Skip to content
On this page

Live with Sapience Institute: Q&A with Imran Hussein & Hamza Tzortzis (2021-12-24)

Description

Live with Sapience Institute: Q&A with Imran Hussein & Hamza Tzortzis

Summary of Live with Sapience Institute: Q&A with Imran Hussein & Hamza Tzortzis

*This summary is AI generated - there may be inaccuracies.

00:00:00 - 01:00:00

, Imran Hussein and Hamza Tzortzis of the Sapience Institute discuss the existence of god, morality, and purpose in the absence of a deity. They discuss how humans can make sense of these concepts without the help of a deity, and how the lack of a creator leads to the potential meaninglessness of life.

00:00:00 Imran Hussein discusses the publication "The Burhan: Arguments for Necessary Being Inspired by Islamic Thought" and how it applies Islamic thought to pastorally difficult arguments. He also discusses the objections that may be raised against the book and how one should read the prevailing mood and assess the available options before attacking.

  • 00:05:00 The Sapience Institute plans to launch a learning platform in December which will include courses on Islam, Christianity, and Marxism. Additionally, the institute plans to launch a podcast and produce videos.
  • 00:10:00 Imran Hussein and Hamza Tzortzis discuss the rationale behind God creating humans and jinn, and how understanding this can help one have a stronger faith.
  • *00:15:00 Discusses how different domains of knowledge can be convinced of the validity of their respective paradigms, even when they don't know everything. He goes on to say that even if we can never know the totality of Allah's knowledge and wisdom, we should still submit to Him because of His great love for us. Finally, the speaker discusses the difference between primary questions and secondary issues, and how to deal with doubts and whispers of doubt.
  • 00:20:00 Hamza Tzortzis and Imran Hussein discuss the philosophical arguments for the existence of God. Tzortzis recommends studying philosophy on an amateur level and having a sound understanding of Islam's creed and practice of praying five times a day.
  • 00:25:00 Imran Hussein and Hamza Tzortzis of the Sapience Institute discuss the five points of Islam that are most important to follow in order to be successful in life. They emphasize the importance of having good spiritual companions, protecting one's heart, having the right intention, and understanding the argument from contingency.
  • 00:30:00 In this Q&A, Imran Hussein and Hamza Tzortzis discuss the existence of god, morality, and purpose in the absence of a deity. They discuss how humans can make sense of these concepts without the help of a deity, and how the lack of a creator leads to the potential meaninglessness of life.
  • 00:35:00 Imran Hussein and Hamza Tzortzis discuss how to approach atheists who may have a lack of understanding of Islamic values and ethics, and the importance of patience in preaching Islam. They also mention the importance of context in assessing whether or not a person is benefiting from Islam.
  • 00:40:00 Ahmed Salaam Alaiikum Ahmed asks about a scholar's statement that when going through difficulty, thank Allah because it could have been worse. He asks for clarification on the concept. The Sapience Institute's Imran Hussein responds that from a spiritual existential perspective, thanking Allah is the best thing that could have happened to the individual.
  • 00:45:00 , Imran Hussein and Hamza Tzortzis discuss the Hebrew story of Moses and the young boy who was killed. The men discuss how Moses could not bear with patience and how it led to him making a number of mistakes. The men also discuss the meaning of the phrase "the universe is made up of nothing."
  • 00:50:00 Imran Hussein discusses why there is something rather than nothing and how this applies to slavery in Islam. He also touches on the different perspectives on slavery in Islam and how it should be discussed.
  • 00:55:00 Imran Hussein discusses the difference between western slavery and Islamic ethics, emphasizing the importance of understanding the social model of Islam. He explains that once slaves understand this, they can break free from their egos and seek to worship only Allah. He suggests a webinar on the topic.

01:00:00 - 02:00:00

Imran Hussein and Hamza Tzortzis of the Sapience Institute discuss the concept of self-evident truths and how they can be used as evidence for the existence of a creator. They also discuss how certain things can be accepted without proof, and how the Qur'an can help uncloud the fitra to allow it to direct itself towards the truth.

01:00:00 Imran Hussein and Hamza Tzortzis discuss intuition and how it can be used as evidence for the existence of a creator. They also discuss how certain things can be accepted without proof.

  • 01:05:00 The Sapience Institute discusses the concept of self-evident truths, which are truths that are true by default and have certain features. They include the idea that time exists, the past was once the present, and a creator exists. These truths are universal and natural, and are not learned or based on social or biological conditions.
  • *01:10:00 Discusses how self-evident truths, such as the existence of a creator, are by default true. It goes on to say that if you reject the creator, you are rejecting all other self-evident truths that exist in western philosophy, in science, and in day-to-day thinking and reality.
  • 01:15:00 Imran Hussein and Hamza Tzortzis of the Sapience Institute discuss the pros and cons of using intuition vs. propositional arguments to believe in God. Hussein points out that many Muslims believe in God by default, and that understanding this direct knowledge is more important than debating the existence of God.
  • *01:20:00 Discusses propositional arguments in the Qur'an and how they can be epistemically valid. It mentions that there is no problem with propositional arguments, but that there are also pro-positional arguments.
  • *01:25:00 Discusses the different functions of the Qur'an's verses, specifically its epistemic and fitra functions. The main point is that the verses can help uncloud the fitra, or "normative natural disposition," to allow it to direct itself towards the truth.
  • 01:30:00 Imran Hussein and Hamza Tzortzis discuss the argument for the existence of God and how time might have begun at the beginning of the universe, if there is an eternal universe.
  • 01:35:00 of the book "Divine Reality: The Evidence" discusses how causality only makes sense with time, and how the universe and its cause occurred at the same time. If the objectors accept that the boundary of the singularity is causingly connected to the rest of the universe, they should also accept the same causal relation when god decided to manifest his will and power to create the universe.
  • 01:40:00 In this Q&A, Imran Hussein and Hamza Tzortzis discuss the argument from existence, causality, and the eternity of material. The brothers had a discussion about the argument and eventually agreed to disagree on the issue.
  • 01:45:00 Imran Hussein and Hamza Tzortzis discuss the perspective that the universe is contingent and has derived its existence from a necessary being. They go on to say that this conclusion philosophically in an abstract sense leads to the idea that there could be other necessary beings, some of which may even be Islamic.
  • 01:50:00 The Sapience Institute is translating a book about the Quran, which will include proof of the Prophet Muhammad's miracle. The book is coming out in January or February, and the author asks for prayers for its success. He advises against worrying excessively about the future, as this can lead to negative mental states. However, he advises being patient and trusting in Allah. He emphasizes that trials and tribulations are part of life, and that they can make us stronger.
  • 01:55:00 Imran Hussein discusses the importance of having a good opinion of Allah, and how it can help during difficult times. He also discusses his experience growing up in a Turkish-speaking community and how it has shaped his views on life.

02:00:00 - 02:05:00

, Imran Hussein and Hamza Tzortzis discuss the philosophy of science in relation to contingent existence. They argue that if every contingent fact is explained by a previous contingent fact, then the present day universe would never have come into existence. Hussein's book "Dying to Believe" explores the meaning of life and is expected to be released soon.

02:00:00 , Imran Hussein and Hamza Tzortzis answer questions from viewers. One questioner asks about the philosophy of science, and the two discuss the concept of contingent existence. They say that one can argue that every contingent fact is explained by a previous contingent fact, but if this goes on forever, we will never have the present day universe.

  • 02:05:00 Imran Hussein's book "Dying to Believe" is a narrative-based book exploring the meaning of life, existentialism, and other topics. It is expected to be released in the next few months.

