Ayaan 'Hirsi Ali' Ridiculous Research Exposed (2022-03-04) ​

0:00:00 do you think that there's a link between
0:00:03 muslim immigration in europe and an
0:00:05 increase in sexual violence towards
0:00:07 european women
0:00:09 um
0:00:10 the answer to that is
0:00:12 yes and there are some caveats i've my
0:00:15 latest book is called pray
0:00:18 and the subtitle is islam immigration
0:00:20 and the erosion of the rights of women
0:00:24 the answer
0:00:26 my uneasy answer to this is yes the
0:00:28 caveat is not all muslim men
0:00:32 are misogynists and not all muslim men
0:00:35 harass or attack women or treat them
0:00:37 badly
0:00:39 but
0:00:40 there is a minority
0:00:42 and that minority is considerable
0:00:45 and that minority of
0:00:48 very young muslim men
0:00:50 have come from societies
0:00:53 where women are viewed differently from
0:00:55 the way they are viewed in europe and
0:00:57 once they come to europe they start to
0:00:59 behave in ways
0:01:01 that are hostile to women
0:01:03 sexual harassment graves gang rapes
0:01:07 even syndicates or grooming gangs that
0:01:10 prey on young girls
0:01:12 now what has islam goes to with any of
0:01:15 this
0:01:17 when you talk to
0:01:18 religious leaders muslim religious
0:01:20 leaders
0:01:21 what they say is
0:01:23 well the behavior of these men is wrong
0:01:26 but the fact that women are around in
0:01:29 public
0:01:30 uncovered
0:01:31 and by themselves is also wrong so then
0:01:34 they propose solutions that are
0:01:37 sharia-based in europe
0:01:39 that's one
0:01:40 number two
0:01:42 women are divided into those who good
0:01:44 and modest
0:01:46 and those who are bad
0:01:48 and bad women
0:01:49 whether it is
0:01:51 within
0:01:52 islam or within the tribal culture that
0:01:56 some of these young men come from
0:01:58 women who are regarded as bad are
0:02:00 regarded as unprotected
0:02:03 unprotected meaning unprotected by male
0:02:05 guardians
0:02:06 so in that sense what you see is
0:02:09 yeah and i have talked to some of these
0:02:11 young men
0:02:12 muslim men in europe and asked them why
0:02:15 is it that you can't if you behave this
0:02:18 way in egypt when you come to
0:02:21 germany why do you carry on behaving
0:02:23 this way
0:02:24 and
0:02:25 a lot of them who've actually
0:02:27 done some reflection on the differences
0:02:30 in societies just say
0:02:31 that they explain the differences and
0:02:33 they say
0:02:35 if i behaved this way in egypt or in
0:02:38 afghanistan or iraq i would meet with no
0:02:41 disapproval
0:02:42 the women who are targeted they are the
0:02:44 ones who are disapproved of because they
0:02:46 are the ones who put themselves in
0:02:48 trouble
0:02:49 and so
0:02:50 as you can see there's this big
0:02:52 clash of values or clash of civilization
0:02:55 i don't know what you want to call it
0:02:57 but on the treatment of women that
0:03:00 definitely is a clash of values when it
0:03:02 comes to the values of europe versus the
0:03:04 values of islam so on
0:03:07 the the the thesis and i'm not sure if
0:03:09 you want to ask this is a separate
0:03:10 question but the thesis that mcgann has
0:03:13 put forward
0:03:14 in her newest book pray is that actually
0:03:17 what you find is that muslim men the
0:03:20 immigration of muslim men to european
0:03:22 countries has increased rape this is
0:03:24 basically it and she mentions in page 33
0:03:27 of that book she says there's an actual
0:03:29 causal relationship
0:03:30 she says that there's a causal
0:03:32 relationship i've read her book the
0:03:33 entire book
0:03:35 and i've seen the data that she puts
0:03:36 forward for the claims that she makes
0:03:39 michaela and she and just go for the
0:03:42 idea
0:03:42 the idea is that muslim men immigration
0:03:46 coming into
0:03:47 european countries causes an increase in
0:03:49 rape that's what he's saying
0:03:52 now look
0:03:53 she mentions what is the data that she
0:03:55 mentioned she mentions data from about
0:03:57 five european countries including but
0:03:59 not limited to the united kingdom france
0:04:02 and sweden
0:04:04 now what she then states
0:04:06 is that there's evidence for a causal
0:04:08 relationship in page 33.
