Skip to content
On this page

فيلسوف إنجليزي يعتنق الإسلام بعد حواره مع مسلم (2019-02-14)

## Description

نقاش جيد بين رجل فيلسوف و مسلم حول التوحيد و إثبات نبوة محمد ص

Summary of فيلسوف إنجليزي يعتنق الإسلام بعد حواره مع مسلم

*This summary is AI generated - there may be inaccuracies.

00:00:00 - 00:20:00

discusses how a Muslim man came to the conclusion that the Quran is the word of God. He discusses the Islamic perspective on religion, and how the Quran makes predictions about the future that have come true. He argues that the Quran is not from human beings, and that Muslims are the least violent people in the world.

00:00:00 a Muslim man discusses the Islamic perspective on religion with a non-Muslim. He says that the starting point for Muslims is a strict monotheism, and that the most appropriate relationship a believer can have with God is harmony. He goes on to say that because humans are creations of God, they should never listen to a boss or something that does not agree with their own sense of morality, and that the aim of life should be to be submissive to God.

  • 00:05:00 The Islamic narrative is that prophets were sent to preach submission to specific peoples at specific times, with a visual and auditory evidence base. Moses' miracle, breaking the rules of physical reality, was an evidence of his message. Muhammad is the final prophet, and all the other prophets were sent to their people in their times. Jesus, Moses, and other prophets came with a message and an evidence base, but Jesus' message is the most important.
  • *00:10:00 Discusses how the Islamic message, which includes evidence that points to the existence of a higher power, can convince people of its legitimacy. Various predictions from the Quran about the future are discussed, along with how the lack of accuracy of these predictions makes it difficult to believe that the Quran was written by a human. The article goes on to say that the probability of all of these events happening by chance is very low, and that when these events are put together, it becomes difficult to argue that the Quran is not from God.
  • 00:15:00 argues that despite being the least violent people in the world, Muslims have had controversies on everything else but have never had a controversy on what constitutes the Quran. They also argue that Christians have disagreed on how many books are in the Bible, and that atheists have been the most violent people in history.
  • 00:20:00 The Muslim YouTube user discusses his reasons for converting to Islam and his belief that the Quran is the word of God. He also provides his phone number for anyone who wants to discuss religious matters further.

Full transcript with timestamps: CLICK TO EXPAND

0:00:00 look you said that you're looking at all
0:00:02 the different religions yeah once again
0:00:04 you said you don't accept idolatry and
0:00:06 stuff I accept accept I believe in that
0:00:08 as well I agree with you look the first
0:00:10 thing I want to say to you is from a
0:00:12 Muslim perspective from an Islamic
0:00:13 perspective yeah is that we would say
0:00:15 the starting point for us is a very
0:00:19 strict monotheism yeah so for us and the
0:00:23 sign point is like a monotheism well we
0:00:25 believe that there is an ultimate
0:00:27 creator sustainer an ultimate power
0:00:30 that initiated the universe if that
0:00:33 makes sense now how feasible does that
0:00:35 sound oh my Russia was at the sound of
0:00:37 your mind yeah I believe that the
0:00:40 Creator is what brings life to the
0:00:43 material realm Arturo is this an
0:00:45 illusion
0:00:46 yeah we can't take any of this stuff
0:00:47 with us when we go so the idea of an
0:00:50 immortal God from which we all
0:00:51 originated gives us purpose so you agree
0:00:54 with that idea you accept it I mean do
0:00:56 you believe in it their creator yeah
0:00:58 mate it its life to existence yeah it's
0:01:17 different in a create and creationism
0:01:19 creationism you're saying you reject
0:01:24 kind of like the biblical narrative by
0:01:26 at the same time you don't reject the
0:01:27 idea of an all-knowing all-powerful
0:01:29 creator force that side of the universe
0:01:31 yeah okay it's all right so what I was