Full transcript with timestamps: CLICK TO EXPAND

0:00:05 brothers and sisters
0:00:07 and friends
0:00:08 welcome to the sapience institute live
0:00:10 it's me and
0:00:12 brother imran hussain salaam alaikum
0:00:14 salaam
0:00:21 good good so brothers and sisters what
0:00:23 we're going to do is just give you a
0:00:24 quick update and also just provide an
0:00:26 opportunity for you to ask questions
0:00:29 generally about sapience and also about
0:00:32 islamic thought
0:00:33 islamic theo philosophy and if we can't
0:00:36 ask answer the question we will answer
0:00:38 if we can't we'll refer you to someone
0:00:40 who can insha allah
0:00:42 so
0:00:43 just a quick update i believe hopefully
0:00:46 many of you have already seen our new
0:00:48 publication called the burhan in actual
0:00:51 fact if i get in mind if you could just
0:00:53 pass it it's underneath the laptop
0:00:55 there you go
0:00:57 so this is the publication the burhan
0:01:01 arguments for necessary being inspired
0:01:03 by islamic thought this is by muhammad
0:01:05 hijab
0:01:06 and it's around 80 pages
0:01:09 it's
0:01:10 essentially a re-articulation of ibn
0:01:12 sinha's argument for the necessary
0:01:14 existence for
0:01:15 for rajib al-wujud as we say in the
0:01:18 islamic tradition because allah is the
0:01:20 necessary existing being and he is one
0:01:23 he has a will and he is powerful and so
0:01:25 on and so forth and it's a
0:01:26 re-articulation of this argument
0:01:28 in a contemporary
0:01:30 reality in a contemporary sense applying
0:01:32 it in a contemporary
0:01:35 language if you like and it deals with
0:01:37 objections actually in actual fact
0:01:39 chapter five deals with the major
0:01:41 objections
0:01:42 and it also refers to the works of the
0:01:45 11th century theologian al ghazali may
0:01:47 allah have mercy on him and also ibn
0:01:49 tamir the 14th century theologian may
0:01:51 allah have mercy on him as well and
0:01:53 other scholars and
0:01:56 it refers to islamic thought but i think
0:01:57 it's very unique
0:01:59 book
0:02:00 because
0:02:01 what he does hijab applies the arguments
0:02:04 for necessary being
0:02:05 to pastor unapologetic settings and he
0:02:08 uses fictitious characters called
0:02:10 richard and betty and it is quite
0:02:12 powerful and i want to read something to
0:02:14 you
0:02:15 uh concerning the end which is a which
0:02:17 many of you may think is a bit
0:02:19 antithetical to the
0:02:21 muhammad hijab
0:02:23 persona but i think it was very deep and
0:02:25 powerful basically what he says at the
0:02:27 end he says
0:02:28 having said this
0:02:30 we have seen through the hypothetical
0:02:32 scenarios in each chapter that a cold
0:02:35 and rational approach by itself
0:02:37 can never be sufficient
0:02:39 for the atheist detractor to feel truly
0:02:41 comfortable with the arguments presented
0:02:44 they will usually need to feel
0:02:45 comfortable with the person making these
0:02:48 arguments
0:02:49 despite personally being unaware of any
0:02:51 formal psychological studies conducting
0:02:54 conducted on this matter with clearly
0:02:56 defined parameters it is perhaps the
0:02:58 case that past trauma and relationship
0:03:01 difficulties can sometimes be a key
0:03:04 indicator to the theological attitudes
0:03:06 which people have
0:03:07 ironically
0:03:09 sometimes the best way to convince
0:03:11 someone of god is to refrain from
0:03:14 arguing for god's existence
0:03:16 sometimes arguments of detractors need
0:03:18 to be attacked but in other cases it
0:03:20 takes bravery not to attack
0:03:23 pastorally one must read the prevailing
0:03:26 mood and assess the available options
0:03:28 being emotionally and socially
0:03:31 intelligent can sometimes be more
0:03:33 valuable than having the best arguments
0:03:35 civilization has had to offer i think
0:03:38 that was a beautiful end notwithstanding
0:03:41 it's a very robust argument and it's one
0:03:44 of those arguments that doesn't require
0:03:47 any empirical data because it makes a
0:03:49 very powerful argument that anything
0:03:51 that science brings whether it's the
0:03:52 multiverse or any other future type of
0:03:55 scientific conclusion
0:03:56 anything that science brings that
0:03:58 scientific reality
0:04:00 is going to be contingent and when you
0:04:02 read this argument you'll understand
0:04:04 that well if a scientific conclusion or
0:04:05 what it refers to is going to be
0:04:06 contingent then it cannot be provided as
0:04:10 a basis to attack the argument for the
0:04:12 necessary existence of god it's a really
0:04:14 good argument it's a really good piece
0:04:17 you can download it for free on the
0:04:18 sapience institute website if you go to
0:04:21 sapience institute.org forward slash the
0:04:24 burhan and when you go to that link you
0:04:26 could also access the printed copy and
0:04:29 you could purchase the printed copy from
0:04:32 amazon now by the way just to be very
0:04:34 clear we receive no royalties for this
0:04:37 it's literally zero
0:04:38 okay so the cost is the amazon print
0:04:41 price and any other price that they add
0:04:43 to it but we receive zero money from
0:04:45 this we made sure that when it says
0:04:47 royalty we put all zeros right so it's
0:04:50 the print price from that perspective so
0:04:52 you could get a hard copy and you could
0:04:54 download the ebook for free as i repeat
0:04:57 go to sapienceinstead.org forward slash
0:04:59 the burhan so
0:05:01 this is something that's coming up well
0:05:03 that's that we've done also in the next
0:05:05 couple of days brothers and sisters by
0:05:07 the end of december we're also going to
0:05:09 basically launch our learning platform
0:05:12 yes
0:05:13 we're going to launch our learning
0:05:14 platform in sha allah and we're going to
0:05:17 provide the link in due course and the
0:05:19 learning platform's going to have many
0:05:21 courses on there around 12 to 13 courses
0:05:23 so by ramadan you're going to have at
0:05:25 least 12 or 10 to 13 courses on there
0:05:28 but we're going to first launch with
0:05:30 three main courses course number one is
0:05:33 awakening the truth within our advanced
0:05:35 our training course course number two is
0:05:37 no doubt basically 10 effective
0:05:40 strategies on how to do with your doubts
0:05:42 destructive doubts and the doubts of
0:05:43 others and course number three is
0:05:46 awakening the truth within the advanced
0:05:48 our training course in the spanish
0:05:49 language and every week or every 10 days
0:05:52 every couple of weeks we're going to be
0:05:53 releasing a new course so the course
0:05:55 after that i believe is going to be
0:05:57 called the rules of engagement which is
0:06:00 by dr sapphir chaudhary and it's going
0:06:02 to be on how to engage in monadora in
0:06:05 discussions and debate
0:06:07 and debates in the context of the of of
0:06:09 the quran and the sunnah and the islamic
0:06:10 tradition it's going to go through some
0:06:12 logical fallacies critical thinking and
0:06:14 so on and so forth and the ethics of
0:06:17 engaging with other people
0:06:19 and we have so many other courses coming
0:06:20 up we have of course on liberalism we
0:06:23 have two courses on christianity of
0:06:24 course on nihilism we have a course on
0:06:27 feminism coming up and all of this
0:06:29 inshallah is going to be made available
0:06:30 to you so we're going to launch this
0:06:32 month insha'allah with those three
0:06:33 courses
0:06:34 and every couple of weeks so every week
0:06:37 we're going to be releasing another
0:06:38 course so this is and this is all free
0:06:39 by the way this is all free so this is
0:06:42 the kind of like pre-release marketing
0:06:44 that i want to announce uh to you insha
0:06:46 allah also in january releasing a book
0:06:49 in february releasing another book in
0:06:51 march we're releasing
0:06:52 hopefully two books and maybe three so
0:06:55 in total we're going to have so many
0:06:57 free books coming out in sha allah on
0:07:00 different topics concerning christianity
0:07:02 considering the concept of god
0:07:03 concerning doubts concerning the proof
0:07:06 of prophethood and so on and so forth so
0:07:08 alhamdulillah the team have been
0:07:09 extremely busy and there's lots coming
0:07:11 out in sha allah brothers and sisters
0:07:13 and also we're going to be launching our
0:07:15 podcast
0:07:16 in january in sha allah i'm not going to
0:07:18 give you the name not yet we've the name
0:07:21 is being decided we're just working on
0:07:22 the branding now branding now but we're
0:07:24 going to be also launching our podcast
0:07:27 which would also be available on this
0:07:28 channel insha allah as well as that
0:07:31 we're going to be producing lots of
0:07:32 videos for you guys but the main focus
0:07:34 as you know is you know our vision in
0:07:37 sapiens institute is to really see a
0:07:40 world where people receive the message
0:07:41 of islam and that people can share and
0:07:44 educate
0:07:46 people about islam academically and
0:07:48 intellectually and our strategic focus
0:07:50 is based on two main things number one
0:07:52 that sapiens institute itself actually
0:07:54 defends and shares and educates others
0:07:56 about islam intellectually and
0:07:58 academically and we actually develop
0:08:00 others to do so the same so those these
0:08:02 are our two primary key aspects of our
0:08:06 strategy and i'd just like to thank
0:08:08 every single one of you for supporting
0:08:09 us whether whether that's with your own
0:08:11 resources with your dua with your
0:08:13 supplication with your feedback
0:08:15 whatever you've done
0:08:17 i just want to say may allah reward
0:08:19 every single one of you so
0:08:21 i have imran here anyway how are you
0:08:24 good good to see you bro those are some
0:08:25 important updates yes sorry so what
0:08:28 we're going to do is podcast yeah
0:08:30 podcast yeah you're not going to tell us
0:08:31 the name no not yet not yet so what
0:08:34 we're going to do brothers and sisters
0:08:35 we're going to invite some of you on let
0:08:37 me just send you the link
0:08:39 um and then we have imran here
0:08:41 to answer your questions as well in sha
0:08:43 allah
0:08:45 let me just share that link where is it
0:08:47 gone
0:08:48 there you go
0:08:50 so brothers and sisters any of you that
0:08:51 want to come on live to ask some
0:08:54 questions specifically imran because
0:08:56 he's our guest today as well
0:08:58 alhamdulillah please go on to the stream
0:09:01 yard link insha allah and i think since
0:09:04 we have imran here it's very important
0:09:06 to
0:09:08 use his specialism meaning that you know
0:09:10 he's focused on obviously islamic
0:09:12 theology in general but also
0:09:14 concepts concerning existential
0:09:17 realities concepts concerning
0:09:20 nihilism purpose of life
0:09:22 and iran has a forthcoming book coming
0:09:24 as or inshallah which he could talk
0:09:26 about a bit later
0:09:28 so let's get
0:09:31 zafar
0:09:33 parka insha allah to
0:09:46 yes we can
0:09:48 yeah how are you all doing
0:09:50 alhamdulillah good brother how are you
0:09:52 i'm the lamp fine uh i'm sorry if i
0:09:54 sound a bit nervous the first time i'm
0:09:56 coming online
0:09:57 no no you saw my brother mashallah
0:10:01 yes so
0:10:03 this is like one question that i have
0:10:04 had for quite a while like what would
0:10:07 your answer to be
0:10:09 what you what would your answer be to
0:10:10 the question of
0:10:12 what was the reason behind like god
0:10:15 creating humans and jinn as in like not
0:10:19 the answer about like to worship him but
0:10:21 what was the wisdom behind that like god
0:10:23 being
0:10:24 you know uh
0:10:26 all knowing all powerful not needing
0:10:28 anything what was his purpose
0:10:31 to create like beings to test them
0:10:36 like because whenever like most of the
0:10:38 questions
0:10:39 i have an answer to them when asked by
0:10:41 people by other muslims or non-muslims
0:10:44 but then i always have this question
0:10:45 that you know like
0:10:46 uh the world we live in like it's a
0:10:49 world where
0:10:50 like some people are probably not going
0:10:52 to get the perfect message of islam
0:10:54 delivered correctly
0:10:56 people have their own biases people have
0:10:58 their own like uh psychological
0:11:00 limitations
0:11:02 so like why did god decide to test us in
0:11:05 this way like what would your answer to
0:11:07 be that and like just as
0:11:09 like just to clarify
0:11:11 i'm perfectly fine with the answer that
0:11:14 god does what he wills you know lives
0:11:17 alone that we are the ones to be
0:11:19 questioned
0:11:20 but like if you can give a good answer
0:11:22 to this it would really help a lot with
0:11:24 my iman so
0:11:27 bro can i ask you can i ask you a quick
0:11:29 question why did you say it would help
0:11:31 with the iman
0:11:33 it would like uh i mean this is one
0:11:36 question that really sometimes like
0:11:38 makes me
0:11:39 kind of
0:11:41 weak i'll i don't know if that's a good
0:11:43 thing to say but like yeah that does put
0:11:45 some doubts into my heart
0:11:47 but
0:11:49 yeah
0:11:52 no no because i the reason i'm asking
0:11:54 brother is because you know on one end
0:11:57 you said that you know it's you
0:11:58 understand that we are the ones to be
0:12:00 questioned and not allah knowing who
0:12:01 allah is
0:12:03 then at the same time you've you've
0:12:04 mentioned that it creates some sort of
0:12:07 agitation or doubt within you so i mean
0:12:11 both can't be completely true at the
0:12:13 same time so i'm trying to understand
0:12:15 you said that it creates doubt is it
0:12:16 does it create doubt because you feel
0:12:19 you need the answer to that question or
0:12:20 is it something else
0:12:23 what i would say is that if i did get
0:12:25 the answer to that i would be more
0:12:27 content with my iman
0:12:30 okay so so
0:12:32 if i was to say to you right now that
0:12:35 allah is the most wise
0:12:38 and we are not
0:12:40 and therefore we may understand some
0:12:42 aspects of
0:12:44 you know this reality we may not
0:12:45 understand it and this is one if i said
0:12:47 to you this is one of those things
0:12:48 that's beyond us or is not a part of the
0:12:50 knowledge that we're given then how is
0:12:53 would that be problematic why i'm trying
0:12:55 to understand why that would that would
0:12:56 be problematic for you
0:13:00 oh
0:13:02 it wouldn't be problematic as such
0:13:05 as i said like i am perfectly fine with
0:13:07 the answer that you know god can do what
0:13:09 he wills but like if i have a better
0:13:11 answer
0:13:12 i would be happy with that okay if we
0:13:14 add to that say god can do what he wills
0:13:16 and god knows everything allah wants
0:13:18 best for us and that also means that
0:13:21 he's given us what we need and if he's
0:13:22 kept something from us then that's best
0:13:24 for us as well so if this
0:13:27 this aspect of knowing why exactly why
0:13:29 allah created us
0:13:31 to test us is something that's not given
0:13:33 to us and we understand that that's
0:13:35 within allah's perfection that's with
0:13:36 allah he's not given us this information
0:13:38 for a reason and that's the wouldn't
0:13:40 that should be sufficient for us knowing
0:13:42 who allah is
0:13:46 yeah that seems fair
0:13:47 yeah because because
0:13:49 i'm not trying to undermine it bro
0:13:51 because a lot of people have this right
0:13:52 and i think one of the reasons people
0:13:53 have this
0:13:54 is because we live in a society which
0:13:56 literally wants to understand everything
0:13:59 right and and this so we have a type of
0:14:01 god complex where we think
0:14:03 that we not only are the most
0:14:05 intelligent
0:14:06 that we've ever been as humanity today
0:14:08 in the 21st century but that we have we
0:14:10 we need to know it's almost there's this
0:14:12 internal i need to know i need to
0:14:14 understand everything but we don't we
0:14:16 don't have the capacity to understand
0:14:18 everything for one
0:14:19 and there really isn't a need to
0:14:21 understand everything like from our
0:14:22 perspective bro
0:14:23 the fact that allah has told us he
0:14:25 created us to worship him and he's told
0:14:27 us that that is the root to success
0:14:30 that's i mean that is what we need to
0:14:32 focus on right because at the same time
0:14:34 we know that allah doesn't need us to
0:14:36 worship him
0:14:37 you know allah allah is free of need
0:14:39 allah wants us to worship him but he
0:14:42 doesn't need us to worship him
0:14:44 right and and he wants us to worship him
0:14:46 because that is the way it's set up
0:14:48 that's the way we will find success and
0:14:50 allah wants us to be successful
0:14:52 this is very powerful bro
0:14:54 i think what iran said was fantastic
0:14:57 very very powerful and it
0:14:59 and we have to understand as well bro
0:15:01 that even when look at the scientific
0:15:03 paradigm when scientists for example
0:15:06 they
0:15:08 love science they respect science they
0:15:11 believe in science they think it's the
0:15:13 best way to understand how the world
0:15:14 works which is perfectly fine
0:15:16 there are some things that they don't
0:15:18 know
0:15:18 and they admit they don't know for
0:15:20 example they are yet to find a link
0:15:22 between the newtonian paradigm and the
0:15:25 quantum reality right the almost
0:15:28 non-negotiable paradigms
0:15:30 they have an unknown there are many
0:15:32 unknowns
0:15:33 but yet they don't throw the baby out
0:15:35 with the bath water and they are still
0:15:36 convinced concerning the scientific
0:15:38 enterprise so when you look at different
0:15:41 domains of knowledge
0:15:44 they are convinced with the particular
0:15:46 domain of knowledge that it's best
0:15:48 placed to answer certain questions
0:15:49 concerning specific phenomena but they
0:15:52 have other questions that they can't
0:15:53 answer and they say well we just don't
0:15:54 know yet or we will never know but that
0:15:56 doesn't now mean that you throw the
0:15:58 whole maybe you know the scientific
0:16:00 enterprise out of the window the other
0:16:02 thing to understand is to focus more
0:16:03 immersion about wisdom
0:16:05 if allah
0:16:06 is and we have a maximal perfect
0:16:10 theology we believe allah's names and
0:16:11 attributes are to the highest degree
0:16:12 possible
0:16:14 so allah has the totality of knowledge
0:16:16 and wisdom
0:16:18 we are not like allah allah says laser
0:16:20 can
0:16:21 there is nothing like allah subhanallah
0:16:22 word to allah we can never
0:16:25 know the wisdom of allah we can unless
0:16:28 he's given us a portion we can never
0:16:30 know the totality of his knowledge of
0:16:31 wisdom why because of who we are we are
0:16:33 contingent limited beings were not
0:16:35 perfect
0:16:36 allah is perfect
0:16:37 he has no deficiency or flaw we have
0:16:40 deficiencies and flaws
0:16:41 so these questions enters the realm of
0:16:44 allah's maximal
0:16:46 knowledge and wisdom is the realm of
0:16:48 that type of knowledge and wisdom that
0:16:50 we cannot access by virtue of our
0:16:51 limitations
0:16:53 and this happens everywhere bro like for
0:16:55 example you know you might be a doctor
0:16:56 right
0:16:58 and
0:16:59 you may never be a doctor
0:17:00 and you have to submit to the authority
0:17:03 of a doctor when they tell you that you
0:17:04 have a particular disease and they give
0:17:06 you some medicine
0:17:07 and this is just a fact of life
0:17:08 sometimes we have to submit to the fact
0:17:11 that there is an authority and we don't