0:04:11 what is this data missing michaela this
0:04:13 data is missing
0:04:15 i mean this data has everything going
0:04:16 for it in fact except for the evidence
0:04:20 because this data does not even have
0:04:24 that these men are muslim men and that
0:04:26 might be a surprise and a shock to you
0:04:28 but this data is about where these men
0:04:30 come from so for instance she cites that
0:04:32 these men come from africa from uh
0:04:34 subcontinental asia but you will know
0:04:37 and i'm sure your viewers who are clever
0:04:39 people
0:04:40 who have been educated at a minor level
0:04:42 will know that africa is not it's not a
0:04:44 muslim continent the entire continent of
0:04:47 africa there are many muslims in it and
0:04:49 there are many christians in it so the
0:04:51 data is not conclusive in fact it
0:04:53 doesn't even show anything it just shows
0:04:55 that people coming from af there's an
0:04:56 increase of people coming from africa
0:04:58 and then there's an increase also in
0:05:00 rape okay well we tried the same
0:05:03 methodology michaela i actually tried
0:05:05 the same methodology with latin america
0:05:08 and america the united states of america
0:05:11 so people coming from latin america
0:05:12 which are not muslims as you know
0:05:14 when they go into america the united
0:05:16 states there is also a correlative
0:05:19 increase in rape now we can't say just
0:05:22 because there's a correlative increase
0:05:24 in rape and this is a fallacy by the way
0:05:27 that therefore the causation is those
0:05:29 people but even if we did say that
0:05:32 well latin americans are not muslim
0:05:35 latin americans are christians and
0:05:38 therefore the most part very small
0:05:40 muslim minor very very small and
0:05:41 negligible muslim minority and therefore
0:05:45 the whole thesis collapses
0:05:47 she even mentions and she lies through a
0:05:50 mission by mentioning data from the
0:05:53 world health organization and she is a
0:05:54 liar by the way she's a lie she lied to
0:05:57 the dutch parliament she lies by by a
0:05:59 mission by mentioning the who the only i
0:06:03 know the only data that has that the wh
0:06:06 has done on rape
0:06:08 and she she mentions certain things
0:06:10 about africa once again there's not even
0:06:12 a muslim continent in its entirety and
0:06:14 subcontinental asia but what she doesn't
0:06:17 mention is that according to the who
0:06:20 that same report that she mentions but
0:06:21 she omits this part
0:06:23 according to the who
0:06:26 that stranger rape is highest in what
0:06:29 they call the high income areas which is
0:06:31 the west so in other words stranger rape
0:06:34 is highest in
0:06:36 europe
0:06:37 or if you want to generalize europe and
0:06:40 america
0:06:41 and canada where you're from so wait a
0:06:43 minute what's going on here the whole
0:06:45 thesis starts to be destroyed and of
0:06:47 course as i've said to you before and
0:06:49 i'll say to you again islam prohibits
0:06:51 pre-marital
0:06:52 pre-marital
0:06:54 engagements between men and women how on
0:06:56 earth
0:06:57 can you get a thesis that says islam and
0:07:00 she mentions the word cause and it said
0:07:02 fallacy causes an increase in rape
0:07:05 for muslim men to non-muslim women where
0:07:08 islam limits it to the highest level
0:07:11 stranger rape funny enough according to
0:07:13 the who is lowest in areas which are
0:07:16 most populated by muslim people like the
0:07:18 subcontinental area
0:07:20 of course they say that's because the
0:07:22 cultural reasons of a woman coming out
0:07:23 and all that kind of thing that's their
0:07:24 analysis but that's not their data
0:07:27 furthermore
0:07:28 if it was to do with the jurisprudence
0:07:31 then we know that orthodox jews have a
0:07:34 very similar if not more strict way more
