemed not to be able to
0:02:37 differentiate between two different
0:02:39 types of authority
0:02:40 uh what is referred to as moral
0:02:42 Authority and what is also referred to
0:02:45 as legal Authority
0:02:46 he keep he kept attempting to
0:02:50 conflate the two categories and in logic
0:02:53 this is all informal logic this is
0:02:55 referred to as a category mistake
0:02:57 fallacy this actually referred to as a
0:02:59 category mistake fallacy so both of them
0:03:02 were using the same words
0:03:04 but both of them were using it in
0:03:06 completely different ways
0:03:08 and when Tate was explaining to him what
0:03:11 he meant by the word Authority which is
0:03:13 a moral Authority
0:03:15 Piers Morgan didn't seem to actually
0:03:17 comprehend this point which is totally
0:03:20 embarrassing for someone of his age and
0:03:22 someone who's been in the industry as
0:03:24 long as him someone who we would assume
0:03:26 to be an educated man
0:03:28 secondly I think there's more to be said
0:03:31 in fact there can be consequences legal
0:03:35 consequences when I say legal here we're
0:03:37 speaking in the British context but we
0:03:39 might as well be speaking in any Western
0:03:41 context
0:03:42 that can be imposed on let's say a wife
0:03:46 if
0:03:48 obedience is inhibited or obscured
0:03:54 for example
0:03:55 if a woman is not fulfilling her sexual
0:04:00 rights in the I'm giving you an Islamic
0:04:02 paradigm from the Islamic Paradigm if
0:04:04 the woman doesn't fulfill her sexual
0:04:05 rights and she leaves a man
0:04:08 she withholds from the man sexually
0:04:11 the man is within his right not to
0:04:15 provide for that woman
0:04:16 and this is actually mentioned the books
0:04:18 of jurisprudence so in other words if
0:04:20 she is receiving a monthly stipend or if
0:04:24 she is getting money
0:04:26 from the man
0:04:28 that he doesn't need to provide that for
0:04:30 her anymore because
0:04:32 she has decided to withhold so he can
0:04:35 also decide to withhold
0:04:37 now this is legal because there's
0:04:40 nothing in the law that says that a man
0:04:43 has to give a woman money
0:04:45 there's nothing in the law at all this
0:04:47 doesn't include of course the children
0:04:48 the children are separate
0:04:51 uh unit of analysis
0:04:54 but what I am saying is that there are
0:04:55 consequences
0:04:56 so even from a legal Paradigm Authority
0:05:00 can be manifest from a man to a woman
0:05:05 um in ways which are monetary now one
0:05:08 can argue what about the woman is
0:05:09 working already
0:05:10 well in the Islamic Paradigm even if the
0:05:12 woman is working the man should be
0:05:14 spending for the woman in the household
0:05:17 and so she would still be losing her
0:05:20 monetarily for them so Authority can be
0:05:23 manifest
0:05:25 the example that Tate gave about you
0:05:28 know locking her in the room and so on
0:05:30 this is something which we don't believe
0:05:32 in anyway as Muslims
0:05:35 so that's the first thing I will say the
0:05:37 second conversation they had and I think
0:05:39 here
0:05:40 Tate should be a little bit more
0:05:41 introspective and self-reflective
0:05:44 is where he referred to women as
0:05:46 property
0:05:47 and then he actually invoked the Quran
0:05:49 and the Bible
0:05:51 and said that this is mentioned the
0:05:52 Quran you can go back to the Quran and
0:05:54 paraphrasing or go back to the Bible or
0:05:56 something like this
0:05:57 well is this is actually a
0:05:59 misrepresentation
0:06:00 especially of the Quran there is nothing
0:06:02 like that in the Quran at all
0:06:05 and giving the example of a woman taking
0:06:07 us the second name of the man
0:06:10 that's not actually an Islamic principle
0:06:13 for example and since Islam came into
0:06:15 the picture it's important that this
0:06:17 clarification is made a woman keeps her
0:06:19 own name on the Islamic Paradigm why
0:06:22 because Islam came to protect five
0:06:23 things and five things and lineage is
0:06:25 one of them and that is for men and for
0:06:27 women
0:06:28 so I thought I thought that that
0:06:30 particular segment uh wasn't well
0:06:33 presented and I think he should take
0:06:34 responsibility for that
0:06:37 and considering the facts and I think
0:06:39 Morgan should have mentioned this that
0:06:42 his his business interests takes
0:06:44 business interests has been providing
0:06:48 um you know I don't know what it is
0:06:49 website Services sexual Services
0:06:51 webcam sexual services and stuff like
0:06:54 that
0:06:55 uh the the idea of mentioning women as
0:06:58 property I think is person to be honest
0:07:00 with you I think it is objectifying and
0:07:03 it is problematic and I think his
0:07:05 invocation of religion is problematic as
0:07:07 well he has no right to mention the
0:07:09 Quran he has no right to mention the
0:07:11 Bible in these things
0:07:14 uh thirdly I think um so that that's
0:07:17 really the two main segments then there
0:07:18 was a discussion about depression
0:07:20 uh I think that appears in a very poor
0:07:22 job there as well