0:17:13 have access to their knowledge because
0:17:14 of our own limitations but we are happy
0:17:16 to submit to that authority by virtue of
0:17:19 who they are if we could do that with
0:17:20 doctors that are limited and contingent
0:17:22 imagine allah subhanahu wa ta'ala who
0:17:24 create the doctor and allah subhanahu wa
0:17:26 talu has maximum knowledge and wisdom
0:17:28 that's the first thing to understand
0:17:30 the second thing to understand which is
0:17:32 something that i've written in the book
0:17:33 the divine reality which you could
0:17:34 download from the sapience institute
0:17:35 website
0:17:37 is i focus on this wisdom aspect but i
0:17:40 also say consider this
0:17:42 allah subhanahu wa ta'ala is
0:17:44 the source of oh goodness and it follows
0:17:46 that he loves good he loves oh goodness
0:17:50 now think about the story that we are
0:17:51 playing out right now
0:17:54 humanity has been created to be tested
0:17:56 and if those who pass the test they're
0:17:58 elevated with regards to the rank to in
0:18:01 terms of spiritual rank beyond the
0:18:03 angels and if we pass this test we have
0:18:06 eternal bliss
0:18:08 in love
0:18:09 and in eternal happiness with the one
0:18:11 that created us this is one of the
0:18:13 greatest good stories ever told
0:18:15 so it follows that since allah is
0:18:18 the social or goodness and he loves all
0:18:20 good then he wanted this story to become
0:18:22 a reality
0:18:23 so in a way
0:18:25 what we're living out is actually a
0:18:27 manifestation of allah's names and
0:18:29 attributes so it's like for example an
0:18:31 artist and i'm not making an analogy
0:18:34 because there is no analogy with allah
0:18:35 subhanahu wa ta'ala but by greater
0:18:38 reason it's an a fotura argument so
0:18:40 think about this an artist
0:18:43 he is inevitably if he has the
0:18:45 attributes of being a good artist he's
0:18:47 inevitably at some point gonna create
0:18:49 some great art
0:18:51 by greater reason allah subhanahu wa
0:18:53 ta'ala is the source of goodness and
0:18:55 he's going to make this good great story
0:18:56 a reality
0:18:58 so that's another way of looking as well
0:19:00 but the best way is what iran said is
0:19:02 allah subhanahu wa ta'ala is the wise he
0:19:05 has the picture bro we just have a
0:19:07 pixelated understanding of reality
0:19:10 and
0:19:12 we would only know a pixelated
0:19:14 understanding by virtue of our own
0:19:15 limitations our cognitive limitations
0:19:17 our physical limitations
0:19:18 and allah said that he create us to
0:19:20 worship him
0:19:22 now
0:19:23 finally just to move on to the next
0:19:25 person there's one question i want to
0:19:26 ask you
0:19:27 if you could never answer this question
0:19:30 does it undermine the fact that allah
0:19:32 exists
0:19:32 doesn't undermine the fact that allah is
0:19:34 worthy of worship does it undermine the
0:19:36 fact that allah is one does it undermine
0:19:38 the fact that the prophet sallallahu
0:19:39 alaihi hussain is the final prophet does
0:19:41 it undermine the fact that the quran is
0:19:44 from allah subhanahu wa
0:19:45 no it doesn't
0:19:46 so you have to in order to deal with
0:19:49 these destructive doubts sometimes or
0:19:50 these whisperings if you want
0:19:52 you need to distinguish between primary
0:19:54 questions and secondary questions or
0:19:56 subsidiary
0:19:57 issues this question is a subsidiary
0:20:00 issue it's one of those questions where
0:20:01 you say even if i couldn't answer it it
0:20:04 doesn't affect the veracity and the
0:20:06 intellectual foundations of islam okay
0:20:09 and that is a good principle to use when
0:20:10 you have questions
0:20:12 sometimes some questions can be answered
0:20:13 some can never be answered and there's
0:20:15 nothing wrong with that in actual fact
0:20:18 not answering this question in my view
0:20:20 is a proof of allah's existence because
0:20:23 if we could always know the wisdom about
0:20:24 everything then what are we really
0:20:26 saying that we have the totality of
0:20:28 knowledge and wisdom that we are
0:20:29 perfectly knowing and wise which is not
0:20:31 the case at all
0:20:32 so
0:20:33 since we're contingent creatures we're
0:20:35 never going to know everything and we
0:20:36 know allah subhanahu wa ta'ala is the
0:20:38 perfect being that has all knowledge and
0:20:40 all wisdom so jazakallah here for that
0:20:41 brother may allah bless you and
0:20:44 let's have someone else now so
0:20:47 let's take
0:20:49 let's take
0:20:51 useful let me just clean up the studio a
0:20:53 bit
0:20:54 there you go
0:20:56 let's have
0:20:58 brother youssef
0:21:10 i can hear you can you hear me
0:21:12 yes we can hear you
0:21:15 uh just just a second i might fix my mic
0:21:18 just one sec
0:21:19 yes
0:21:34 are you ready brother or shall we just
0:21:36 put someone else on it yeah oh yeah
0:21:38 i am just my mic was a little bit
0:21:41 i couldn't hear you for a second my
0:21:43 speaking
0:21:45 how are you guys doing
0:21:46 i'm good how are you
0:21:49 well i'm not allowed
0:21:50 i want to thank you guys for your uh for
0:21:53 your hard work
0:21:54 uh this has been really helpful for me
0:21:56 personally
0:21:57 watching you guys
0:21:59 all your work for the for the people
0:22:00 like it's making a difference for me and
0:22:02 my my my understanding of islam
0:22:08 uh
0:22:08 so i had
0:22:10 like
0:22:11 i didn't have a particular question like
0:22:12 i had a question like uh in general it's
0:22:14 regarding the
0:22:16 like and
0:22:17 there are some
0:22:18 verses
0:22:19 like uh there's one in uh certain and
0:22:22 then they're like versus regarding the
0:22:26 birds like natural natural laws in
0:22:28 general like uh the verse was about like
0:22:31 the birds that fly in the sky
0:22:37 that
0:22:38 they're are
0:22:39 they're floating in the sky like flying
0:22:41 in the sky
0:22:42 due to allah's uh power
0:22:45 so like
0:22:46 when i was thinking about these verses
0:22:48 like so i'm thinking and natural
0:22:51 just like
0:22:52 constructs
0:22:58 there's something wrong with your mic
0:23:00 what i advise you to do
0:23:02 is
0:23:03 stay on the studio
0:23:06 fix the mic or remove your hair
0:23:08 headphones because you're probably using
0:23:09 a bluetooth by the sounds of it
0:23:11 then we'll bring you back on if that
0:23:13 doesn't work just type up your question
0:23:16 on
0:23:17 the question section of the comments and
0:23:19 we'll address it inshallah because at
0:23:20 the moment we didn't get your question
0:23:22 clearly unfortunately my brother yeah
0:23:24 so let's have
0:23:29 hassan
0:23:32 assalamualaikum can you hear me well
0:23:37 okay thank you uh first of all i would
0:23:39 like to thank you for allowing me to
0:23:40 have a question my question is i'm a
0:23:43 beginner student in in philosophy and i
0:23:45 was reading about the arguments which
0:23:48 are which are
0:23:49 which are uh
0:23:51 which are being which which are given in
0:23:54 the proof of the existence of god and i
0:23:56 was particularly very impressed by the
0:23:58 clown cosmological argument and the work
0:24:00 of dr william lane craig so i want to
0:24:03 ask
0:24:04 brother hamza's advice on it that
0:24:07 what does he think about these arguments
0:24:08 and to him and to you hamza which are
0:24:11 the the best arguments philosophically
0:24:13 for the existence of god
0:24:16 and as a student what i should be
0:24:17 looking for more
0:24:19 yes it's a very good question very clear
0:24:21 thank you brother may god bless you so
0:24:22 there's a few things i want to say the
0:24:24 first thing is when the advice that we
0:24:26 give the advice that i specifically give
0:24:29 and
0:24:30 many of the brothers give concerning
0:24:32 philosophy is that you should not study
0:24:34 philosophy on a on an academic level
0:24:37 unless you have four or five things in
0:24:39 place and this is very important to
0:24:40 consider number one
0:24:42 you have a sound appreciation of the
0:24:45 islamic creed
0:24:47 at least a robust
0:24:50 foundation concerning the islamic creed
0:24:52 and understanding of it number two
0:24:55 you pray five times a day and you are
0:24:58 traversing the spiritual path what does
0:24:59 that mean that you do the thicker and
0:25:01 the duas in the morning in the evening
0:25:03 to protect yourself to protect your
0:25:05 heart because remember in the islamic
0:25:07 context
0:25:09 the heart is very profound but it does
0:25:14 and the
0:25:15 intellect is not an abstract mind but
0:25:17 rather it's a function of the heart
0:25:20 so if we protect the heart we're
0:25:21 protecting also our intellectual
0:25:22 faculties as well so it's very important
0:25:24 to traverse that spiritual path secondly
0:25:26 thirdly rather you have good companions
0:25:29 around you
0:25:30 because we are the product of our
0:25:32 environment
0:25:34 number four and this is very important
0:25:36 that you have connection with mainstream
0:25:39 scholars or students of knowledge to
0:25:41 help guide you if you have any issues
0:25:43 and number five which is very critical
0:25:45 you have the right intention
0:25:47 if you don't have these things in place
0:25:49 my advice is do not do it it could be a
0:25:51 means for your destruction okay
0:25:53 and this is very very important to
0:25:55 understand second point is
0:25:57 although i've had my own journey and i
0:25:59 have been inspired intellectually by dr
0:26:02 william craig and others
0:26:04 but i learned things the hard way my
0:26:06 advice is
0:26:08 yes there are robust philosophical
0:26:10 arguments for god's existence whether
0:26:12 it's the calam cosmological argument in
0:26:14 a if you formulate it correctly and so
0:26:16 on and so forth but what i would advise
0:26:19 is because
0:26:20 since
0:26:21 you know where i started around 15 years
0:26:23 ago
0:26:25 things have changed and we have now our
0:26:28 own thinkers and philosophers
0:26:30 in the academic sphere and also online
0:26:34 that you can refer to to have robust
0:26:37 arguments for god's existence or the
0:26:38 veracity of islam
0:26:40 so my advice would be is although i'm
0:26:42 not saying you shouldn't refer to such
0:26:43 people but we have now a growing trend
0:26:47 of our own
0:26:49 brothers who have a scholastic
0:26:51 understanding whether they're academia
0:26:53 formerly or not they're actually
0:26:55 presenting a strong case for the islamic
0:26:58 tradition
0:26:59 now
0:27:00 my view is that one of the strongest
0:27:02 arguments for god's existence is
0:27:04 actually the argument from contingency
0:27:06 if the argument is articulated in the
0:27:09 best way the kalam cosmological argument
0:27:12 although it has its power has certain
0:27:15 shortcomings i don't i'm not saying
0:27:17 intellectual shortcomings but you have
0:27:19 to really defend
0:27:21 one of its premises quite strongly right
0:27:23 like for example that the universe
0:27:25 actually had a beginning
0:27:26 now if you want something that is more
0:27:29 based on first principles as a
0:27:30 metaphysical argument that you don't
0:27:32 that you could transcend and bypass any
0:27:35 empirical data and any scientific um
0:27:37 assumption or scientific conclusion then
0:27:40 i would say you should study the
0:27:43 argument from contingency so for example
0:27:45 i said this in the beginning we have
0:27:47 muhammad hijab's book the burhan which
0:27:49 is a re-articulation of ibn sinha's
0:27:51 argument also referring to al-ghazali
0:27:53 and ibn timmy and others and it's
0:27:55 applied in a contemporary context that
0:27:58 really shows
0:27:59 the veracity of this argument that there
0:28:01 is a necessary being that is one that
0:28:03 has a will that has power and so on and
0:28:05 so forth and you know no matter what
0:28:08 scientific argument comes into play such
0:28:11 as the multiverse whatever the case may
0:28:12 be this argument transcends those type
0:28:16 of
0:28:18 detractions because
0:28:20 all conscience can do is always give you
0:28:22 a conclusion or reality that is
0:28:24 contingent and if you understand this
0:28:26 argument properly ultimately contingent
0:28:28 things cannot explain contingent things
0:28:30 so
0:28:31 i would say it's the argument from
0:28:33 contingency so that would be
0:28:35 my
0:28:37 my my 10 pence on this but we also have
0:28:39 to understand something as well and i
0:28:40 want imran to maybe articulate this as
0:28:44 well is
0:28:46 the whole assumption is that we have to
0:28:47 prove god's existence as well that we
0:28:49 like there are existential
0:28:51 phenomenological spiritual
0:28:54 perspectives that are very very powerful
0:28:57 and always starting from the position
0:28:59 that oh the onus of proof is on us you
0:29:01 have to prove god's existence i think
0:29:03 it's a forced position
0:29:04 and we need to be very careful about
0:29:06 this as well because god's existence is
0:29:08 intuitive and self-evident
0:29:12 yes
0:29:13 it's not it's it's fitry i think you
0:29:15 know in the
0:29:16 hijab's discussion with pearson
0:29:19 uh that's one of the things that came up
0:29:21 right in the beginning like you know
0:29:23 and hijab articulate the fitra as well
0:29:25 it's natural it's fitri
0:29:27 if you even if you're looking from an
0:29:28 existential perspective so if you really
0:29:30 think about our existence as human
0:29:31 beings
0:29:33 we need god
0:29:35 you know to make sense of reality to
0:29:37 make sense of life to make sense of
0:29:38 purpose to make sense of meaning to make
0:29:41 sense of happiness
0:29:42 and all of these things are the
0:29:43 fundamental things that we need to to
0:29:45 live to to express ourselves
0:29:48 far more you know fundamental than
0:29:50 engaging philosophically and enjoying a
0:29:53 a nice you know
0:29:55 uh
0:29:56 you know technical argument for god's
0:29:57 philosophical argument for god's
0:29:58 existence
0:30:00 fundamentally the things we need to that
0:30:02 make us human can only be accounted for
0:30:04 with the existence of god you know in
0:30:06 particularly allah and through as we
0:30:09 understand it through islam
0:30:10 um and this is what people i think this
0:30:12 is another area people should focus on
0:30:13 as well and look at these things
0:30:14 fundamentally you know which is what
0:30:16 makes us human
0:30:17 and what allows us to function as human
0:30:19 beings morality purpose meaning how okay
0:30:23 these are the key things how do we make
0:30:25 sense of these things
0:30:26 with god and without god so you're
0:30:28 saying that we can't make sense of
0:30:29 morality and meaning and purpose in
0:30:31 absence of god no okay
0:30:34 it's it's like you're patching you're
0:30:36 doing patchwork you know this is what
0:30:37 the existentialist philosophers were
0:30:38 doing and unlike the atheists today
0:30:40 where they acknowledged
0:30:42 that okay let's start
0:30:44 by acknowledging there is no ultimate
0:30:45 meaning there is an ultimate purpose
0:30:46 there is no objective morality in the
0:30:48 absence of god if we deny god we don't
0:30:50 have
0:30:50 any claim to these things but then what
0:30:53 they did they spent their time okay
0:30:54 let's try to build that or fill in that
0:30:56 gap the best we can so we can get along
0:30:59 you know and and we should question that
0:31:01 well those that feeling that you did
0:31:03 it's like you know tooth filling you
0:31:05 know when you get a tooth feeling it
0:31:06 falls out it comes out after a while
0:31:07 it's just so filling so
0:31:09 for the brothers and sisters to be a
0:31:11 little bit more informed about this
0:31:13 why is it the case that in absence of
0:31:15 god there is no ultimate meaning
0:31:17 ultimate purpose
0:31:19 or or basis for morality so why is that
0:31:21 the case because when you remove god
0:31:23 then you're essentially saying
0:31:25 everything is a result of
0:31:28 an accidental process
0:31:30 right everything is an accident human
0:31:32 life the world
0:31:34 the universe the physical laws
0:31:36 everything is one big accident it just
0:31:37 somehow fell into place
0:31:40 the problem here is if it's an accident
0:31:42 if it's one big accident then it's
0:31:44 meaningless at bottom it's meaningless
0:31:48 it's just happened but what if we just
0:31:49 make meaning for ourselves well you can
0:31:51 then that's what they said let's make
0:31:52 meaning up you know let's give our
0:31:53 life's importance nietzsche did this you
0:31:55 know he's ubermensch the superman uh the
0:31:58 you know this this developing
0:32:01 developing your character and yourself
0:32:03 after acknowledging that at bottom there
0:32:05 is no no meaning or no purpose to your
0:32:07 life so make up your own meaning
0:32:08 it okay firstly
0:32:11 you have to now all of these ideas you
0:32:12 come up with you should be moral you
0:32:14 should be upright you should do good you
0:32:17 should be just you know and all of the
0:32:19 even if you define the perfect man like
0:32:21 that although he didn't do it like that
0:32:22 i'm just saying if you do that well
0:32:25 one of these ideas that you've come up
0:32:26 with where did you get them from
0:32:29 and even if you can makes somehow claim
0:32:31 you got them from wherever or why do
0:32:33 they matter compared to other ideas such
0:32:35 as being selfish fulfilling your desires
0:32:38 enjoying your life because you only live
0:32:39 once you know why do these set of these
0:32:42 set of ideas have any you know
0:32:44 superiority to these other set of ideas
0:32:46 which to be honest are more in tune with
0:32:48 the way you should be thinking if life
0:32:49 is an accident you only live once that's
0:32:51 that's how you should do it that's how
0:32:53 you should live yeah so what is that
0:32:54 sort of the impetus the driving factor
0:32:57 for you to be moral just upright you
0:32:59 know live a life with purpose why why in
0:33:02 the first place if life at bottom is
0:33:03 meaningless you know they don't they
0:33:05 don't want to address that question and
0:33:06 to make your own meaning up in life is
0:33:08 almost saying let's pretend to have
0:33:10 media it's like children in a playground
0:33:12 where they're just playing uh cops and
0:33:14 robbers right or doctors or nurses it's
0:33:16 like this pretend to have meaning
0:33:18 and what you said was very profound at
0:33:20 bottom because this is very fundamental
0:33:22 because
0:33:23 we have to see where
0:33:24 what is
0:33:25 the reality
0:33:27 of everything what's the basis of
0:33:29 reality and absence of god from a
0:33:30 physicalist point of view it's just all
0:33:32 physical processes which are further
0:33:33 reduced to electrons whizzing around and
0:33:35 those things as you've said so many
0:33:36 times are called blind and unconscious
0:33:39 meaning there is no intentional force
0:33:41 directing them anywhere they're not
0:33:42 aware of themselves aware of anything
0:33:43 outside of themselves so if you out of
0:33:46 those things together how are you going
0:33:47 to get any profound ultimate meaning
0:33:50 why do we value things like justice and
0:33:52 you know uh you know more other moral
0:33:55 sort of ideas that's another interesting
0:33:57 question if we're just an accident
0:33:58 that's come about by these random
0:34:00 physical processes of atoms and
0:34:01 molecules whizzing around why do we you
0:34:04 know innately value these things if
0:34:06 anything that in itself is a sign that
0:34:07 there's something more going on than
0:34:09 just matter emotion you know it's it's
0:34:11 very interesting you know i was watching