0:01:33 going to say now since that's the case
0:01:34 now we have to define some of the
0:01:36 attributes of this creator yeah would
0:01:38 you accept that some of the attributes
0:01:40 are creative capacity or power or
0:01:43 knowledge would you say that these are
0:01:45 fundamental to - such as creativity
0:01:54 yes it is yeah you're saying is creative
0:02:04 the creative essence of the universe and
0:02:07 of individual souls yeah yes god I
0:02:09 completely agree how can we out your
0:02:12 intuition for example it is a
0:02:14 fundamental metaphysical function of our
0:02:16 of our personality our soul how come you
0:02:19 know how can we we can't prove we can't
0:02:21 program a machine for example to do
0:02:23 these things so how can we ever prove
0:02:25 that this is I exist outside yeah it's
0:02:28 good all right so having said that I
0:02:30 want ask your question what's the most
0:02:32 appropriate relationship you can have
0:02:35 with such an entity the most appropriate
0:02:38 relationship is one harmony essentially
0:02:44 when you live in harmony with mankind
0:02:46 and with the planet you are living in
0:02:47 harmony with God there is no separation
0:02:50 between the effects that you enact upon
0:02:53 the world and what comes to you what
0:02:55 more moral consequences okay I accept
0:02:58 that to a certain extent let me show you
0:03:00 something we have our own version of
0:03:01 that right so we say because if you look
0:03:04 at these in traditions they do reference
0:03:06 how to be one with God and these kinds
0:03:08 of things from our perspective we say
0:03:10 there is a way to basically be
0:03:13 harmonious with the will of the creator
0:03:15 and the way that works is basically the
0:03:18 Creator has made things created the
0:03:20 creation and in the creation you have
0:03:23 anima an inanimate right
0:03:25 as for the inanimate objects around us
0:03:27 they are forcibly or obliged to kind of
0:03:32 submit to the will of the of the Creator
0:03:35 right so basically in other words in
0:03:38 order to be one with creation in that
0:03:40 sense not in the sense of actual
0:03:42 physicality but we're talking in that
0:03:44 figurative sense the way to do that
0:03:47 would be to do where everything else
0:03:48 around you is doing so everything around
0:03:51 us if you accept the premise of them an
0:03:53 all-powerful creator is submissive to
0:03:56 that creator we will say by extension it
0:03:58 makes sense to also be submissive to the
0:04:01 Creator in the same way that everything
0:04:04 being submissive see does that make
0:04:05 sense I completely agree yeah submissive
0:04:08 to you but we know will of the creator
0:04:09 exactly the will of the creator
0:04:11 but never to an authoritarian figure
0:04:13 that's why I'm so against idolatry
0:04:14 because anyone these false prophets or
0:04:17 these dogmatic beliefs these are these
0:04:20 are not following these are not
0:04:21 creations of gods but their creations of
0:04:22 human beings and so never listen to a
0:04:26 boss or something that doesn't agree
0:04:28 with your own sense of morality that
0:04:30 comes from within but live in harmony
0:04:32 with with that that intuition which
0:04:35 comes essentially from God all right so
0:04:37 let me ask you a question because the
0:04:38 thing is it becomes very subjective when
0:04:40 it becomes clouded and that kind of
0:04:42 terminology I'll be honest with you
0:04:43 because what we will say is that if our
0:04:47 essentially our aim in life is to be
0:04:49 submissive to God right in the sense of
0:04:53 the aforementioned if that's the the aim
0:04:56 of life for the purpose of life surely
0:04:58 there should be a uniform way a
0:05:01 universal way that God has allowed human
0:05:04 beings to be able to do that a uniform I
0:05:07 agree yeah so now there we would say
0:05:10 this is the Islamic narrative I've been
0:05:11 completely straightforward with you yeah
0:05:13 the Islamic narrative is that the way
0:05:15 that happens is that the creator
0:05:17 communicates with the creation and he
0:05:20 does so through prophets who have come a
0:05:22 full time yeah so prophets are a
0:05:24 necessary extension of what is necessary