0:07:37 strict
0:07:39 kind of jurisprudential tradition when
0:07:41 it comes to the interaction of men and
0:07:42 women however
0:07:44 i will tell you michaela despite that
0:07:46 being the case we don't see
0:07:49 that that is causing any rape within
0:07:51 jewish communities or jewish men doing
0:07:53 that to non-jewish women
0:07:55 she mentions in her one of her
0:07:57 interviews that she does she says that
0:07:59 therefore muslim people need to be made
0:08:02 uh be taught how to be egalitarian we
0:08:04 believe in a complementarian system
0:08:06 where there's a managerial hierarchy and
0:08:07 the man's at the head of it we do
0:08:08 believe in that michael we're gonna lie
0:08:10 to you in the households that's we
0:08:11 really that's the only way we can do it
0:08:13 however
0:08:14 she's saying no she's trying to impose a
0:08:16 feminist narrative which you should be
0:08:17 opposed to and your father is already
0:08:18 opposed to which she says that she's
0:08:21 trying to uh that men that coming in
0:08:23 from abroad should now be kind of vetted
0:08:26 by told by being told what by being told
0:08:29 that they need to believe in the
0:08:30 egalitarian family system now if that's
0:08:32 the case that's not going to happen with
0:08:34 just muslims that should also happen
0:08:35 with christians with traditional
0:08:37 conservative values and it can happen
0:08:38 with jews as well and if that's the case
0:08:40 now she's ex this is a kind of corrosive
0:08:44 uh
0:08:45 restriction on on human freedom which is
0:08:48 unusual it's a creeping in of
0:08:49 collectivist discourse and it's very
0:08:51 unusual because in other places she
0:08:52 denies that she's a collectivist in
0:08:54 summary therefore i will say that the
0:08:56 thesis is most pathetic
0:08:58 and it's it's it is most
0:09:01 uh rejected it i it cannot be and it has
0:09:04 already been refuted by the way by many
0:09:05 many academics but for example jill
0:09:08 philippovich who's recently written a
0:09:11 comprehensive refutation of this
0:09:13 nonsense that this miserable specimen of
0:09:15 an academic charlatan has written
0:09:17 forward and some reason as being
0:09:20 is being taken seriously by people but
0:09:23 it cannot be taken seriously by people
0:09:25 this is basically let me show you
0:09:26 something and mikayla sensei on the
0:09:27 topic it's basically a rehashing
0:09:30 of
0:09:31 uh it's the rehashing of the jewish
0:09:33 discourses as you can see here the
0:09:36 fascistic juice the jewish problem you
0:09:38 see the white woman there and then the
0:09:39 jewish man can you see this kind of
0:09:40 thing can you see it i'm not sure if you
0:09:41 can see that this is the kind of thing
0:09:43 before uh i'm not sure if you can see
0:09:45 that or not
0:09:46 a little bit closer would probably be
0:09:48 better can you put that a bit closer
0:09:49 please
0:09:50 this is the kind of newspaper article
0:09:52 where the jewish problem the white woman
0:09:54 there's the prize and all the people the
0:09:56 jewish man there bring it back a bit
0:09:57 bring it back
0:09:59 bring it yeah yeah yeah can you see it
0:10:02 wait a
0:10:09 this is before what happened the pogroms
0:10:11 and whatever happened this is the
0:10:12 discourse she's just it's just rehashing
0:10:14 a fascistic discourse and
0:10:17 being academics and clever people we
0:10:20 should you know i'm sure people in the
0:10:22 new conservative movement or the
0:10:23 alt-right whoever is in america and in
0:10:26 the west will be able to see this what
0:10:27 it is it's nonsense it's academically
0:10:30 redundant and it is the most ridiculous
0:10:32 thesis i've ever seen in my life by
0:10:34 someone who has no peer-reviewed work
0:10:37 and should not be taken seriously by
0:10:38 anybody