0:34:14 very briefly
0:34:15 a podcast with
0:34:17 mike tyson and bill burr he's a stand-up
0:34:20 comedian
0:34:21 i don't advise you to
0:34:24 refer to
0:34:25 that material there's
0:34:28 things that are not in line with islamic
0:34:29 tradition but that clip came up
0:34:32 and
0:34:33 bilber
0:34:34 he seems like a nice guy from what i saw
0:34:36 in the clip and he made a point
0:34:38 concerning he was an atheist right but
0:34:40 when he had children he changed
0:34:43 there must be something more to it than
0:34:44 that right
0:34:45 so experiences as well
0:34:47 open
0:34:48 spiritual and existential philosophical
0:34:51 windows of opportunity that you could go
0:34:52 through to actually start thinking about
0:34:54 things much further but anyway bro so i
0:34:57 know we're going off on a little bit of
0:34:58 a tangent but do you appreciate what
0:35:00 we've said yeah i i do and can i ask a
0:35:03 short follow-up question on that
0:35:06 sure
0:35:07 yeah so uh i'm a scientist and i live in
0:35:09 a multi-cultural environment where i
0:35:11 have many atheist friends and they are
0:35:13 not very educated atheist let's say so
0:35:16 so how should i like be like how should
0:35:19 i deal with them with hikmah
0:35:24 in terms of dawah
0:35:26 just be patient with them
0:35:28 you know you have to as you have you
0:35:30 have to we have to realize that we are
0:35:32 the product of our environment and most
0:35:34 people are atheists today not because
0:35:36 atheism has you know is true or has
0:35:38 strong foundations it just has utility
0:35:41 from a secular perspective it's useful
0:35:43 you know it's in line with the ideas of
0:35:45 modernity it's in line with these post
0:35:47 enlightenment ideas of material progress
0:35:50 it's like what's his name um alistair
0:35:52 mcgrath in his book twilight of atheism
0:35:55 he put it very beautifully he said look
0:35:56 atheism and modernity are two sides of
0:35:58 the same queen
0:35:59 they just you work right it's like
0:36:01 utility so you have to this is the
0:36:03 environment they're grown up in this is
0:36:04 why they believe what they believe so
0:36:05 assume they're ignorant
0:36:07 understand that this context this
0:36:09 environmental context and even if they
0:36:11 come across arrogant or full of
0:36:13 themselves or you know come across as
0:36:14 they've understood life and everything
0:36:16 there is to understand just be gentle
0:36:18 with them
0:36:19 use you know content for example from
0:36:20 divine reality the new book the burhan
0:36:23 and and present these arguments because
0:36:25 it works for them this is the type of
0:36:27 stuff they understand they like this
0:36:28 this this is what appeals to them so
0:36:30 utilize it like we say is one of the
0:36:31 keys to unlock the fitra yes so use
0:36:34 these as keys you know so it's and and
0:36:36 be gentle and you you may realize as you
0:36:39 read in the summary which is really
0:36:40 powerful with the jobs that
0:36:42 you know you may realize in most cases
0:36:45 you give them a very powerful argument
0:36:47 for god's existence and they still
0:36:48 reject it and they have no reason to
0:36:50 reject it and that should be a sign for
0:36:51 you that there's something else going on
0:36:53 it's an emotional underlying emotional
0:36:55 issue that needs to be tackled yeah you
0:36:57 know but at that point you have to have
0:36:58 the
0:37:00 you can say emotional intelligence
0:37:01 awareness
0:37:03 to shift gears and okay
0:37:06 it's intellectual arguments aren't
0:37:07 working because there's some there's
0:37:09 another deeper problem you know and
0:37:11 they're just covering this deeper
0:37:12 problem up with
0:37:14 argumentation and all of this stuff and
0:37:16 then address the deeper problem try to
0:37:17 figure out what is what it why do they
0:37:19 really have a you know disliking towards
0:37:21 god why do they not want to believe in
0:37:23 god and then tackle that fundamental
0:37:25 issue i think what you said about
0:37:27 sabbath is very important because i
0:37:28 think one scholar said
0:37:29 that the basis of all morals in islam is
0:37:33 sabar
0:37:34 and sabha is the basis for all success
0:37:36 in a way because
0:37:38 in order to be successfully disciplined
0:37:40 but to be disciplined you have to have
0:37:41 patience
0:37:42 in order for you to basically have good
0:37:44 morals you have to be patient right
0:37:47 and what's interesting this and we say
0:37:48 this a lot and it's always good to
0:37:50 repeat it the way to approach dao as a
0:37:52 default position always that's this is
0:37:54 the default position if people don't
0:37:56 have this default default position then
0:37:58 the ignorant of islamic ethics this is a
0:38:01 categorical statement i will make right
0:38:03 now one is ignorant of islamic ethics if
0:38:06 their default position is not this and
0:38:08 what is this it's always to be soft and
0:38:10 compassionate that's the default
0:38:12 position we see this with musa
0:38:15 when allah tells him to speak
0:38:20 one of the worst creations
0:38:22 he discusses in his tafsir concerning
0:38:24 this verse and he basically says that if
0:38:26 if musa
0:38:28 moses had to be
0:38:29 softly spoken speak softly and nicely to
0:38:32 pharaoh one of the unjust
0:38:34 creatures that walked on this earth
0:38:37 then
0:38:38 what about speaking to everybody else
0:38:40 default position yeah also
0:38:43 the my two favorite verses concerning
0:38:45 dawah concerning sharing islam surah
0:38:47 salah verses 33 and 34 allah says
0:38:50 says in verse 33 and who is better in
0:38:52 speech and the one who calls to allah
0:38:54 does righteousness and says i am one of
0:38:56 the muslims and verse 34 says good and
0:38:59 evil are not the same repel by that
0:39:01 which is better and between two people
0:39:03 there was enmity would tend to intimate
0:39:04 friendship and this is very difficult
0:39:06 except for the patient allah says so
0:39:08 that's why patience is very important so
0:39:10 our default prison should be that we
0:39:11 repel everything
0:39:13 by that which is better that
0:39:14 say by that which is better means
0:39:17 repelling with what is more virtuous and
0:39:18 what is more beautiful that's the
0:39:20 default position
0:39:21 don't get me wrong what is more virtuous
0:39:24 and what is more beautiful is not always
0:39:26 being nice
0:39:28 but you assess that when you look at the
0:39:30 maslaha and the masada and the context
0:39:34 because our tradition is virtual ethics
0:39:35 we have to understand the social and
0:39:37 moral variables so what i mean by the
0:39:40 context maslah and masada the context is
0:39:43 find out what the reality is don't just
0:39:44 react right
0:39:46 the muslim is the benefits are you
0:39:49 increasing the benefits the
0:39:51 the masada is are you decreasing the
0:39:53 harms muscles are meaning harms so when
0:39:56 it comes to shifting the gear in terms
0:39:58 of how you're going to approach people
0:39:59 if you're going to move away from
0:40:00 compassion if you're going to move away
0:40:02 from forbearance and patience
0:40:04 you should only do that if you
0:40:06 understand the reality the more
0:40:08 variables and you understand what the
0:40:10 maslacha is and the mafsada and
0:40:13 primarily in islamic tradition you have
0:40:15 to decrease the mafsada decrease the
0:40:19 the evil or the suffering or the harms
0:40:22 okay and ideally you should decrease the
0:40:24 harms and increase the benefits if
0:40:25 you're shifting of gear
0:40:28 and you think you understand the context
0:40:30 increases the mass of that increases the
0:40:32 harms
0:40:33 then you shouldn't do it this is the
0:40:35 general rule in terms of examining
0:40:36 ethics and we should really study our
0:40:38 ethical tradition quite deeply
0:40:40 um so yeah
0:40:42 bless you let's move on to somebody else
0:40:45 in sha allah
0:40:47 may allah bless you so
0:40:50 okay
0:40:53 let's have
0:40:57 bear with me
0:40:58 let's have ahmed salaam alaikum ahmed
0:41:02 slowly
0:41:07 uh
0:41:08 oh man it's an honor to be here
0:41:11 uh
0:41:12 so uh the the question that i had was uh
0:41:15 about
0:41:16 i had a small doubt about uh
0:41:18 pre-destination the concept of father
0:41:22 you know uh when i've heard this in the
0:41:25 tradition i think uh it's a statement of
0:41:27 a scholar or someone you can correct me
0:41:29 on that uh what i've heard is that
0:41:32 when we are going through difficulty
0:41:34 i've heard some scholars say that
0:41:37 thank allah because it could have been
0:41:39 worse
0:41:40 and when i hear that i'm like uh
0:41:43 it confuses me a bit i'm like no it
0:41:46 could not have been worse or better
0:41:48 because like this was like this is what
0:41:51 was meant to be this was the weather all
0:41:53 along so
0:41:55 uh
0:41:56 this might be a stupid question but i
0:41:58 would just like to get a clarification
0:42:00 on that if i'm getting it wrong
0:42:06 no
0:42:08 i think the key i think one of the
0:42:09 things is the uh
0:42:11 we should i think they're right we
0:42:13 should thank allah because it could have
0:42:14 been worse because the decree could have
0:42:16 been worse for you like the situation
0:42:18 allah decreed could have been something
0:42:20 worse than what was decreed right so i
0:42:23 don't think there's a problem in
0:42:25 the thing
0:42:26 um yeah yeah i mean from my
0:42:28 understanding allah knows
0:42:30 everything he has full knowledge of
0:42:32 everything he has knowledge of what
0:42:34 could have been and what couldn't have
0:42:35 been right so allah has knowledge of
0:42:38 everything and he decreed for you a
0:42:40 particular thing
0:42:41 it could have been the case that
0:42:43 something else could have been decreed
0:42:44 right so what you're doing is you're
0:42:46 thinking allah subhanahu wa for what he
0:42:48 decreed for you and from a spiritual
0:42:50 existential perspective thanking allah
0:42:54 rather not not just thanking allah but
0:42:56 anything that allah gives you in your
0:42:57 life
0:42:58 you you should believe and understand
0:43:00 that this is the best thing
0:43:02 nothing better for you could have been
0:43:03 chosen right allah has the picture we've
0:43:06 got the pixel so you know imagine you're
0:43:09 seeing an amazing painting but you're
0:43:11 very close up and all you could see is
0:43:13 like one part of the painting and you're
0:43:15 thinking why is it so dark
0:43:17 if only you had the full picture you see
0:43:19 this beautiful painting and this in some
0:43:21 ways analogous to what we're talking
0:43:23 about here right now allah knows what's
0:43:26 best for you
0:43:27 he created you he knows you better than
0:43:29 you know yourself
0:43:30 and whatever allah is giving you is the
0:43:32 best thing that he can give you
0:43:33 especially from the perspective of a
0:43:34 believer and this is something that you
0:43:36 have to have
0:43:37 certainty in
0:43:39 so from that perspective i i think
0:43:41 that's satisfactory it's powerful
0:43:43 because it's not only you should be
0:43:44 grateful that you know it it wasn't
0:43:46 worse than it is but you should be
0:43:47 grateful for the trial that you're going
0:43:49 through because it's best for you you
0:43:51 know it's and that's a very that's
0:43:53 that's a very powerful way of looking at
0:43:54 it because the story muslim
0:43:56 you know you mentioned all the time
0:43:58 that read that story you know
0:44:01 does things that moosa according to his
0:44:04 sharia he doesn't
0:44:06 doesn't make sense from his from that
0:44:07 immediate perspective but it's because
0:44:10 that has knowledge
0:44:11 that allah has given him of you know the
0:44:14 way these dots connect when times
0:44:15 through the passage of time you know and
0:44:17 then he does tell musa islam why he did
0:44:19 the things he did and that's a powerful
0:44:21 thing for us to understand yeah we as
0:44:22 human beings we're limited to serial
0:44:24 time we're experiencing time as it's as
0:44:26 we're moving through it we don't have
0:44:27 access to what's happening tomorrow or
0:44:29 what's going to happen in a year and
0:44:30 that's why sometimes when something
0:44:32 quote-unquote bad happens to us now in
0:44:34 the present
0:44:35 we jump and we think oh my god why is
0:44:37 this happening to me well yeah you won't
0:44:39 know why it's happening to you because
0:44:40 you don't know how it's going to turn
0:44:41 out for the best for you
0:44:43 absolutely so and we should remind
0:44:45 ourselves of this and thank allah
0:44:47 knowing that allah knows best he is the
0:44:49 one that knows past present future
0:44:50 whatever could have been would have been
0:44:52 and he has done this for us because it's
0:44:54 best for us yes so i think i think just
0:44:56 reading
0:44:57 uh chapter 18 verses 65 onwards i
0:45:00 believe
0:45:01 the the
0:45:02 hebrew
0:45:04 story because this actually answers the
0:45:07 question habibi in in some sense
0:45:09 so
0:45:10 allah subhanahu wa to allah says
0:45:16 and found one of our servants and man to
0:45:18 whom we had granted our mercy and whom
0:45:20 we had given knowledge of our own
0:45:22 moses said to him may i follow you so
0:45:24 that you can teach me some of the right
0:45:26 guidance you have been taught the man
0:45:28 said you will not be able to bear
0:45:31 patient to bear with me patiently and
0:45:32 this man is
0:45:35 how could you be patient in matters
0:45:36 beyond your knowledge moses said god
0:45:39 willing you will find me patient i will
0:45:41 not disobey you in any way the man said
0:45:43 if you follow me then do not query
0:45:45 anything i do before i mention it to you
0:45:48 myself they traveled on later when they
0:45:51 got into a boat the man made a hole in
0:45:53 it moses said how can you make a hole in
0:45:55 it do you want to drown its passengers
0:45:57 what a strange thing to do he replied
0:46:00 did i not tell you that you would never
0:46:02 be able to bear with me patiently moses
0:46:04 said forgive me for forgetting do not
0:46:06 make it too hard for me to follow you
0:46:08 and so they traveled on then when they
0:46:10 met a young boy and the man killed him
0:46:12 moses said how can you kill an innocent
0:46:14 person he has not killed anyone what a
0:46:16 terrible thing to do he replied did i
0:46:18 not tell you that you would never be
0:46:20 able to bear with me patiently moses
0:46:22 said from now on if i query anything you
0:46:24 do banish me from your company you have
0:46:26 put up enough from me and so they
0:46:29 traveled on then when they came to a
0:46:31 town and asked the inhabitants for food
0:46:33 but were refused hospitality they saw a
0:46:36 wall that that was on the point of
0:46:38 falling down and the man repaired it
0:46:40 moses said but if you had wish you could
0:46:42 have taken payment for doing that he
0:46:45 said this is where you and i park
0:46:46 company i will tell you the meaning of
0:46:48 the things you could not bear with
0:46:49 patiently the boat belonged to some
0:46:52 needy people who made the living from
0:46:54 the sea and i damaged it because i knew
0:46:56 that coming after them was a king who
0:46:58 was seizing every serviceable boat by
0:47:00 force the young boy had parents who were
0:47:02 people of faith and so fearing he would
0:47:04 trouble them with wicked through
0:47:05 wickedness and disbelief
0:47:07 we wish that their lord should give up
0:47:09 give them another child pure and more
0:47:11 compassionate
0:47:12 in his place the wall belonged to two
0:47:15 young orphans in the town and there was
0:47:17 buried treasure beneath it belonging to
0:47:19 them the father had been a righteous man
0:47:21 so your lord intended them to reach
0:47:23 maturity and then dig up their treasure
0:47:25 as a mercy from your lord i did not do
0:47:28 these things on my own accord these are
0:47:31 the explanations for those things you
0:47:32 could not bear with patience so as imran
0:47:35 rightly said
0:47:36 you know
0:47:38 allah has the totality of knowledge and
0:47:39 wisdom we have fragmentary pieces in the
0:47:41 story of musa and
0:47:43 muslim
0:47:44 you see that
0:47:48 gets musa to reconnect the thoughts by
0:47:49 giving him some of the wisdom that allah
0:47:51 gave him but didn't give to musa
0:47:52 alaihissalam and just think about your
0:47:54 own existence in life just look back
0:47:56 five ten years and trying to connect the
0:47:58 door to like subhanallah i do that a lot
0:48:00 i'm like if this calamity never happened
0:48:03 to me like five six seven eight years
0:48:04 ago
0:48:05 i wouldn't be here today i wouldn't be
0:48:07 in the patient position that i'm in i
0:48:08 wouldn't be giving certain opportunities
0:48:10 maybe i wouldn't have the right state of
0:48:12 being and character to engage in and
0:48:14 address certain issues so
0:48:16 you know as one when i went through some
0:48:18 you know negative period one scholar
0:48:21 said to me he said something like
0:48:24 hamza on the day of judgement you're
0:48:25 gonna ask allah for a thousand of these
0:48:27 events yeah and you know what he's he's
0:48:29 actually true so alhamdulillah bless you
0:48:32 brother so let's have someone else now
0:48:38 let's have
0:48:43 usama
0:48:46 salaam
0:48:56 made up of nothing
0:48:58 is this a
0:49:00 scientific statement
0:49:03 so just to repeat your question you're
0:49:05 saying
0:49:06 the universe
0:49:07 is made up of nothing
0:49:10 is this a scientific statement
0:49:15 no it depends what they mean by nothing
0:49:18 but if you mean by nothing no prior
0:49:20 causal conditions
0:49:22 no prior
0:49:24 cause
0:49:25 no potential
0:49:26 no thing at all then that's not a
0:49:29 scientific thing at all
0:49:31 now if you
0:49:32 mean the kind of popular outdated
0:49:34 atheist cliche that the universe comes
0:49:36 from nothing
0:49:37 well you have to understand
0:49:39 what they mean by nothing so some would
0:49:41 say nothing is the quantum vacuum
0:49:43 because you have subatomic particles
0:49:45 emerging from the quantum vacuum or
0:49:47 particles coming from the quantum vacuum
0:49:48 but the quantum vacuum is not nothing it
0:49:51 is something has a rich structure it
0:49:53 obeys the laws of the universe it is
0:49:55 something physical right and even
0:49:57 lawrence krauss he said a universe from
0:49:59 nothing he is nothing is actually
0:50:01 something because
0:50:03 what he wanted to do he wanted to
0:50:04 address a metaphysical question the
0:50:06 leibniz question which was why is there
0:50:08 something rather than nothing
0:50:10 and nothing traditionally meant no thing
0:50:12 and what kraus said is well what they
0:50:15 meant was traditionally is that there
0:50:17 was no
0:50:18 space time and space
0:50:20 so he wants science to address this
0:50:21 metaphysical question right so he says
0:50:24 well can you remove time and space so
0:50:26 according to him he says when you remove
0:50:27 time and space you still have a reality
0:50:30 and he's called that nothing because
0:50:32 assuming he thinks the classical view of
0:50:34 nothing is no time and space
0:50:36 but when you remove time and space even
0:50:38 in
0:50:39 his own kind of scientific domain of
0:50:40 knowledge and understanding it is still
0:50:42 something so when he's saying
0:50:45 something comes from nothing he's really
0:50:46 saying something is coming from
0:50:47 something because he's talking about a
0:50:50 quantum reality and even he says in his
0:50:52 public lectures that his nothing is
0:50:54 something physical
0:50:56 okay so
0:50:58 which is all kind of bizarre linguistic