0:05:27 to happen on appropriate between the
0:05:31 creator and the creation or in this case
0:05:33 human being specifically who are
0:05:34 sentient beings and able to make their
0:05:38 own decisions on free world creatures so
0:05:42 there was a need for prophets there was
0:05:44 a need for the communication between the
0:05:47 creator and the creation and so prophets
0:05:51 came up for time the Islamic narrative
0:05:52 is that so long as humans were on earth
0:05:54 there were prophets preaching the
0:05:56 message of what we'd call submission
0:05:58 yeah so people like Adam you might have
0:06:01 heard of these kind of biblical names
0:06:03 Adam and Noah and Moses and Jesus all of
0:06:06 those are prophets that came to their
0:06:09 respective peoples and their respective
0:06:10 times and preached the message of
0:06:13 submission to their peoples
0:06:15 does that make sense right so what we
0:06:18 would say is that the the messengers
0:06:20 came fundamentally with two different
0:06:21 things they came with a message and they
0:06:23 came with a an evidence base to
0:06:25 substantiate that message so in the in
0:06:29 the case of Moses you might have heard
0:06:30 of these stories or basically you know
0:06:32 the C splitting and all these kind of
0:06:34 different things yeah it's in the Old
0:06:36 Testament it's also on the forum these
0:06:38 stories are meant to indicate that these
0:06:40 these are evidences yeah that are used
0:06:43 to prove the message of submission
0:06:46 because there's something which break
0:06:48 the natural capacity of physical reality
0:06:49 around us so there are evidence that
0:06:51 basically God is the author of of the
0:06:54 message that these prophets come with
0:06:57 now whereas all of the prophets and
0:06:59 messengers were sent to their respective
0:07:01 owners
0:07:01 yes this is this see spitting why is
0:07:04 that
0:07:04 I mean why why does that give evidence
0:07:07 that this is otherwise what's that got
0:07:09 to do with Mohammed first off disease
0:07:10 right so not the C splitting doesn't
0:07:13 have anything to do specifically with
0:07:14 Muhammad's message but it's I mean
0:07:16 although it is no Quran we're talking
0:07:18 specifically about Moses so in his time
0:07:20 and this is an interesting thing that
0:07:22 the rush to be alluded to by some of our
0:07:24 scholars in Islam that depending on the
0:07:27 societal kind of what society popular at
0:07:31 the time the evidence base that the
0:07:34 messengers come with suits that so at
0:07:37 the time of kind of what is it the
0:07:39 younger what you call it the middle
0:07:41 Empire whether whoever is in Egypt when
0:07:43 ramesses ii was there and they say that
0:07:47 Ramesses is linked to Pharaoh or no
0:07:49 let's mention the back at this time they
0:07:52 were fascinated with magic magic and all
0:07:54 those kind of things now Moses came with
0:07:59 a you could call it a miracle really
0:08:01 which basically broke the rules of
0:08:04 physical nature yeah and which which
0:08:07 acted as an evidence for the for his
0:08:08 people so when people saw it they said
0:08:10 okay well this makes sense you I'm
0:08:12 saying alright so for us now you will
0:08:15 say was our miracle right because we
0:08:17 need some evidence as well to be able to
0:08:19 substantiate the claim that prophet
0:08:22 Muhammad is the final messenger because
0:08:24 that's our claim
0:08:25 our claim is that prophet muhammad
0:08:27 whereas all of the other prophets were
0:08:29 sent to their people in their times
0:08:30 jesus moses etc Abram Muhammad was sent
0:08:33 for all peoples in all times so that's
0:08:35 the Islamic narrative so here's what
0:08:37 he's come with as he's come with an
0:08:40 auditory miracle or auditory evidence
0:08:46 base whereas all the prophets came
0:08:47 before usually with a visual evidence
0:08:50 base so like for example in the case of
0:08:51 Moses the sea splitting was something
0:08:53 for human beings to visualize and see
0:08:55 whereas what we say is the evidence base
0:08:58 for the Islamic message is actually the
0:09:01 Quran itself which is something actually
0:09:04 which was transmitted orally although it
0:09:06 does have of course written books as