0:07:24 um he could have once again he could
0:07:26 have done it you know asked some more
0:07:28 pressing questions
0:07:29 but what I will say is that to be honest
0:07:33 this Aura of invincibility that Andrew
0:07:35 Tate wants to
0:07:37 to manifest in the public sphere now
0:07:39 that is the the mask the faux mask of
0:07:42 invincibility uh is is clearly starting
0:07:45 to drop and to be honest with you I
0:07:47 don't even know why Tate went and spoke
0:07:49 to Piers Morgan in the first place his
0:07:50 agenda is very clear his tactics are
0:07:53 very well known
0:07:54 um he actually is known to distort
0:07:56 information before he puts it on public
0:07:59 he never he never wants a structure
0:08:02 which is a balanced in other words where
0:08:04 he himself is being interrogated as well
0:08:07 as being the interrogator he he has
0:08:09 never engaged in a public debate
0:08:12 he would prefer this to be the
0:08:14 interrogator and so this individual
0:08:17 um going on to his program I think was a
0:08:19 mistake especially considering the fact
0:08:22 that you know usually take where's his
0:08:23 sunglasses and the fact that you know
0:08:26 the the light was bouncing off his eyes
0:08:28 it seemed like it was a little bit
0:08:29 teary-eyed it seemed like it was a
0:08:31 little bit disheveled at times there was
0:08:33 no need for it at all
0:08:35 ah
0:08:37 in Islam there is a saying which is
0:08:44 the prophetic saying is that the upper
0:08:46 hand is better than the lower hand in
0:08:48 other words don't put yourself in a
0:08:50 position where you know
0:08:52 that the odds are against you you're
0:08:55 putting yourself in a disadvantageous
0:08:57 position by letting a man who is known
0:09:00 for his
0:09:03 incessant interrogation not allowing you
0:09:06 to finish Distortion of material to
0:09:09 speak to you the way he did with no
0:09:11 respect at all
0:09:14 and I think it shows some weakness and
0:09:17 tight because there were questions that
0:09:19 he asked which I was shocked at the the
0:09:22 response that Tate provided when he
0:09:24 asked for example are you a feminist
0:09:26 why couldn't you just offer him a
0:09:28 response and say no
0:09:30 we saw a new kind of
0:09:33 apologetic side of you which is
0:09:36 completely off-brand something which we
0:09:38 don't expect number one number two
0:09:42 you actually declared I think for the I
0:09:45 don't know I haven't been watching your
0:09:46 videos but you declare that you're a
0:09:47 libertarian
0:09:48 and your whole from what I understand
0:09:51 your whole thing
0:09:53 is about coming outside of the Matrix
0:09:55 now mentioning libertarian
0:09:57 that you're a Libertarian which you know
0:10:00 was
0:10:01 predicated on the liberal ethic liberal
0:10:05 you know political liberalism or
0:10:07 philosophical philosophical liberalism
0:10:10 to mention that you're a Libertarian
0:10:12 you're telling us that you're well
0:10:14 within the Matrix here
0:10:15 so what I will say to Tate is that
0:10:19 the way to really come out of the Matrix
0:10:22 as it were is not to be a Libertarian in
0:10:25 fact that's the dominant ethic that's
0:10:27 exactly what everyone wants us to be
0:10:30 but it's to be
0:10:32 the religion which I think you know is
0:10:35 true deep down
0:10:37 which is a Muslim to believe in one God
0:10:39 and to Worship in one God
0:10:41 to
0:10:42 to do God's work and what I mean by that
0:10:46 is to follow God's laws his legislation
0:10:49 and so on
0:10:51 uh and and to follow the Prophet
0:10:54 Muhammad
0:10:57 because you know what it is and I'll say
0:10:59 this and it'll be the last thing I say
0:11:01 it's really interesting
0:11:04 that the prophet Muhammad he went
0:11:06 through what he went through in life
0:11:07 people don't know that all of his
0:11:09 children
0:11:10 save one child which is Fatima died in
0:11:12 his own time
0:11:14 he was the person his wife died he went
0:11:16 through heartbreak after heartbreak and
0:11:18 uh you know his uncles died his closest
0:11:21 the closest people to him died
0:11:23 uh he went through Wars over 20 Wars he
0:11:27 participated in himself he had nine
0:11:30 wives at one time he was running a state
0:11:32 doing wars managing nine wives at one
0:11:35 time all of these things are incredible
0:11:37 things about a prophet Muhammad the
0:11:40 final prophet and it's itself I would
0:11:42 say is an evidence for his prophethood
0:11:44 following a man like that okay
0:11:47 who in the most difficult times is able
0:11:50 to persevere is able to to direct people
0:11:54 to be a the best leader you know who
0:11:57 we're mentioning a thousand four hundred
0:11:59 years after his death which will is way
0:12:01 more than we're going to say about any
0:12:03 of us okay
0:12:05 that's
0:12:07 that is true
0:12:08 uh religion okay that is the true
0:12:11 religion and that is a true
0:12:13 you will really succeed from from doing
0:12:15 these things
0:12:16 so that's all I have to say about that
0:12:18 and um hopefully we'll see each other
0:12:22 soon and assalamu alaikum