0:51:00 gymnastics so
0:51:02 i hope that clarifies so
0:51:05 no it's not a scientific thing to say
0:51:07 that the universe came from nothing
0:51:10 from the perspectives that we've just
0:51:12 said i hope that's clear
0:51:14 my brother
0:51:17 okay
0:51:18 so let's
0:51:21 get someone else on board let's have
0:51:24 you address this one imrania i don't
0:51:26 know what the question is both still
0:51:28 address it anyway
0:51:34 how are you
0:51:39 so my question was uh regarding slavery
0:51:41 in islam
0:51:42 as well as yeah basically slavery in
0:51:44 islam and so like for me i i understand
0:51:48 like why
0:51:49 the way is slowly fizzled out and how in
0:51:51 islam there's also like many pathways
0:51:53 right which encourages us to you know
0:51:55 free slaves there's many it's a very
0:51:57 virtuous act of free slaves and whatnot
0:51:59 but unfortunately a lot of
0:52:00 if i could say ignorant people you know
0:52:02 they ask well how come allah
0:52:04 could have just blessed the the people
0:52:05 of arabia with like a miracle
0:52:08 and then would say like slavery is
0:52:09 abolished like slavery is not allowed to
0:52:11 be practiced and so he would give them
0:52:12 like a miracle for their economy because
0:52:14 like to my understanding that
0:52:16 like slavery had to be slowly fizzled
0:52:18 out because like the economy was built
0:52:19 upon this was built upon slavery
0:52:21 basically and if they were to totally
0:52:23 eliminate that like it would crumble
0:52:24 right so how do i like respond to these
0:52:26 people who say such who you know bring
0:52:28 up such a claim that was my question
0:52:32 yes it's a it's it's a very interesting
0:52:34 it's a very interesting point that you
0:52:35 made as well bro i think there's other
0:52:36 points mentioned that i was i read
0:52:38 something on this a while ago that you
0:52:39 for example if
0:52:40 slavery was to be abolished you know and
0:52:43 that's assuming for a second that the
0:52:45 way slavery is understood in islam is
0:52:46 the same as it was practiced within the
0:52:48 roman empire whatever the case is which
0:52:50 is not the case
0:52:51 um uh but this the scholars also
0:52:54 mentioned that if it was to be removed
0:52:55 immediately there was a this this
0:52:58 psychological uh
0:53:01 submission to this idea of slavery so
0:53:03 the slaves had a certain way of thinking
0:53:05 and if it was removed immediately they
0:53:06 wouldn't be able to function within
0:53:08 society immediately so they had to be a
0:53:09 gradual praise
0:53:10 a process of weaning so that was another
0:53:12 reason they gave for them to sort of
0:53:14 psychologically be in that state to live
0:53:16 as a free person right and there's many
0:53:19 other points i mean to be honest i'm
0:53:20 going to be honest with you this is not
0:53:21 my area and i don't know much about this
0:53:23 but i would say though even just using
0:53:25 the language slavery is very problematic
0:53:28 because
0:53:30 words have vehicles to meaning
0:53:32 and when you use the word slavery
0:53:34 there's a lot of baggage obviously from
0:53:37 a historical perspective concerning
0:53:39 slavery in a western context
0:53:41 i
0:53:42 would argue that we should not use such
0:53:44 language because that language is not
0:53:47 similar we have to make up our own
0:53:49 language especially in the western world
0:53:51 in english discourse
0:53:53 and
0:53:54 use a different term because when i if
0:53:56 you say for example to any normal person
0:53:58 walking down the street there was the
0:54:00 slavery in islam what they're going to
0:54:02 think
0:54:03 they're going to think about you know
0:54:05 the white oppressor
0:54:07 being racist
0:54:08 and enslaving the black people because
0:54:11 they're black and they believe they're
0:54:12 inferior and oppressing them and harming
0:54:14 them and treating them like you know
0:54:16 less than dust right
0:54:18 yeah
0:54:19 so that's my point so when you look at
0:54:21 the the islamic paradigm is totally
0:54:24 different
0:54:25 now as i said this is what my air
0:54:27 expertise initiates perform but it is i
0:54:30 know it's not the same at all because
0:54:32 number one there is no racism you can't
0:54:33 harm people one one of the usury
0:54:36 principles one of the jurisprudential
0:54:38 and ethical principles in islam is there
0:54:40 is no harming and no reciprocating of
0:54:41 harm
0:54:43 right you can't oppress people right
0:54:46 so even just by virtue of our ethics it
0:54:49 just changes the paradigm of that
0:54:50 concept right so you have to really
0:54:53 understand it from a different
0:54:54 perspective and understand it from the
0:54:56 islamic paradigm and not just listen to
0:54:59 an english word and use it to describe
0:55:02 what's happening in the islamic
0:55:03 tradition totally different and that's
0:55:05 why i wouldn't even use that word that
0:55:06 word itself is problematic just by
0:55:08 virtue of its historical and
0:55:11 linguistic connotations
0:55:13 so
0:55:15 i don't have an answer to this question
0:55:17 um
0:55:18 frankly i mean i think there are people
0:55:20 who do have answers to this question i
0:55:22 think
0:55:23 i'm not aware of a
0:55:26 a paper on this but i do think there was
0:55:28 a paper there was a book by jonathan a.c
0:55:31 brown
0:55:32 yes
0:55:36 that's actually a good book is
0:55:38 recommended i haven't read it myself but
0:55:41 if you access that that will give you
0:55:43 an empowerment that would empower you to
0:55:45 be able to address some of these
0:55:46 questions
0:55:47 but i think one thing you need to do is
0:55:49 number one just from an emotional
0:55:51 perspective get them to realize that
0:55:54 you know it's not the slavery that they
0:55:56 understand from a western perspective
0:55:59 i would not even use the word or the
0:56:00 term slavery yeah focus on the islamic
0:56:04 ethics such as there is no harm no
0:56:05 reciprocating harm you can't oppress
0:56:07 people and so on and so forth
0:56:10 to also understand the kind of social
0:56:12 model from the islamic context
0:56:14 understand how these kind of structures
0:56:16 and societies would work in an ethical
0:56:18 from an ethical perspective
0:56:21 once you understand all of that and
0:56:22 unpack it further then that would
0:56:24 actually get them to realize well
0:56:25 actually it's not the slavery that i
0:56:27 think
0:56:28 it may be and i'm saying this just
0:56:30 intuitively i'm i'm not saying i've
0:56:32 thought about this very well but it may
0:56:33 be equivalent of having you know someone
0:56:37 who's a boss of a business and you
0:56:39 signed a contract because when you sign
0:56:40 a contract you're you're bound to that
0:56:42 contract yeah right especially even in a
0:56:44 western legal framework
0:56:46 and the working class for example yeah
0:56:49 yeah
0:56:50 so
0:56:51 it may be more
0:56:53 more in line with that rather than this
0:56:55 kind of oppressive racist type of slave
0:56:57 of course it's nothing to do with islam
0:56:59 yeah but i would raise another question
0:57:01 as well i would say
0:57:02 once you've unpacked all of that
0:57:05 what you should do is just keep on
0:57:06 focusing on the foundation say well
0:57:09 i've unpacked some of these things for
0:57:11 you so you want to clearly make a
0:57:13 distinction between what happened in the
0:57:15 west and the racism and the oppression
0:57:19 against
0:57:20 the black people
0:57:21 and understanding
0:57:23 the kind of
0:57:24 different hierarchical structures in the
0:57:26 islamic model and you're separating
0:57:27 between
0:57:28 the oppressive slavery that happened in
0:57:31 the west and the
0:57:33 hierarchical structures in the islamic
0:57:34 model and showing the islamic ethics
0:57:36 once you make those two you make them
0:57:38 distinct
0:57:40 then you should say well
0:57:42 i'm here to invite you to actually not
0:57:45 be enslaved to your ego
0:57:47 not to be enslaved to worshipping other
0:57:50 than allah subhanahu wa ta'ala because
0:57:51 that is the greatest slavery of course
0:57:54 greater slavery is that you're a slave
0:57:56 to your hawa to your desires the
0:57:58 greatest slavery is the slavery to your
0:58:01 ego the greatest slavery is the slavery
0:58:03 of
0:58:04 of associate partners with allah we're
0:58:07 here to liberate people
0:58:10 the term
0:58:11 soul in the quran
0:58:13 shares the same root as the word
0:58:16 which means liberty or ease or serenity
0:58:19 so the
0:58:20 soul wants to have that ease and
0:58:23 serenity
0:58:24 but it can only be found in worshiping
0:58:26 allah subhanahu wa ta'ala
0:58:28 you know people's like you know this
0:58:30 western notion
0:58:32 of you know you know people want
0:58:34 absolute freedom and you're noticing
0:58:36 this now with the different ridiculous
0:58:37 ideologies out there removing all types
0:58:39 of hierarchy you know removing even the
0:58:42 idea of family abolishing the family any
0:58:45 structure that's above you is oppressive
0:58:47 by virtue of it just being a structure
0:58:49 or being a hierarchy it's it's frankly
0:58:51 an evil right if you break it it's an
0:58:54 even if you trace these ideas you
0:58:56 sometimes these ideas are found to some
0:58:58 historical european figures that were
0:59:00 evil nasty people yeah honestly
0:59:03 we should do a webinar on this just take
0:59:05 all these modern ideas that are just
0:59:06 like trying to abolish the family and
0:59:09 abolish morality and so on and so forth
0:59:11 and when you trace these ideas
0:59:13 right
0:59:14 you find them
0:59:16 you trace them to somebody european
0:59:17 person that was uh a human being that
0:59:20 you wouldn't even shake hands with right
0:59:21 but anyway that's a story so
0:59:24 uh where was i going with this
0:59:26 um
0:59:27 liberation yeah liberation of the soul
0:59:29 so people you know the search for
0:59:31 absolute freedom really
0:59:33 is yearning for allah because only allah
0:59:36 is absolutely free
0:59:38 allah is absolutely free because he's
0:59:40 the free he's of the independent
0:59:43 everything depends upon him so you know
0:59:45 this yearning in this modern sense in
0:59:47 this modern world that yeah i want to be
0:59:49 free and we're searching for this
0:59:51 absolute freedom is really the fitra and
0:59:53 the soul yearning for allah because only
0:59:56 allah is absolutely free and that
0:59:58 is divinity and people got it wrong so
1:00:01 if you want to be
1:00:02 freed from the shackles of the world
1:00:04 right
1:00:05 then
1:00:06 allah that's what you need to be saying
1:00:07 to people give them that different
1:00:09 paradigm and this reminds very powerful
1:00:11 verse in the quran it's in chapter 39
1:00:14 verse 29 i believe
1:00:16 let me just double check so chapter
1:00:18 39
1:00:20 verse 29
1:00:22 allah says
1:00:25 beautiful very beautiful
1:00:29 god puts forward this illustration
1:00:31 can a man who has for his masters
1:00:34 several partners are odds with each
1:00:36 other be considered equal to a man
1:00:38 devoted holy to one master all praise
1:00:41 belong to god though most of them do not
1:00:43 know so essentially saying who who's got
1:00:46 a better condition the human being that
1:00:48 is enslaved to many masters and they're
1:00:50 all arguing or the human being who's
1:00:52 enslaved to one master
1:00:54 and reality if you're not worshiping
1:00:55 allah you're worshiping something else
1:00:57 either you or other people ideologies
1:00:59 whatever the case may be allah is saying
1:01:01 worship the one that knows you better
1:01:03 than you know yourself that wants good
1:01:06 for you that is the source of goodness
1:01:07 he's
1:01:10 merciful is
1:01:11 he is the loving and so on and so forth
1:01:15 love him connect to him submit to him
1:01:18 yeah and by virtue of who he is so our
1:01:21 job is to really free people from the
1:01:23 slavery of their own selves from being
1:01:25 shackled to other people and ideologies
1:01:27 and world views and shackled to the
1:01:30 desires and to find the
1:01:32 the raha
1:01:33 the
1:01:34 trinity with submitting themselves to
1:01:36 allah wa ta'ala bro does that make sense
1:01:39 yeah it does alhamdulillah i appreciate
1:01:41 that and before i go i just want to say
1:01:42 jazakallah to you and your team at
1:01:43 sapien institute for like all you guys
1:01:45 have done and alhamdulillah a lot of us
1:01:47 have been able to benefit from your
1:01:48 guys's work like we're not able to put
1:01:50 things you know in an articulate manner
1:01:51 like you guys but after listening to you
1:01:53 guys we are so may allah you know accept
1:01:55 all your efforts and bless you guys here
1:01:57 in this dunya
1:02:02 okay so
1:02:06 let's
1:02:07 find more people
1:02:09 so
1:02:10 let's have
1:02:17 take this one imran inshallah
1:02:22 can you hear me
1:02:23 yes we can hear you yes sir i just have
1:02:25 a quick question for either one of you
1:02:27 um it's just it's regarding your
1:02:29 intuition you know one of the arguments
1:02:31 that i've heard
1:02:32 you brothers making regarding the
1:02:35 um
1:02:36 the regarding the proof of their being a
1:02:39 creator
1:02:40 is that one of the main argument is the
1:02:42 intuition that we have
1:02:44 that innately we can you know
1:02:47 we we know that there is a creator
1:02:49 so the question is um
1:02:52 that um how do i put it um
1:02:55 so innately that we know that we have a
1:02:56 creator and there are other things that
1:02:58 we also know innately as well
1:03:01 so the for example one of the one of my
1:03:02 friends have told me um
1:03:04 he asked me a question the atheist
1:03:06 friend he asked me that you know um
1:03:08 regarding the problem of evil and
1:03:10 suffering when a child
1:03:12 when he's young and he's suffering
1:03:15 obviously innately we know that that is
1:03:17 wrong
1:03:18 but the but the question is he asks is
1:03:21 um
1:03:22 but we justify because religion says
1:03:24 that allah has a plan there's a reason
1:03:26 behind the suffering so we need to
1:03:28 justify it through religion
1:03:30 whereas when we talk about allah and
1:03:32 that he exists
1:03:34 we have to undoubtedly without question
1:03:36 believe
1:03:38 without any question that allah exists
1:03:41 so i'm not sure if you can understand my
1:03:42 question but is regarding your intuition
1:03:45 is regarding certain things
1:03:47 and like certain things we just have to
1:03:49 you know without questioning believe it
1:03:51 and there are certain things that you
1:03:53 know we just have to accept without any
1:03:55 proof
1:03:56 and yeah so i'm not sure if i think yeah
1:04:00 um
1:04:03 did you get the question yeah i think
1:04:04 there's two questions okay they're sort
1:04:06 of tied but yeah i think you should
1:04:07 answer the question
1:04:09 about i think referring to the fitra
1:04:11 that the argument we make if we can call
1:04:13 it that that you don't really need
1:04:14 arguments that it's quickly
1:04:16 that's what the brother wanted because
1:04:18 normally the non-muslims will say
1:04:20 yes that's not you just have to believe
1:04:22 without question
1:04:24 well
1:04:25 the argument from
1:04:27 the argument from intuition
1:04:29 is not an argument
1:04:31 that's not what we articulated
1:04:34 it's more of an intellectual position
1:04:36 where we like to take this the the
1:04:39 center of the ring so i like to use
1:04:40 boxing analogies sometimes so you know
1:04:43 when i train with my trainer he used to
1:04:45 say
1:04:45 you know take the center of the ring i
1:04:47 think you should say that to me because
1:04:49 you take the center of the ring you have
1:04:50 more dominance and authority in the ring
1:04:52 rather than being on the ropes right
1:04:54 because you're on the defensive right
1:04:56 although my style was more somehow
1:04:59 passive aggressive i'll take the defense
1:05:01 and you know counter attack yeah that's
1:05:03 my kind of style anyway but with the
1:05:05 standing take the center of the ring so
1:05:06 we will take the intellectual center of
1:05:08 the ring and the way to do that is to
1:05:09 show them look we're not saying there
1:05:11 are no good arguments for god's
1:05:12 existence of course there are but what
1:05:13 we're saying is that the default
1:05:15 position intellectually that you have to
1:05:17 question
1:05:17 [Music]
1:05:19 that you know instead of saying does god
1:05:21 exist you say well what arguments do you
1:05:23 have to reject god's existence
1:05:25 because
1:05:26 the idea of having self-evident truths
1:05:29 is well known in western philosophy
1:05:31 there are many things that we believe to
1:05:33 be self-evidently true so what does
1:05:34 self-evident truth mean a self-evident
1:05:36 truth means that something is true by
1:05:38 default
1:05:39 i'm not saying it's not going to change
1:05:40 let's stand in the possibility it may
1:05:42 change
1:05:43 but it's a default truth okay
1:05:46 so and default truths they also share id
1:05:49 is similar to the ideas of axioms or
1:05:51 assumptions
1:05:53 and and related concepts
1:05:55 but self-evident truths are
1:05:57 truths are as true by default
1:05:59 and they have certain features
1:06:02 excuse me
1:06:03 and they have around three or four
1:06:05 features
1:06:06 that they are
1:06:07 [Music]
1:06:08 they are
1:06:10 sorry they are you want to just put your
1:06:12 mic on mute if you don't mind broke
1:06:14 because we could hear your breathing
1:06:15 sorry all
1:06:16 right so that was slightly off-pointing
1:06:19 there but yeah uh habibi yes so here so
1:06:23 there are certain features of
1:06:24 self-evident truth so the first feature
1:06:26 is that it is untaught okay
1:06:29 what does it mean by its untaught it
1:06:32 means that you don't learn this ultimate
1:06:34 truth by any
1:06:36 from someone external to you you
1:06:39 derive or you acquire this understanding
1:06:42 through your own introspection for
1:06:43 example take the idea of cause and
1:06:45 effect i'm not talking about the nature
1:06:47 of causality but the fact that we have
1:06:49 causes and effects this you you don't
1:06:51 learn
1:06:52 that
1:06:53 that causes have effects and effects
1:06:54 come from causes
1:06:57 at school
1:06:58 right or even the idea that time
1:07:01 exists that the past was a reality the
1:07:04 past was once the present i never went
1:07:06 to school and the teacher told me hamza
1:07:09 you know what happened five days ago
1:07:11 actually happened that time is real that
1:07:14 the past is a reality it didn't exist
1:07:17 you don't learn that at school it's a
1:07:18 self-evident truth it's true by default
1:07:21 you learn that through your own
1:07:23 introspection intuition it's not from
1:07:25 external information transfer so that's
1:07:27 one of the features of a supplement
1:07:28 truth
1:07:29 another feature of a self-evident truth
1:07:31 is that it's universal what does
1:07:32 universal mean it doesn't mean consensus
1:07:35 it means that it's not a product of
1:07:37 specific
1:07:39 social or biological conditions
1:07:41 okay so for example take the idea that
1:07:43 time
1:07:44 exists that the past was once the
1:07:46 present this idea
1:07:49 is cross-cultural it doesn't come from a
1:07:52 specific social biological condition
1:07:54 that we can't trace this idea only from
1:07:57 for example a kenyan village
1:08:00 right no
1:08:01 everyone at different parts of the world
1:08:03 cross-culturally appreciate that the
1:08:06 time that past was once the present okay
1:08:09 so that's another feature of