0:09:08 well to cooperate and triangulate the
0:09:10 veracity of the oral message so here
0:09:14 the Quran has many different things
0:09:17 within it which basically would lead
0:09:19 someone to believe that it couldn't have
0:09:21 been because you were saying use a kind
0:09:22 of like rationalistic approach we're
0:09:25 using a probe ballistic kind of rush
0:09:26 nursing approach you would I would argue
0:09:29 that the Quranic discourse contains
0:09:31 within it an evidence base I'm actually
0:09:34 not a rationalist I'm an imperious okay
0:09:36 so yeah Russian isn't it oh yeah I think
0:09:39 I got me something yeah yeah we can't
0:09:41 just rush it
0:09:42 we need to experience - fair enough I
0:09:44 think you're right about that as well
0:09:46 and that's why by the way the
0:09:47 fundamental thing in Islam is as follows
0:09:49 one of the one of the fundamental
0:09:51 messages Islam comes with is as follows
0:09:53 well as Christianity says we're born
0:09:55 with original sin yeah
0:09:56 aslam says no we're born with something
0:09:58 called the filter the filter ax is a
0:10:00 predisposition to to basically submit to
0:10:03 God not only to know who he is that the
0:10:05 higher power but to submit to him
0:10:07 automatically so this presupposition is
0:10:10 awakened by the various messages or the
0:10:14 various evidences that human being is
0:10:17 there thereafter exposed to so human
0:10:19 being is for example exposed to the the
0:10:21 fine-tuning of the universe and you
0:10:23 don't have to be a physicist to read to
0:10:25 appreciate the fine-tuning of the
0:10:26 universe
0:10:26 you can literally look with your naked
0:10:28 eye and the fact that the universe is in
0:10:30 fact finely tuned right and these kind
0:10:34 of things
0:10:35 aim to reawaken you
0:10:36 beings from the sale of slumber into and
0:10:40 the recollection of God so that's the
0:10:44 main thing of the Islamic message as
0:10:46 with the Quranic discourse as we've said
0:10:48 before has within it evidences we would
0:10:51 say which are very powerful in
0:10:53 convincing people that this is a
0:10:56 basically something which had to be
0:10:58 extra human in other words it couldn't
0:11:01 have been put together by a human
0:11:05 ability so we were saying for example
0:11:08 the fact that the Quran precisely
0:11:12 discusses events that happens in the
0:11:14 future and I'll give you one example of
0:11:15 that there at a time of the Prophet
0:11:18 there were the Romans and a Persians and
0:11:20 the Quran makes very specific
0:11:22 predictions about who will win wars and
0:11:24 the case of chapter 30 verse 1 to 6 it
0:11:27 talks about the Romans decisively going
0:11:30 to beat the the Persians in three to
0:11:32 nine years in a nearby land now these
0:11:34 are this is one of many different
0:11:35 predictions of the future the Quran
0:11:37 makes and that the Sun now which is the
0:11:39 secondary book of the corpus that
0:11:42 Muslims believe in or the hadith the
0:11:44 strong hadith make of the future from a
0:11:48 probabilistic perspective we can say ok
0:11:50 well probably if someone says one thing
0:11:53 or two things they might have guessed
0:11:54 him to be correct but if we put them all
0:11:56 together it becomes very very difficult
0:11:59 to make the argument that he guessed all
0:12:00 of those correct especially when we
0:12:02 consider by the way did you know let me
0:12:04 tell you something in Jehovah's Witness
0:12:07 in the in the in the church of the
0:12:09 jehovah's witness you know they
0:12:10 predicted and by the way they believed
0:12:12 in this kind of thing where people will
0:12:13 bring you know divinely inspired they
0:12:16 predicted that the day of judgment will
0:12:17 be on 90 in the year 1977 you know that
0:12:21 and when that year did not when the day
0:12:23 of judgment didn't happen in that year
0:12:24 they cool there the great disappointment
0:12:27 because i mean i don't know why anyone
0:12:29 would be disappointed for the live
0:12:30 judgment not happening but they called
0:12:32 it the great disappointment the reason
0:12:33 why is because the prediction didn't
0:12:35 materialize and that has repercussions