1:08:11 self-evident truth another feature of
1:08:12 self-evident truth is that it's natural
1:08:15 and intuitive it's natural and intuitive
1:08:18 what does that really mean
1:08:20 that really means that it has greatest
1:08:22 explanatory scope and it answers more
1:08:25 questions than it solves for example
1:08:27 believing that the past was once
1:08:30 the present that the past actually
1:08:32 happened
1:08:33 answers most questions it makes sense of
1:08:36 our understanding of temporal depth of
1:08:38 of time we make sense of our memories it
1:08:40 makes sense of other people's memories
1:08:43 now for you to postulate the opposite
1:08:45 that the past never existed
1:08:48 then that raises far more questions than
1:08:50 it solves so these are the key features
1:08:52 of a self-evident truth
1:08:54 now why have i mentioned this because
1:08:56 the underlying concept of a creator
1:08:59 al-khalif the creator
1:09:02 an uncle's cause for everything that
1:09:04 exists is self-evidently true
1:09:07 the underlying concept of a creator not
1:09:09 allah with his names and attributes fine
1:09:11 that's another argument but the
1:09:13 underlying basis of allah his creative
1:09:16 power
1:09:17 is self-evidently true
1:09:19 it's untold
1:09:21 it's universal and it's natural and
1:09:23 intuitive
1:09:25 why is it untaught because the idea that
1:09:27 things require creator that a book
1:09:29 requires an author that i'm painting
1:09:31 requires a painter these things are not
1:09:34 taught you learn them through your own
1:09:35 intuitive
1:09:37 and your own intuitions and
1:09:38 introspection
1:09:39 also it's universal meaning it's not a
1:09:42 product of a specific social biological
1:09:43 condition or social condition
1:09:45 people all around the world
1:09:47 cross-culturally
1:09:49 irrespective of social or biological
1:09:51 environmental context they know that a
1:09:53 painter that painting requires a painter
1:09:56 that a
1:09:57 a
1:09:58 a a book requires an author and so on
1:10:00 and so forth okay also it's also
1:10:03 intuitive and it's natural meaning it
1:10:05 has great explanatory scope and it
1:10:07 answers most of the questions
1:10:09 it doesn't create more questions than
1:10:11 than it answers so for example to
1:10:14 believe there's a creator for the
1:10:15 universe
1:10:16 that answers most questions if you say
1:10:18 there is no creator then you have a
1:10:19 problem how do the universe come into
1:10:20 existence it doesn't answer that
1:10:22 question
1:10:23 and also for example if we said that the
1:10:25 book has no author
1:10:27 okay well that's that's the problem well
1:10:29 how do all these words come onto the
1:10:30 book right and so on and so forth it
1:10:32 raises far more questions and problems
1:10:34 so from the perspective of self-evident
1:10:36 truths
1:10:37 what we're saying is
1:10:38 that it's true by default
1:10:40 fine you may disagree with it you may
1:10:42 think here's an argument to go against
1:10:43 it fine but at least we have the
1:10:45 intellectual
1:10:47 uh
1:10:49 the intellectual what you call it we're
1:10:50 in the center of the intellectual ring
1:10:52 if you like now we're saying
1:10:54 if you reject god's existence as a
1:10:56 default
1:10:57 it's equivalent of rejecting all other
1:10:59 self-evident truths
1:11:00 that exist in western philosophy exists
1:11:02 in science and in in day-to-day uh
1:11:05 thinking and reality because
1:11:07 self-adventures have certain features
1:11:08 and the underlying concept of a creator
1:11:11 shares these features as well
1:11:13 in other words it's also self-evident
1:11:15 truth if you want to challenge that fine
1:11:17 challenge it but don't say give me proof
1:11:19 of god's existence now the onus of proof
1:11:21 is on you because the one who rejects
1:11:23 the self-evident truth
1:11:25 the onus of proof is on them because if
1:11:27 someone came up to me and said hey hamza
1:11:29 the past doesn't exist
1:11:31 its own illusion the universe was
1:11:33 created with all of your memories five
1:11:34 minutes ago
1:11:36 is the most rational response to say
1:11:39 no you're wrong here's evidence for why
1:11:42 the past is real my memories my
1:11:44 appreciation of temporal depth other
1:11:46 people's memories the history books my
1:11:49 calendar so on and so forth that'll be
1:11:50 an irrational position what i should say
1:11:52 to them is this okay where's your
1:11:54 evidence
1:11:56 right
1:11:57 so likewise if someone rejects the
1:11:59 creator
1:12:00 which is as we've just discussed
1:12:01 self-evidently true true by default then
1:12:04 the onus of proof is on them
1:12:06 so that's what we're trying to discuss i
1:12:08 know i try to summarize a very long
1:12:09 topic but if you go to the sapience
1:12:11 institute website
1:12:12 sapienceinstitute.org forward slash
1:12:15 books you could download the divine
1:12:16 reality and i think it's chapter 3 i
1:12:18 believe it talks about why allah is
1:12:20 self-evidently true and it goes through
1:12:22 these concepts in a little bit more
1:12:23 detail
1:12:24 so hope that that makes sense brother
1:12:26 yeah zakula that did help um i have read
1:12:28 your book many times it's probably my
1:12:31 fourth or fifth time that i'm reading it
1:12:33 and every time i read obviously the more
1:12:36 questions arise so i thought come on
1:12:38 and um ask this question as well just
1:12:40 very quickly before i go you can answer
1:12:42 it if you may um just regarding what you
1:12:44 just said towards the end um
1:12:46 regarding believing in god obviously i
1:12:48 understand it is self-evident it's
1:12:50 universal i've i've heard that there's
1:12:52 there has been um
1:12:53 um
1:12:54 surveys and going on regarding like kids
1:12:57 they're born with that
1:12:59 and
1:12:59 intuitiveness of you know believing in
1:13:01 one god but regarding that just very
1:13:04 quickly that um allah has put in us to
1:13:06 believe in one god he also you know put
1:13:09 in all of us that you know to
1:13:10 acknowledge that murder is wrong rape is
1:13:13 wrong all of these things similarly what
1:13:15 i was just saying before is we also know
1:13:17 that when a child an innocent child
1:13:19 suffers that is also wrong
1:13:21 we all know that that is wrong but when
1:13:23 we see in the world
1:13:25 obviously um
1:13:27 we know it's wrong it's intuitive but it
1:13:29 goes against you know
1:13:31 what we feel we're supposed to just
1:13:32 blindly follow the fact that okay if
1:13:34 allah is you know making them suffer for
1:13:37 a greater good
1:13:38 that intuitive it goes against that um
1:13:42 i don't know how to explain it my friend
1:13:43 explained it better sorry um it just
1:13:46 goes against the fact that
1:13:47 we just have to believe it because our
1:13:49 book says that allah has a great allah
1:13:51 has a you know he has that maximum of
1:13:53 wisdom or totality of wisdom so we just
1:13:56 believe it without question but it goes
1:13:59 against our intuitive nature that it's
1:14:01 wrong that this is happening to the
1:14:03 children
1:14:04 i don't know if i'm able to explain that
1:14:06 part properly
1:14:07 um
1:14:08 but yeah that's my final question that's
1:14:10 the good point
1:14:12 it's wrong from our context that we
1:14:15 understand
1:14:16 the moral variables that are present to
1:14:18 us
1:14:20 i agree
1:14:21 but can we say
1:14:23 it's wrong that allah allowed it to
1:14:25 happen
1:14:27 no you can't of course not why though
1:14:30 this is not blind faith this is because
1:14:31 allah knows all the moral variables he
1:14:34 knows the full reality we don't
1:14:38 do you understand my point because look
1:14:40 there's a difference between absolute
1:14:41 morality and objective morality don't
1:14:44 conflate the two
1:14:46 so absolute morality is that
1:14:49 you know
1:14:51 killing someone is always morally wrong
1:14:54 that's absolute morality
1:14:56 that's an absolute statement that's
1:14:58 actually wrong
1:14:59 because there are some contexts with
1:15:01 certain moral variables that actually
1:15:03 killing someone may be the right thing
1:15:05 to do
1:15:05 for example if someone had a machine gun
1:15:08 and was spraying and shooting all of
1:15:11 these children at school and the only
1:15:13 way possible to stop him is to kill him
1:15:16 then that will probably the most moral
1:15:18 morally right thing to do okay
1:15:20 so
1:15:21 and that is objective in line with those
1:15:24 specific that specific moral context
1:15:27 so we need to be careful about making
1:15:28 absolute moral statements and thinking
1:15:30 that the same as objective statements
1:15:32 they're not always necessarily the same
1:15:34 so when a child suffers yes we know that
1:15:36 is objectively more wrong morally wrong
1:15:39 if if a parent is making a child suffer
1:15:42 that is objectively morally wrong by
1:15:45 understanding the moral variables
1:15:47 present
1:15:48 but does that now follow that a lie is
1:15:51 wrong because he's allowed it to happen
1:15:53 no because he understands the full moral
1:15:57 picture
1:15:58 yes it is objectively more along from
1:16:00 that from that perspective how we
1:16:02 understand it for sure and allah is
1:16:04 saying it's an evil thing to do but in
1:16:07 the grand cosmic scheme of things can we
1:16:10 say allah
1:16:11 is wrong for it happen no because allah
1:16:14 our understanding of the full cosmic
1:16:16 picture is everything is in line with
1:16:19 the good wise
1:16:20 uh the good uh wise purpose of allah the
1:16:23 wisdom of allah
1:16:25 this is our world view that allah allows
1:16:28 everything to happen there is evil yes
1:16:30 there's objective evil and there's
1:16:31 objective good and bad things happen and
1:16:33 suffering happens and yes we could say
1:16:35 they're objectively bad based on those
1:16:37 specific moral variables but in the
1:16:39 grand cosmic scheme of things all of
1:16:41 this is in line with allah's purpose
1:16:43 wise purpose that is good
1:16:46 how that all fits together we don't know
1:16:50 because this is in line with the wisdom
1:16:51 of allah subhanahu wa ta'ala and it's
1:16:53 not blind faith because the way we
1:16:55 understand this is true of revelation
1:16:58 and the way to know allah is through
1:17:00 revelation and we don't blindly submit
1:17:02 to revelation because we reflect on
1:17:04 revelation we reflect on the book of
1:17:05 allah
1:17:07 and we say when i read this book i
1:17:10 conclude that it's from allah and we
1:17:12 also understand
1:17:13 when we reflect on the book of allah
1:17:15 subhanallah water and there are various
1:17:16 arguments we can't expand upon them
1:17:18 right now that this book can only have
1:17:20 come from the one who created the
1:17:22 heavens and the earth
1:17:23 that is not blindly submitting does that
1:17:25 make sense
1:17:27 yeah no absolutely
1:17:34 okay so
1:17:36 let's have
1:17:42 this one for you bro yeah
1:17:44 sure like it's if it's right for me safe
1:17:47 islam
1:17:52 you hear me
1:17:55 thank you thank you very much okay so
1:17:57 i'm quite excited to be with you guys uh
1:18:00 here thank you for giving me the
1:18:02 opportunity i have actually two
1:18:04 um
1:18:05 two points of concern uh two points of
1:18:09 contemplation i want to pose and
1:18:11 for you guys and for
1:18:13 anyone who is watching us uh right now
1:18:16 so
1:18:17 first of all i have to say that i truly
1:18:19 love you guys i truly for the sake of
1:18:21 allah i love all the
1:18:23 uh the team and all the efforts that
1:18:26 you are putting forth uh i have been
1:18:29 watching you for like
1:18:31 two years now and i learned a lot from
1:18:33 from you guys so
1:18:36 kudos uh
1:18:38 aside from that so i want to actually
1:18:40 comment on two main points the first
1:18:42 point is
1:18:43 um
1:18:45 the focus on
1:18:47 propositional arguments
1:18:49 um
1:18:50 as opposed to
1:18:54 you just said that it's not trying to
1:18:56 say but i would for now say that it is
1:18:59 intuitive arguments you know or not or
1:19:02 basically not
1:19:03 maybe not intuitive arguments but
1:19:05 uh the um
1:19:08 the point of the focus on the futura the
1:19:11 um intuitive knowledge the direct
1:19:14 knowledge of allah
1:19:16 what i
1:19:17 mean
1:19:18 by this i would
1:19:19 like to refer to the
1:19:22 debate that
1:19:23 or not the debate the interview that
1:19:25 muhammad hijab and jordan peterson
1:19:29 had and jordan peterson
1:19:31 made the point that
1:19:34 why would you do uh why would you uh
1:19:37 engage in the uh in those propositional
1:19:39 arguments when
1:19:40 you already believe that it is
1:19:44 um correct by default or it is true by
1:19:46 default that god
1:19:48 is one that god exists
1:19:50 and all of that so
1:19:53 um and
1:19:54 later on i watched the
1:19:56 response or the analysis sabor ahmed did
1:19:59 on his channel how all of these
1:20:01 propositional arguments the main point
1:20:04 of them is to uncloud the futra rather
1:20:06 than
1:20:08 yeah it is basically to uncloud the
1:20:10 fitra and
1:20:12 what i would actually like to see and i
1:20:14 would like to know your thoughts on this
1:20:18 there is in our tradition in our
1:20:21 philosophical and intellectual tradition
1:20:23 we actually do have a lot of points
1:20:25 um that are not
1:20:28 propositional per se
1:20:30 but uh that focus on the idea of
1:20:35 this
1:20:36 direct knowledge or
1:20:39 knowledge by presence or this intuitive
1:20:42 knowledge for example the um
1:20:52 in english the the flying man
1:20:54 thought experiment of uh avithinia
1:20:58 or and firaz zahabi in uh some of
1:21:02 uh
1:21:03 some of the interviews he did with
1:21:05 support he also mentioned that and
1:21:07 mentioned how we can know that there is
1:21:10 existence and this existence always
1:21:11 exists
1:21:12 that it is absolute that it is infinite
1:21:16 and he refers to
1:21:21 say god is one god is eternal and so on
1:21:24 and so forth
1:21:26 um and that in my estimation is
1:21:30 like a huge huge point because what that
1:21:33 demonstrates
1:21:34 that that basically demonstrates that we
1:21:37 actually do know that god exists
1:21:40 intuitively just by pointing out that
1:21:43 little thought experiment or that little
1:21:47 idea
1:21:48 right so
1:21:49 my point is
1:21:51 what do you um think about
1:21:54 using this line of reasoning this
1:21:57 i don't know this style that
1:22:00 i personally discovered through uh what
1:22:03 first the heavy uh talks about and um
1:22:08 yeah so to go through this point what do
1:22:11 you guys think about using this style of
1:22:14 argumentation
1:22:16 and this focus in
1:22:18 you know debates in the taoist scene in
1:22:21 general
1:22:24 exactly here bro i'm going to put your
1:22:25 mute because there was some crackling
1:22:27 but inshallah it was going to answer
1:22:28 your question inshallah
1:22:30 well i think the way the way support
1:22:32 covered it is and the way we generally
1:22:34 cover is that the propositional
1:22:35 arguments have a role
1:22:37 they have a place
1:22:38 um
1:22:39 that that doesn't take away from the
1:22:41 fact that we acknowledge
1:22:43 that the belief in allah is fitry it's
1:22:44 natural but we in the dawah you have to
1:22:47 look at it from this perspective that
1:22:48 the dao was communicating the message of
1:22:50 of islam the truth of islam to others to
1:22:53 people to to your society now if we take
1:22:56 into consideration the society that we
1:22:58 live in
1:22:59 they are fond of propositional arguments
1:23:02 in many cases although some people won't
1:23:04 be and in those cases we don't share
1:23:05 propositional arguments um but there are
1:23:08 people that are fond of this type of you
1:23:09 know line of reasoning and they like
1:23:11 propositional arguments and then we
1:23:12 utilize those as he said to awaken the
1:23:14 fitra so to trigger the fitra itself so
1:23:17 it all leads back to the fitra is to get
1:23:19 them to realize that axiomatic position
1:23:21 that we acknowledge as muslims
1:23:23 um
1:23:24 and and that's as simple as it is we
1:23:26 it's
1:23:27 foundationally axiomatically
1:23:29 as we've said the belief in allah is
1:23:31 natural it's there it's fitly every
1:23:33 child is born upon the fitrah but as the
1:23:35 process said that it's his parents that
1:23:37 make him a jew a christian or a fire
1:23:39 worshiper highlighting to us that we
1:23:41 brought if we think about this now is
1:23:43 it's the society the environment of this
1:23:45 child their impacts or clouds and covers
1:23:48 this natural state so it's about
1:23:50 removing these clouds and covers now how
1:23:51 do we do that again in the society that
1:23:53 we live in propositional arguments seem
1:23:56 to be prevalent and people seem to like
1:23:58 them so we use it as a tool right it's
1:24:01 not a replacement if you like for for
1:24:04 our axiomatic position
1:24:06 um yes but then there's pro there's
1:24:07 probably there's no there's no problem
1:24:09 with propositional arguments the quran
1:24:10 has propositional arguments you know
1:24:12 simple arguments like you know who look
1:24:14 when allah says respect upon the heavens
1:24:16 of the earth and who created them you
1:24:18 know so yeah i i think it's also
1:24:20 important to see the epistemic function
1:24:23 of ayats okay
1:24:26 so what are the epistemic function of
1:24:28 ayat in the quran this is a discussion
1:24:30 to be had and inshallah jamie turner is
1:24:33 is actually producing an essay for us
1:24:35 for sapience institute on this topic so
1:24:38 in summary what is
1:24:40 the epistemic nature of verses in the
1:24:42 quran
1:24:43 so when
1:24:44 when when arguments in the quran seem
1:24:46 propositional are they propositional yes
1:24:49 they can have that layer let me give an
1:24:51 example so in the quran allah subhanahu
1:24:54 wa says in chapter 52 verse verses 35 to
1:24:56 36 and did you
1:24:59 did you come from nothing did you create
1:25:01 yourself did you create the heavens and
1:25:02 the earth indeed you have no certainty
1:25:05 now there are two primary functions of
1:25:07 these ayat in a way
1:25:08 the epistemic functions as follows one
1:25:11 function which is not maybe some would
1:25:13 argue not the primary function one
1:25:15 function is to give you a propositional
1:25:17 argument
1:25:18 can something come from nothing can you
1:25:20 have self-creation come something
1:25:22 created be ultimately created by
1:25:23 something else created or is there an
1:25:26 uncreated creator we have these
1:25:27 arguments the divine reality you could
1:25:30 download it for free there's a whole
1:25:31 chapter just on these verses on this
1:25:33 argument but there is another function
1:25:35 of these ayat as well which are to
1:25:37 awaken the fitra so the fitra is then
1:25:39 the norm the the original normative
1:25:42 natural disposition of the human being
1:25:44 there are two main opinions one of the
1:25:46 main opinions is like the fitra is like
1:25:48 a vehicle it directs you towards the
1:25:50 truth but the vehicle gets clouded for
1:25:53 many reasons some of the reasons that
1:25:54 iran cited our job is to uncloud the
1:25:56 fitra to allow the fitra to direct
1:25:59 itself towards the truth
1:26:01 these ayat their function is not
1:26:04 necessarily propositional their function
1:26:06 is to uncloud the vitra to allow it to
1:26:08 continue to direct yourself towards the
1:26:10 truth so the beauty of the quran is that
1:26:12 even when you have quranic verses that
1:26:14 seem propositional they also have a
1:26:17 fitra basis and you would only
1:26:19 understand this if you experience this
1:26:21 for yourself in reality i was in qatar
1:26:24 many years ago i was in a shopping mall
1:26:26 and i was speaking to i think he was a
1:26:28 giant someone from china he had a
1:26:29 business there and he was an atheist i
1:26:32 literally
1:26:34 asked the questions that the quran was
1:26:36 asking
1:26:37 did the universe come from nothing did
1:26:39 it create itself
1:26:40 you know can something create be
1:26:42 ultimately created by something else
1:26:43 created i was giving that kind of
1:26:45 discourse
1:26:46 he was really giving me most of the
1:26:47 answers himself so in that very short
1:26:49 conversation from what i remember he was
1:26:51 an atheist then after
1:26:54 he changed into a skeptic i believe then
1:26:56 after he said yes there must be an
1:26:58 uncreated creator just by virtue of this
1:27:00 type of questioning
1:27:02 did i give him a full propositional
1:27:03 argument no i raised the question
1:27:06 and this ayat or the meaning behind this
1:27:08 ayat had that function which was to
1:27:10 uncloud the fitra
1:27:12 to allow it to direct itself towards the
1:27:14 truth does that make sense
1:27:18 we agree with you from that perspective
1:27:20 um bro uh we're going to meet them very
1:27:21 quickly because you was a lot of
1:27:23 crackling in your thing god bless you
1:27:25 happy bee
1:27:26 um and uh we'll speak to you very soon
1:27:29 so let's take
1:27:30 let's let's kick some people off the
1:27:32 studio people who have already spoken
1:27:34 uh in order to get more people in sha
1:27:37 allah
1:27:38 okay so mr
1:27:41 mr
1:27:43 imran take
1:27:45 alaikum brother
1:27:49 brother abdullah can you hear us
1:27:57 how are you brother
1:28:07 we're good bro what's your question
1:28:15 can you still hear us
1:28:18 oh yes i can hear you can you hear me
1:28:21 yes we can hear you bro do you have a
1:28:22 question
1:28:25 yes i have a question to
1:28:27 brother hamza
1:28:29 hey please bro ask inshallah
1:28:33 brother hamza can you answer one
1:28:36 confusion that i got
1:28:38 although it's not your field
1:28:41 but i may be able to articulate my
1:28:44 questions so that you can understand a
1:28:45 bit of it
1:28:47 so
1:28:49 uh you have read islamic theory
1:28:52 [Music]
1:29:02 uh can you know
1:29:04 yes you have to ask very quickly brother
1:29:06 because if it cuts out again we'll have
1:29:07 to remove you because
1:29:09 the flow so bismillah let's go
1:29:12 okay
1:29:13 so are muslims obligated to
1:29:15 establish a state or something
1:29:22 repeat that question again brother
1:29:31 okay
1:29:32 brother come back on or write write the
1:29:34 question yeah write the question and
1:29:35 come back on and then we'll answer the
1:29:37 question if we can inshaallah okay so
1:29:39 the next question is from
1:29:42 there's a question from for imran please
1:29:45 let's get a question from mustafa
1:30:01 during ramadan you were saying that you
1:30:03 get
1:30:04 collect money for
1:30:06 removing doubts from uh muslim and uh
1:30:09 you block me just for having uh this you
1:30:13 know disagreement from uh with you about
1:30:15 one
1:30:16 uh hadith and i was wondering how you
1:30:19 remove doubts from you know muslims who
1:30:22 have doubt when you just block
1:30:25 a muslim what doesn't have
1:30:28 any doubt about islam and you twice you
1:30:31 actually lied to me about that you gave
1:30:33 said that you give me your email and
1:30:36 phone number but you never did that
1:30:39 okay i'm going to remove this guy again
1:30:41 i don't usually do that this person is a
1:30:43 hadith rejecter
1:30:45 he's someone that has been dealt with
1:30:47 multiple times were very polite to me
1:30:49 ramadan people could access the material
1:30:51 before and with all due respect we're
1:30:54 not going to give him platform to
1:30:55 showcase his views that are problematic
1:30:59 if he wants to be robust he should do
1:31:00 his own videos he should write an
1:31:03 academic piece with references if it's
1:31:05 worthy we're going to address it but
1:31:07 with all due respect to try and hijack
1:31:08 the live stream in this way it's not
1:31:10 befitting of
1:31:12 intellectual academic
1:31:14 adab etika or even rigor
1:31:17 we spoke to him many times we gave him a
1:31:19 lot of platform
1:31:21 and frankly trying to hijack the
1:31:24 the
1:31:25 the the livestream in this way is
1:31:27 unacceptable you should consider the
1:31:29 live stream like our home we've invited
1:31:31 you to our home you're not going to come
1:31:32 to my house and to take the rules
1:31:35 you're not going to come to the house
1:31:36 and start opening the the cupboards and
1:31:38 removing the furniture you need to ask
1:31:41 permission so from that perspective
1:31:43 we need uh we need some adab here just
1:31:46 uh
1:31:47 you know when it comes to him saying
1:31:49 that hamza didn't uh you know give him
1:31:51 this this guy
1:31:52 he he like more than any of us probably
1:31:55 gives people time like this even today i
1:31:57 don't want to say his name but there's
1:31:58 been years this atheist that's been
1:32:00 chasing him he still gives him
1:32:02 time and he told us telling us they
1:32:04 spent some time with him on the messages
1:32:06 a few days ago and he's someone that we
1:32:08 wouldn't probably give any time to so
1:32:10 hamza does give due time to people yeah
1:32:12 and it's if he's if he's blocked him or
1:32:14 he's removed him it's for good reason
1:32:16 yeah yeah sorry i don't want to come
1:32:17 across that i'm like you know uh even
1:32:19 yesterday i was on brother supra's
1:32:20 channel we gave people time but you know
1:32:23 there's so much that you're gonna take
1:32:25 so you're not going to get plus so many
1:32:26 people waiting with genuine yeah there
1:32:28 is there is
1:32:29 one brother said hamza speaking like
1:32:31 hijab laugh out loud it's true sometimes
1:32:33 i do get influenced by by hijab
1:32:37 he is a good influence in many ways mela
1:32:39 preserve him okay so let's get someone
1:32:42 else on let's get
1:32:48 uh sorry do you apologize bear with me
1:32:52 let's get this brother rashad
1:33:00 how are you guys doing
1:33:02 very good bro
1:33:04 how are you
1:33:05 good good
1:33:10 sorry i was just gonna ask did you have
1:33:11 a question for us yes yes uh so i i
1:33:14 think i just have two questions in mind
1:33:16 maybe both of you guys can answer it one
1:33:19 one each uh one was regarding um the um
1:33:23 uh
1:33:24 regarding the uh
1:33:26 argument for the uh existence of god in
1:33:29 terms of going into a cosmological
1:33:31 argument
1:33:32 um
1:33:34 some atheists do mention the idea of uh
1:33:37 where time
1:33:38 time starts
1:33:40 um at the beginning of the universe so
1:33:43 how can you speak about uh time before
1:33:45 what happened before etc so that's one
1:33:48 question and the um you know what let's
1:33:51 let's just do that for now i'm i i'm
1:33:53 doing this for the first time speaking
1:33:55 on live stream so i sort of forgetting
1:33:57 everything but this is good for now
1:34:01 here bro
1:34:02 yeah so with regards to the time
1:34:04 question
1:34:05 so
1:34:06 with regards to the contingency argument
1:34:08 this is not a problem
1:34:10 okay
1:34:10 so because the contingency argument
1:34:12 doesn't postulate doesn't necessarily uh
1:34:15 postulate that the universe had to have
1:34:16 a beginning even if you believe in an
1:34:18 eternal universe which obviously we
1:34:20 don't believe in an islamic discourse
1:34:22 but
1:34:23 hypothetically speaking even if you
1:34:24 believe in eternal universe
1:34:26 which would really remove the idea of
1:34:28 time
1:34:29 or at least the idea of physical time it
1:34:31 doesn't really affect the argument this
1:34:33 this contention this detraction only
1:34:36 affects what you call a cosmological
1:34:38 argument with regards to the calam
1:34:40 cosmological argument or related
1:34:42 arguments because if you postulate a
1:34:44 beginning for the universe and you're
1:34:46 saying whatever begins to exist has a
1:34:47 cause and then you and then someone says
1:34:49 well hold on a second
1:34:52 time began at the beginning of the
1:34:53 universe so outside of the universe
1:34:55 there is no time so cause and effect
1:34:57 doesn't exist because cause and effect
1:34:59 only exists with the idea of time that's
1:35:01 where the detraction is okay so the best
1:35:04 way to do this is just to read an answer
1:35:06 that i wrote in the book right so if you
1:35:08 just pick up my book bro it's
1:35:09 somewhere
1:35:11 somewhere
1:35:11 yeah i think it's the easiest way i
1:35:13 think this is probably one of the the
1:35:15 best answers but you need to understand
1:35:16 this doesn't affect the contingency
1:35:19 argument okay and that's why the
1:35:21 contiguous argument is very very
1:35:22 powerful because any science that you
1:35:24 bring to it or even things to do with
1:35:26 time it transcends that because it's
1:35:28 very it's based on first principles it's
1:35:30 based on the principle of sufficient
1:35:31 region reason and so on and so forth and
1:35:33 as we said previously please uh read
1:35:36 the relevant chapter called the argument
1:35:38 from dependency in this book and read
1:35:40 muhammad hijab's book the burhan which
1:35:42 goes into details and deals with some of
1:35:43 these objections as well
1:35:45 but in terms of the specific objection
1:35:47 that you raised concerning time and
1:35:50 causality i think the best way to do it
1:35:52 is to literally
1:35:54 do a book reading
1:35:55 if you don't mind sir
1:35:57 so just brought with me there he goes
1:36:00 it's called a no on causality time in
1:36:02 the big bang
1:36:03 so
1:36:04 some objectives argue that causality
1:36:06 only makes sense with time they maintain
1:36:09 that since time began at the big bang we
1:36:11 cannot claim something caused the
1:36:13 universe because there was no before at
1:36:16 the beginning of the big bang
1:36:18 in absence of time there is no cause or
1:36:21 effect because cause comes before effect
1:36:25 there are a few problems with this
1:36:27 objection
1:36:28 the view that causality can only make
1:36:30 sense with time requires proof
1:36:32 in philosophy there is no consensus on
1:36:34 the definition on the nature of
1:36:36 causality specifically the nature of the
1:36:38 causal link there are various approaches
1:36:40 that attempt to define and understand
1:36:42 causality and cause relations
1:36:45 one such approach approach is
1:36:46 simultaneous causality
1:36:48 this is the view that causes always
1:36:51 occur simultaneously with the immediate
1:36:53 effects
1:36:54 one could argue that the universe and
1:36:56 its cause occurred at the same time
1:36:59 the following thought experiment
1:37:01 explains such
1:37:02 explain such cause of relation imagine
1:37:04 an eternal ball on an eternal pillow
1:37:07 the ball causes the indentation of the
1:37:10 pillow
1:37:11 but the cause which is the ball does not
1:37:14 come before the effect which is the
1:37:15 indentation of the pillow as time is not
1:37:18 a factor due to the eternality of the
1:37:21 objects in the context of this argument
1:37:24 it could be that the moment god brought
1:37:26 the universe into existence was the
1:37:29 moment the universe came into being this
1:37:31 type of causation is a temporal this
1:37:34 means that the cause in this case god's
1:37:36 will and power occurred prior causally
1:37:39 but not prior temporary not prior in
1:37:41 time the cause and effect occurred
1:37:43 simultaneously another point
1:37:46 this argument assumes that there is a
1:37:49 consensus on the notion of time in
1:37:51 science there are different notions of
1:37:53 time in quantum mechanics and in general
1:37:55 relativity to assume that there is only
1:37:57 one conception of time misrepresents the
1:38:00 literature next point and this is quite
1:38:02 a powerful point this objection is
1:38:05 self-defeating if causality cannot exist
1:38:08 without time then the big bang should be
1:38:10 rejected
1:38:12 given that at the point of the big bang
1:38:13 singularity there was no time but a
1:38:16 boundary to time which is t is equal to
1:38:18 zero time is equal to zero and the
1:38:21 boundary is obviously causally connected
1:38:23 to the rest of the universe
1:38:25 then how can this cause a relation make
1:38:26 sense with more time
1:38:28 if the objectors except
1:38:31 the boundary is causingly connected to
1:38:33 the rest of the universe they should
1:38:35 also accept the same a temporal causal
1:38:38 relation when god decided to manifest
1:38:40 his will and power to create the
1:38:42 universe if they maintain that causality
1:38:44 doesn't make sense outside of time they
1:38:46 will have to reject the causal relation
1:38:49 between the boundary of the singularity
1:38:51 to the rest of the universe which is
1:38:53 tantamount to rejecting the existence of
1:38:55 the universe the objector can argue that
1:38:57 some physicists maintain that the
1:38:59 universe has no boundary this however is
1:39:01 a contentious issue with no consensus
1:39:04 so from this perspective these are three
1:39:06 major points that this detraction is not
1:39:09 a valid detraction so i hope that makes
1:39:11 sense my
1:39:12 brother
1:39:13 sure sure it does brother and i'm i'm
1:39:16 definitely gonna
1:39:17 uh start doing some reading on that i'm
1:39:19 already started with the berhan and
1:39:21 definitely gonna check out divine
1:39:23 reality as well
1:39:25 remember bro when most atheists get to
1:39:27 this level of discussion where they're
1:39:29 talking about things they have
1:39:30 absolutely no clue about none of us have
1:39:31 any clue about in these cases honestly
1:39:34 i'm existing no it shows that they just
1:39:36 fight trying to find excuses any excuse
1:39:37 to deny god so they they rather take
1:39:40 russian into this this sort of
1:39:42 you know fluffy area yeah just to get
1:39:45 away from acknowledging allah i i tell
1:39:47 you a story because at that point it's
1:39:48 theoretical that's true yes whatever the
1:39:51 burden of proof is on them to a certain
1:39:52 extent
1:39:57 and that usually is an indication that
1:39:58 something else is going on i give an
1:40:00 example there was an atheist i think he
1:40:02 came from pakistan he met me at
1:40:03 university in england when i gave a
1:40:04 lecture and i'm paraphrasing the story
1:40:07 he comes up to me and says oh hamza your
1:40:09 argument from
1:40:10 existence doesn't make sense because
1:40:13 causality doesn't make sense outside of
1:40:14 the universe now i could have given him
1:40:17 you know a canton example i could have
1:40:19 given i think as a canton example i
1:40:21 could have showed him that causality is
1:40:22 a plural right it's prior to experience
1:40:25 but what i sensed was that he didn't
1:40:26 know what he's talking about so i said
1:40:28 to him what do you mean by causality and
1:40:30 we had a discussion because in western
1:40:31 metaphysics the notion or the idea of
1:40:34 the cause of relation there is no
1:40:35 consensus on what is the nature of the
1:40:37 cause of relation and you know what he
1:40:38 says to me he says to me i don't know
1:40:41 and i was like hold on a second
1:40:43 they don't know their labels you try to
1:40:46 refute god
1:40:48 by using a term and you don't know the
1:40:50 meaning of that term and i was like
1:40:52 what's going on man
1:40:53 after conversation and being trying to
1:40:55 be nice to him you know what he said to
1:40:56 me
1:40:57 he came from a secular family he didn't
1:40:59 know how to connect to god
1:41:01 oh
1:41:02 yeah yeah well i bless you bro we have
1:41:05 to move on because we're we'll have to
1:41:06 go shortly so we're going to take us
1:41:09 definitely
1:41:12 guys take care love your work
1:41:16 okay so kick from studio
1:41:20 who do we have
1:41:26 we have imran this person jasper
1:41:45 can you guys hear me
1:41:46 [Music]
1:41:47 yes hello hello
1:41:49 can you put your volume down
1:41:51 well
1:41:52 put put
1:41:53 the tv off of the screen after oh he
1:41:56 dropped okay sorry apologies
1:41:58 okay so now now let's take
1:42:03 let's take
1:42:05 ogu's buzz salaam alaikum august boss
1:42:10 [Music]
1:42:24 uh so i have a question about the
1:42:29 recently i had a discussion with a
1:42:31 brother about the eternality
1:42:34 the eternity of of material
1:42:37 and
1:42:38 and i had some reading about it so i
1:42:40 would like i would like to know what
1:42:43 arguments do you use when you get asked
1:42:45 that question because he was saying like
1:42:48 let's say that we didn't know about the
1:42:50 big bang yet
1:42:51 and we are on
1:42:52 ammon atheist in the
1:42:54 time of like 1800s so
1:42:59 what would you like if i said to you the
1:43:01 material is eternal what would you say
1:43:03 in that time
1:43:05 so yeah that's basically the question
1:43:08 yes i mean the easiest way of dealing
1:43:09 with this is sometimes just accept as
1:43:12 many of their propositions as possible
1:43:13 say hypothetically we accept your
1:43:14 position proposition that uh material is
1:43:17 eternal so what
1:43:18 god still exists
1:43:20 it doesn't now mean that god doesn't
1:43:21 exist especially if you use the
1:43:22 contingency argument because the
1:43:24 contingency argument even works with
1:43:26 something like a eternal material
1:43:28 universe because if it's an eternal
1:43:30 material universe it's still contingent
1:43:32 right
1:43:33 so and this is a very powerful argument
1:43:35 because you don't have to start proving
1:43:37 the finite of the universe and so on and
1:43:39 so forth yes there are great arguments
1:43:40 to show that the material material
1:43:42 universe or material stuff cannot be
1:43:44 eternal but that's a different
1:43:45 philosophical discussion but in the
1:43:47 context of god's existence for example
1:43:49 read muhammad hijab's books the quran it
1:43:51 makes a very good case that even if even
1:43:54 not even just hijab's book if it's a bit
1:43:55 too complicated you could start from a
1:43:57 more basic version of the argument which
1:43:59 is from my book chapter
1:44:01 six okay you could download it from the
1:44:03 sap institute website for free and also
1:44:05 download mohammed hijab's book as well
1:44:07 for free
1:44:08 say institute.org forward slash the
1:44:11 the han
1:44:12 and basically what it says is well even
1:44:14 if you had an eternal universe the
1:44:16 eternal universe is still contingent
1:44:18 because it could have not existed based
1:44:20 on the principle of sufficient reason
1:44:22 you could say that well the universe
1:44:24 could have not existed
1:44:25 and also the universe could have
1:44:28 the the the structure of the universe or
1:44:30 the
1:44:31 the the physical makeup of the universe
1:44:33 could have been arranged in a different
1:44:34 way why is it this arrangement and not
1:44:36 another arrangement
1:44:37 there must have been there must be an
1:44:38 external explanation to explain that
1:44:40 particular arrangement over another
1:44:42 arrangement also since the universe
1:44:44 didn't have to exist there's nothing
1:44:45 necessary about its existence
1:44:47 then one could argue well what explains
1:44:50 the fact that it does exist in the first
1:44:51 place it requires an external
1:44:53 explanation to it to explain its
1:44:55 contingent nature
1:44:57 and so on and so forth
1:44:59 and also a material universe from that
1:45:00 perspective can be broken up into pieces