0:12:37 around vacations for the message because
0:12:40 it couldn't bring divine if it didn't
0:12:42 materialize because it was meant to me
0:12:43 from all-knowing sauce
0:12:46 the saying the Quran predicted the
0:12:48 Romans were gonna defeat the Persians
0:12:54 the Roman Empire fell out for are you
0:12:57 talking about the Holy Roman to the
0:12:58 first of all the two Roman empires right
0:13:00 so the Roman Empire started in the year
0:13:02 31 BC yeah
0:13:04 the gal the Gallic Wars and stuff like
0:13:06 that whatever and it continued on
0:13:08 but then the Holy Roman Empire side okay
0:13:11 now the Byzantine Empire which was what
0:13:14 was around at the time of the Prophet
0:13:15 Mohammed and continued on to Matilda at
0:13:17 1400s this is what we refer to yeah okay
0:13:20 but the Roman Empire as you would have
0:13:23 known from the history lesson that you
0:13:24 know them were in constant wars with the
0:13:27 sassanids empires or they also called
0:13:29 the Sicilians emphasis Aeneas not others
0:13:31 yeah basically they put the persians and
0:13:33 then and this was referred to in the
0:13:35 western history books as the roman
0:13:36 sassanid wars now the point is the roman
0:13:39 empire as you would have known from from
0:13:41 the year 400 onwards and the profit came
0:13:44 around six hundred thirty you know
0:13:47 around that time so from the seventh
0:13:48 century but from that year from that
0:13:50 time period it was going down there was
0:13:52 a degeneration of the Roman Empire
0:13:53 anyways and so the Sassanid Empire was
0:13:55 much stronger so wonderful I made the
0:13:57 claim that the Roman Empire was going to
0:13:59 beat the Sassanid Empire in three to
0:14:01 nine years and in a pile and all these
0:14:03 different things it wasn't it was a kind
0:14:05 of ridiculous claim if you think about
0:14:06 from a probability perspective it's the
0:14:08 equivalent of betting on a very low team
0:14:11 maybe in the Champions League being a
0:14:13 very high team may be in the top five in
0:14:15 the in the Premier League right
0:14:17 I'm betting that they will beat them in
0:14:19 a certain way in a certain place in a
0:14:20 certain time period all these different
0:14:22 things so probabilistically the odds are
0:14:24 very low for that and that's one example
0:14:25 but there are many different examples
0:14:26 for example the conquest of Arabia by
0:14:29 the Muslims the fact that other nations
0:14:31 who fall into the hands of the Muslims
0:14:33 like Egypt and Yemen in Syria and Jordan
0:14:34 you know and Pakistan and India it's in
0:14:37 dual hand they're all these different
0:14:38 places which are now part of the rope
0:14:40 the the Islamic empire have been
0:14:43 predicted to be conquered by the by
0:14:46 Muslim hands by basically so all of this
0:14:48 is when we put this into a probability
0:14:50 generator it becomes very difficult to
0:14:53 argue that cook this all could have been
0:14:54 guests and I would actually argue I make
0:14:56 a very daring claim here
0:14:57 this is this kind of frequency and
0:15:00 accuracy of predictions has never been
0:15:03 able has never been predicted by anyone
0:15:05 I don't know if any human being if you
0:15:07 want to bring Nostradamus or the the job
0:15:10 is when there's anyone that you wanna
0:15:11 that have made predictions of the future
0:15:12 with this many with this much frequency
0:15:15 and detail which have actually
0:15:17 materialized in the way that they've
0:15:18 been to realized do you see what I'm
0:15:22 saying
0:15:22 so here when we say we have evidence for
0:15:24 the veracity and the truthfulness of
0:15:26 Islam we're not just saying that we have
0:15:29 kind of superfluous evidence or kind of
0:15:32 arbitrary subjective type evidences our
0:15:34 evidences are probably our actually can
0:15:38 be analyzed objectively you see what I'm
0:15:41 saying
0:15:42 this is not regarding the fact that the
0:15:45 Quran is also in and of itself a book
0:15:48 that claims that has no contradictions a
0:15:50 book that challenges mankind to produce
0:15:52 a chapter like him a book of the we
0:15:56 would actually I make the argument then
0:15:57 the only religious ancient religious
0:15:59 book ancient religious book which has
0:16:01 been preserved in terms of its its
0:16:05 material its corpus
0:16:06 we've never the Muslims have never had a
0:16:08 controversy and this can go on the
0:16:10 record and believe me I'm here every
0:16:12 week and people try and they'll try and
0:16:13 maybe but I can say this completely
0:16:16 clearly the Muslims have never had a
0:16:18 controversy on what constitutes the
0:16:21 Quran never it's never happened they've
0:16:23 had controversies on everything else but
0:16:24 they've never had a controversy on what
0:16:26 constitutes the Quran the Christians
0:16:28 around the other hand they are differing
0:16:31 on how many how many books on in the
0:16:34 biblical canon the the process say
0:16:36 seventy two books the Catholics say
0:16:38 sorry the Protestants am 66 the
0:16:40 Catholics say 72 the Eastern Orthodox 81
0:16:43 so here your names now how many books
0:16:44 are in the in the Bible let alone the
0:16:46 manuscripts in these things so here what
0:16:48 we're saying is not only deny our
0:16:49 evidences there are analyzable just a
0:16:54 word but also we have that which is
0:16:57 necessary for a book to be a Word of God
0:16:59 a preserved book free from contradiction
0:17:02 and unlimite book so with that you see
0:17:06 the power of the
0:17:08 the the argument yeah no I believe that
0:17:12 it's been like you know you when you buy
0:17:14 a software for the first time and you
0:17:16 install updates yes like Christianity
0:17:19 came along that was one update and we've
0:17:21 had Islam yeah I said that's a good way
0:17:24 the thing is that we the only problem
0:17:29 was yeah yeah in any religion is
0:17:31 violence as you know yes
0:17:33 we've always seen this violence in all
0:17:36 religions I'm not here to blame
0:17:38 yes yeah I think that the only problem
0:17:41 is that the thing that people blame
0:17:44 Islam for there is why they so violent
0:17:47 yeah there is and then they have to kind
0:17:50 of look at themselves were the Western
0:17:52 intervention we also have to say exactly
0:17:54 that area of the world has been a kind
0:17:58 of hodgepodge of different civilizations
0:18:01 like that boy Rome to the west yet the
0:18:03 Mongols Arabs were all competing and and
0:18:07 of course that violence is very harmful
0:18:09 to a person and it causes arguments okay
0:18:16 I accept what you're saying you're right
0:18:17 violence is never a good thing but
0:18:18 that's a in defense of Islam yeah when
0:18:23 people accuse Islamic world to face my
0:18:25 violence yeah look at the cultural
0:18:26 context here yeah exactly I mean if we
0:18:29 look at the raw data you'll find that in
0:18:32 terms of population I would actually
0:18:35 make the argument that it's like Muslim
0:18:37 people as a proportion of the population
0:18:39 are probably the least violent I know
0:18:41 that sounds ridiculous in the last 100
0:18:43 years they have proven to be the least
0:18:45 violent people in the world in terms of
0:18:46 religion why
0:18:48 and this gotta sound ridiculous some
0:18:50 guys laughing the head off in a home
0:18:52 there believe me but if you count the
0:18:55 amount of people that have died as a
0:18:56 result of the imperialistic Wars or
0:18:58 world war one world war two also if you
0:19:00 count the full Wars of America and if we
0:19:02 consider state violence as a kind of
0:19:04 violence which we there's no reason for
0:19:05 us not to we'll come to the conclusion
0:19:08 that the most violent people have been
0:19:09 atheists like Stalin others and
0:19:12 Christians if you consider Hitler or
0:19:15 Christian I don't know why he considered
0:19:16 himself and people like him and so on
0:19:19 and so forth it's not actually for
0:19:21 as reasonably and in the grand scheme of
0:19:24 things as a proportion of the population
0:19:26 especially if we talk about the colonial
0:19:28 period because most of the Muslim world
0:19:29 was subjugated under the colonial or
0:19:32 western wall it fairs actually quite
0:19:34 well but having said that because of the
0:19:37 kind of the post Cold War terroristic
0:19:39 backlash that we've been getting and the
0:19:42 the focus on terrorism so a lot of
0:19:45 people now will think of Islam as a
0:19:47 violent religion but we shouldn't think
0:19:50 just looking at the raw data of Islam as
0:19:52 any more or less violent as of the war
0:19:54 face who have proponents of those days
0:19:57 actually performing more more violence
0:19:59 in the in the span of the last 100 150
0:20:02 years than Muslims but going back to
0:20:05 what I was saying I was saying that look
0:20:07 we have an argument for basically the
0:20:11 the truthfulness of Islam yeah I'm not
0:20:14 gonna lie to you I believed I was going
0:20:16 to be straightforward with you yeah
0:20:18 because I like you you know you're a
0:20:19 nice guy he's dressed well you know I
0:20:21 came here not I didn't even I didn't
0:20:23 even dress properly today you know this
0:20:26 game you know I was gonna I was gonna
0:20:28 come I wasn't gonna come today but I'm
0:20:30 happy I did because I had a conversation
0:20:31 with you yeah listen to me I'm gonna
0:20:35 tell you directly I believe that the
0:20:37 purpose of life is to worship God
0:20:39 through submission not only is that the
0:20:42 case I believe that the guidelines for
0:20:45 human beings is therefore the Quran
0:20:48 because it's the final book for the
0:20:49 reasons I've mentioned so if you want to
0:20:52 live a fruitful life which is in
0:20:53 compliance with the will of God it's got
0:20:56 to be done through the injunctions of
0:20:58 the Quran and the Sunnah now I've given
0:21:02 you the reasons why like I've given you
0:21:04 some more of an epistemological base as
0:21:06 to why we believe in what we believe do
0:21:09 you accept that that epistemological
0:21:11 base I have given you is an argument
0:21:14 which can be accepted or should be
0:21:16 accepted based on the evidences before I
0:21:20 think that unless someone comes up with
0:21:23 a more up-to-date version of truth
0:21:26 the illogic courtroom yes I suppose it
0:21:30 can make sense to accept that as the
0:21:33 most up-to-date fantastic so what we can
0:21:37 do is we can do the Shahadah right now
0:21:40 this adder is the declaration of faith'
0:21:43 now you believe in you believe in what
0:21:45 I've just said you would you agree that
0:21:46 the Quran is probably the Word of God
0:21:48 based on what I've soldiers okay so what
0:21:54 do you do now is you it's good now to
0:21:57 become a Muslim and what the word Muslim
0:21:59 actually means is someone who submits
0:22:00 their will to God as we've said in the
0:22:03 beginning that's the whole point of it
0:22:04 and what I'll do is I'll give you my
0:22:05 number
0:22:06 and then you will discuss more like you
0:22:09 know how to kind of perform your rituals
0:22:12 and these kind of things and get your a
0:22:14 package of things to do in watch and I
0:22:17 will take it easy on you but how do you
0:22:18 feel should go for it and I I wouldn't
0:22:22 call myself not too much already
0:22:23 practicing it's nothing new for me I was
0:22:28 very very much like that yeah would you
0:22:30 like that okay let's do it them so I'm
0:22:32 gonna say an hour but you answer or you
0:22:34 just kind of follow what I say and then
0:22:36 I'll say you in English okay yeah I'll
0:22:39 say never first so follow I say a shadow
0:22:43 yeah I'll say in Arabic and then you say
0:22:45 Ann Arbor and then a English first
0:22:47 yeah okay fine so say a shadow I'll say
0:22:58 that so what you're gonna say is I bear
0:22:59 witness that there's only one God worthy
0:23:01 of worship being submissive to which is
0:23:03 we believe that the God that we cook
0:23:04 yeah and that the Prophet is the final
0:23:06 messenger yeah okay
0:23:08 ash hadu an LA ilaha illallah WA ash
0:23:15 hadu ana muhammadan rasulullah
0:23:25 nice one for the family or friend
0:23:45 so now I'm going to give you my number
0:24:02 off camera a kiss and then you can call
0:24:06 me for anything you need yeah and by the
0:24:08 way we're probably going to get
0:24:08 something to eat afterwards you're
0:24:09 definitely invite today's eat by the way
0:24:11 it's one of the extensions of it so
0:24:13 you're already in a Muslim celebration
0:24:15 all right Yeomans give you my number
0:24:17 I'm very fond of you sorry guys please