1:45:04 as we know the reality of the structure
1:45:06 and the physical nature of the universe
1:45:08 you could actually remove parts of the
1:45:10 universe hypothetically
1:45:12 if so from that perspective anything you
1:45:14 could add to a remote or remove is
1:45:16 contingent
1:45:18 if it's contingent therefore it must
1:45:20 have derived existence from a necessary
1:45:22 being so even if they postulate a
1:45:24 material universe you don't have to
1:45:26 start to the less
1:45:29 premises that you have to justify the
1:45:30 better just accept it for a moment fine
1:45:32 hypothetically just accept the universe
1:45:34 is eternal so what does it follow that
1:45:36 it's necessary yes a necessary existing
1:45:39 being has to be eternal but
1:45:41 philosophically in an abstract sense
1:45:43 everything eternal is not necessary okay
1:45:46 and this is something very important to
1:45:48 understand and to articulate this
1:45:49 argument further please download the
1:45:51 book the han and if you want a basic
1:45:54 more simpler version go to chapter six
1:45:57 and then you can go to the quran it goes
1:45:58 to straight to the quran depending on
1:46:00 your level of understanding my dear
1:46:02 brother so hopefully i hope that helps
1:46:04 my dear brother
1:46:06 yeah it takes a lot i've probably read
1:46:09 your book more than like three times and
1:46:12 i really enjoy your work
1:46:14 i'm starting to get a trend here some
1:46:15 brother read it five times somewhere
1:46:17 three times maybe
1:46:19 a book
1:46:21 we need a tough sear of the divine
1:46:22 reality
1:46:24 yeah exactly
1:46:33 okay let's get a question for brother
1:46:34 imran
1:46:37 abdullah question for
1:46:50 yes
1:46:52 guys dropped
1:46:54 oh
1:46:57 come back brother
1:47:01 let's have brother uthman
1:47:06 all right salaam
1:47:10 yeah i have a question in regards to in
1:47:12 general when speaking for arguments for
1:47:14 uh islam i've noticed that a lot of the
1:47:16 discourse focus and focuses more on
1:47:18 getting like uh it seems to me more
1:47:20 non-muslim people to believe that
1:47:21 there's just one god like there's like
1:47:23 the cosmicological argument and all
1:47:24 sorts of other arguments but to me it
1:47:27 seems to me i might be wrong but it
1:47:29 seems to me that we
1:47:30 like there is a lot of focus on getting
1:47:33 people to believing that just one god
1:47:35 exists and i don't see the the step the
1:47:38 next step which is proving that it is
1:47:40 like the god of islam that goes to the
1:47:42 quran
1:47:43 and maybe like i don't have exposure to
1:47:46 this but i hope like i was wondering if
1:47:47 you had any plans in the future to make
1:47:49 like a comprehensive
1:47:50 um like you know just break down for how
1:47:53 do we go from believing into just one
1:47:55 like god in terms of that aristotelian
1:47:57 you know this is the kind of definition
1:47:58 to the god of islam allah
1:48:04 in both books i think it's in hamza's
1:48:05 book as well see there's a chapter on
1:48:07 oneness that follows the arguments
1:48:09 and that explains so that the bridge
1:48:11 between
1:48:12 acknowledging god exists and then coming
1:48:14 to terms that god is one and
1:48:15 specifically understanding who that it's
1:48:18 allah and why allah is worthy of worship
1:48:19 yeah absolutely and it's also in the
1:48:21 quran you were mentioning earlier that
1:48:22 is that he mentions okay how do you go
1:48:24 from the idea that there is a cause
1:48:26 to allah well
1:48:28 the
1:48:29 from i remember the quran says this
1:48:30 necessary being then it shows that he is
1:48:33 one he is eternal and has a will however
1:48:36 what this brother is saying is why don't
1:48:38 we start talking about specifically
1:48:40 islamic theism meaning that it is allah
1:48:42 and talk about the quran and why is
1:48:44 worthy of worship
1:48:45 yeah this is a valid point but in in my
1:48:48 book for example chapter 15 there's a
1:48:50 chapter why lies worthy of worship
1:48:52 chapter 14 talks about the proof of
1:48:53 prophethood chapter 13 talks about the
1:48:56 why the quran is from allah so we have
1:48:58 material on this issue
1:49:00 but i would agree with you that more
1:49:02 focus needs to be done concerning
1:49:05 you know why lies worthy of worship in
1:49:07 actual in fact on this channel if you
1:49:08 scroll all the way down there is
1:49:11 a lecture called seven reasons why lies
1:49:14 worthy of worship i believe and we're
1:49:16 going to be producing content on why
1:49:17 lies worthy of worship who allah is and
1:49:20 also the miraculous nature of the quran
1:49:22 which is the focus of
1:49:24 my phd on the concerning the multi-laid
1:49:26 nature of the book of allah subhanahu
1:49:28 wata'ala but much more i agree needs to
1:49:30 be done don't you think
1:49:32 even on a grassroots level you see a lot
1:49:35 of times we would make arguments for
1:49:36 god's existence they acknowledge it and
1:49:38 that we would think that's sufficient
1:49:39 and move on yeah you know so in actual
1:49:42 fact iran was mentioned this just
1:49:43 earlier or before the live stream we're
1:49:45 having this discussion
1:49:46 we have a book coming out that's been
1:49:48 written by i'm not going to say who is
1:49:50 a one of the top leading arab
1:49:53 intellectuals in the world
1:49:55 he wrote a book on the proof of
1:49:56 prophethood it's about 170 000 words we
1:49:59 have the soul rights to translate it and
1:50:02 we have completed the pre-final draft of
1:50:04 the translation it's a phenomenal book
1:50:07 that goes into detail about the miracle
1:50:09 of the quran the proof of the prophet
1:50:11 sallallahu alaihi wasallam so we had a
1:50:13 good knowledge
1:50:14 and it's coming in
1:50:16 inshallah this book should be out
1:50:18 january or february insha allah make dua
1:50:21 thank you thank you very much for the
1:50:22 advice and i really appreciate the work
1:50:24 you've been doing and may allah guide
1:50:26 you to what is best for all of us
1:50:27 inshallah i mean
1:50:30 okay
1:50:37 um i i'm not sure if my question is
1:50:39 fitting for the stream
1:50:41 but i wanted to ask do you have any
1:50:43 advice how to stop
1:50:45 worrying about my the cutter of allah
1:50:48 like the future and
1:50:50 about the tests that allah going to put
1:50:52 you through like
1:50:56 do you understand
1:50:58 like i'm constantly worrying about the
1:51:00 future
1:51:02 will it be uh
1:51:05 will i save my iman and will i
1:51:08 um
1:51:10 how i'm gonna say
1:51:12 like will i make it
1:51:15 uh with my iman intact at the end
1:51:26 a level of concern is good
1:51:28 because it keeps you on your toes right
1:51:30 you we don't want to be in the position
1:51:31 where there's literally no you know
1:51:33 healthy anxiety or concern about you
1:51:36 know how
1:51:37 you know how we're going to end up or
1:51:38 where we're going to end up but it can
1:51:40 very quickly become negative
1:51:42 and and start impacting you negatively
1:51:44 in your day-to-day life which you don't
1:51:45 want to be the case because it defeats
1:51:47 the purpose right
1:51:48 so
1:51:49 a healthy concern
1:51:51 is good and it's a good sign you know
1:51:52 that you're worried about your iman and
1:51:54 you're worried about you know your
1:51:55 sincerity and where you're gonna be
1:51:58 um but
1:51:59 this is where shaytan can creep in and
1:52:01 start making you worry like oh my god
1:52:03 you're going to have tests you're going
1:52:04 to have trials in your life they're
1:52:05 going to be really bad how are you going
1:52:06 to deal with it what you're going to do
1:52:08 as muslims we need to realize allah
1:52:10 wants best for us right even the whole
1:52:14 going through tests and trials and
1:52:16 tribulations in life
1:52:17 you know it's not a bad thing it's
1:52:20 difficult let me let me let's let's
1:52:22 let's be clear about this it's difficult
1:52:24 it's painful you know it's not easy you
1:52:27 know it can really weigh you down
1:52:28 sometimes but as muslims
1:52:31 we we have knowledge that allah has
1:52:32 given us that the non-muslim doesn't
1:52:34 have when a non-muslim faces a test or a
1:52:36 trial or a tribulation
1:52:38 what can they do
1:52:39 it's just it's it actually makes sense
1:52:42 from their perspective they're just
1:52:43 suffering for no reason there is no
1:52:44 meaning behind their suffering it's just
1:52:46 suffering for the sake of suffering and
1:52:48 and they're the ones that should be
1:52:49 anxious to worry about but the funny
1:52:51 thing is they're not worried about these
1:52:53 things you know whereas us muslims where
1:52:55 allah has told us you know trials and
1:52:56 tribulations will come your way but
1:52:58 there's a reason for that you know and
1:53:01 there's many reasons again in the divine
1:53:02 reality there's a whole chapter on you
1:53:04 know evil and suffering and how we make
1:53:06 sense of it from islamic perspective
1:53:07 many reasons you know you grow through
1:53:09 suffering you you have an opportunity to
1:53:11 get closer to allah it's an opportunity
1:53:13 to remove sins you know and and the list
1:53:16 goes on right so
1:53:18 a few things we should start to do is
1:53:19 number one start to
1:53:21 reconceptualize our understanding of
1:53:23 suffering yeah and this doesn't mean
1:53:25 it's not going to be difficult that
1:53:27 we're not going to have a dislike for it
1:53:29 because as human beings we don't like to
1:53:31 suffer right but we have to remind
1:53:33 ourselves this is that internal battle
1:53:34 where you cognitively rationally have to
1:53:36 remind yourself that this suffering
1:53:39 inevitably whether i understand it or
1:53:41 not when i'm going through it that it's
1:53:43 there's good for me in this and that
1:53:44 allah is going to help me and support me
1:53:46 and he's with me and i have to keep my
1:53:47 faith in allah my trust in allah knowing
1:53:49 that inevitably it's going to be good
1:53:51 you know and and just knowing that allah
1:53:53 is with you if you're allah is with the
1:53:55 patient as allah says you know to to
1:53:57 practice patience
1:53:58 you know and again we live in a society
1:54:00 today which has lost the virtue of
1:54:02 patients it's all about this immediate
1:54:03 gratification as soon as we don't get
1:54:05 something it's like we go crazy you know
1:54:08 and it's we it's almost like any slight
1:54:10 suffering we experience we go crazy and
1:54:12 we start blaming we spoil
1:54:14 we're literally spoiled you know so we
1:54:16 have to really recondition ourselves and
1:54:18 remind ourselves that you know we will
1:54:20 go through some tough times in life you
1:54:22 know but allah doesn't you know burden
1:54:23 the soul with more than it can be you
1:54:25 know remind yourself of these realities
1:54:27 and know that allah will help you get
1:54:28 through this
1:54:29 be patient and keep your trust in allah
1:54:32 you know and that's a test of him
1:54:34 life is a test tests are not supposed to
1:54:36 be easy remind yourself when you at
1:54:37 school you know your gcses your your a
1:54:40 levels your universe is never easy you
1:54:42 know you don't want to test no matter
1:54:43 how much you revise for it you don't go
1:54:45 into an examination relaxed
1:54:47 you always you have a sense of anxiety
1:54:49 it's tough but when you when you face it
1:54:51 and you go through it when you come out
1:54:53 on the other side how good you feel you
1:54:55 know you you change yeah as a person i
1:54:57 think it's important it's
1:54:59 very deep
1:55:00 i think his importance would have hosted
1:55:03 good opinion of allah subhanahu wa
1:55:05 ta'ala
1:55:06 you know in the hadith queen when allah
1:55:08 subhanahu wa
1:55:09 says that i am as my servant expects me
1:55:12 to be we translate it as i am as my
1:55:14 servant thinks that i am but it also
1:55:16 means as i am as my seven expects me to
1:55:19 be and if you think
1:55:22 good opinion of allah you'll have
1:55:25 him the good in he'll be bet greater
1:55:27 than any of your expectations also never
1:55:30 lose hope if you're starting to feel
1:55:31 that you're in the in the borderline or
1:55:33 you're going into despair remember
1:55:36 despair
1:55:37 is exactly what shaytan wants
1:55:39 allah doesn't want you to be in despair
1:55:41 in actual fact allah makes it very clear
1:55:43 to not despair of the mercy of allah
1:55:45 subhanallah it's haram
1:55:47 he honestly is haram to despair of the
1:55:49 mercy of allah you know i heard one
1:55:50 score to say you know we hear about
1:55:53 zina is haram drinking is haram doing
1:55:55 this is haram when do people say is
1:55:58 haram to lose hope in the mercy of allah
1:56:00 and his true
1:56:01 is
1:56:02 it is haram he is forbidden he is
1:56:04 blameworthy he is
1:56:06 an evil to lose hope in the mercy of
1:56:09 allah
1:56:10 this is not to belittle someone who is
1:56:12 actually starting to lose hope but is to
1:56:13 remind them that allah wants you to have
1:56:16 hope in him allah is reminding you of
1:56:19 his mercy of his forgiveness of his love
1:56:22 of the fact that he wants best for you
1:56:24 that he wants good for you that no
1:56:26 matter what you've done he always wants
1:56:29 you to turn back always no matter what
1:56:31 you've done no matter what you've done
1:56:33 allah always wants you back so do not
1:56:35 despair in the hope and mercy of allah
1:56:38 this is this is sometimes shaytan uses
1:56:40 our own voice against us to bring us
1:56:42 down to belittle us to make us lose hope
1:56:45 to make us you know think bad of allah
1:56:48 subhana wa to allah
1:56:49 never do that
1:56:51 have hosun
1:56:53 have a good opinion of allah wa ta'ala
1:56:56 and wallahi you will find him in the
1:56:58 greatest of your expectations okay
1:57:00 yeah um
1:57:02 i had a long struggle with the restless
1:57:05 and i still got to work on
1:57:07 it to not affect me on my daily life so
1:57:10 much
1:57:11 but i appreciate the answers and
1:57:15 especially to hamza thank you for the
1:57:18 work you do in the turkish community
1:57:20 because i think we really need it and uh
1:57:24 there isn't
1:57:26 so much um i really appreciate it
1:57:30 are you turkish i'm turkish yes but i
1:57:32 live in germany
1:57:36 you send
1:57:53 what i'm saying is my book has been
1:57:55 translated into turkish it's called
1:57:59 so
1:58:00 um you know if if if you want me to try
1:58:02 and get some copies sent to you so you
1:58:04 can share with your turkish friends just
1:58:06 email us on the sapience website and
1:58:08 we'll try and get back to inshallah okay
1:58:11 yes thank you so much i will contact you
1:58:17 mashallah
1:58:27 we need to wrap things up the reason my
1:58:29 techies is better
1:58:31 is because i was actually brought up
1:58:32 with the turkish community in london in
1:58:34 hackney so a lot of my friends were
1:58:36 kurdish there was turkish and kurds
1:58:38 speak
1:58:39 kurdish but they also speak turkish
1:58:41 depending where they come from so i was
1:58:42 brought up in that community so even
1:58:44 before i became muslim i had you know
1:58:46 really close friends one of them was
1:58:48 like jihan the other one was you know
1:58:50 mere the other one was
1:58:52 uh fatih he was a friend as well you had
1:58:56 who else did we have yeah they're a good
1:58:57 bunch of brothers in actual fact i think
1:58:59 one of my first experiences of listening
1:59:02 and to the meaning of the quran was from
1:59:05 my friend jihan i think i was 14 years
1:59:07 old and he was into computers and i was
1:59:09 at his house and i think he printed out
1:59:11 and he put the film
1:59:13 the
1:59:14 message yeah and it was actually quite
1:59:16 moving and powerful because it was the
1:59:18 verses of
1:59:19 when allah talks about you know the the
1:59:22 young girl that is buried alive and
1:59:24 she's asked for what sin was she buried
1:59:26 you know
1:59:27 it was very very powerful uh chapter of
1:59:29 the quran and and i think remember and i
1:59:32 saw he was he actually had a sense of
1:59:34 iman with it as well
1:59:35 but uh yeah so
1:59:38 yeah so i was brought up with the texas
1:59:39 community i actually learned how to
1:59:42 read turkish uh before before i became
1:59:45 muslim because it's the latin it's it's
1:59:47 latin isn't it um
1:59:49 you know
1:59:50 it's it was it was latinized but anyway
1:59:53 so turkish people are beautiful people
1:59:55 uh they have huge hearts they have a lot
1:59:57 of love a lot of compassion as well
1:59:59 especially for animals if you go to
2:00:01 turkey you see dogs and cats everywhere
2:00:03 and the the the stray and the they're
2:00:05 part of the community like they're part
2:00:06 of the family you have a cat they're
2:00:08 going to one house and another house and
2:00:10 they have and usually have government
2:00:12 vets i think going around checking them
2:00:13 out people give them food and they see
2:00:15 the cats and dogs as part of the
2:00:17 community is actually quite wonderful
2:00:18 and you even see non-muslims commenting
2:00:20 on
2:00:21 uh if you go to youtube and say turkey
2:00:23 loves animals you see like a whole
2:00:25 commentary on this yeah so turkish
2:00:27 people you could tell civilization by
2:00:28 the way it treats its animals
2:00:30 you could tell civilization by the way
2:00:32 it treats women it's children and
2:00:34 animals right usually the more
2:00:36 vulnerable in
2:00:38 these type of cultures and if you see a
2:00:40 lot of compassion for the elderly a lot
2:00:42 of compassion and respect and honor for
2:00:44 women and and honor and compassion for
2:00:46 animals then you know a society is going
2:00:49 right down the right direction and i
2:00:51 know turkey is very ideologically split
2:00:53 at the moment between like the secular
2:00:55 types and the
2:00:56 muslim types but i think these are force
2:00:59 lines everyone is a brother and sister
2:01:01 and everyone is on their own journey and
2:01:03 we just you know be committed to
2:01:04 people's well-being have a lot of rahma
2:01:06 and a lot of hikmah a lot of mercy and
2:01:08 wisdom and try and elevate everybody
2:01:11 together you know drawing these
2:01:12 ideological lines between you know
2:01:14 communities and people on a grassroots
2:01:16 level is is very problematic we should
2:01:19 make things easy for people
2:01:21 talk about glad tidings cooperate with
2:01:23 each other just like the narration of
2:01:24 the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam
2:01:26 when he spoke to mother benjamin
2:01:29 when he went to
2:01:31 yemen
2:01:32 the famous hadith about you know
2:01:34 give the glad tidings the good news
2:01:36 cooperate with each other and so on and
2:01:38 so forth so allah bless you bro
2:01:41 so we'll take one more question
2:01:44 and then we'll have to go uh inshaallah
2:01:48 so we will take a question
2:01:50 from
2:01:52 iman's going to take this
2:01:54 musa brother
2:02:01 how are you brother do you have a
2:02:02 question
2:02:03 uh yes uh i got one question on
2:02:06 eternal universe
2:02:09 like uh i've read hamza santa's author's
2:02:13 book on
2:02:15 like
2:02:16 what
2:02:17 on contingency argument
2:02:19 like he said that eternal universe is
2:02:23 not an issue
2:02:25 so my question is that if there are
2:02:28 contingent uh
2:02:30 things in the universe one could argue
2:02:33 that
2:02:34 uh previous contingent
2:02:36 thing
2:02:37 are explained by
2:02:39 like
2:02:40 these contingent things add infinity
2:02:43 so and the whole chain isn't explained
2:02:46 by
2:02:47 another infinite contingent thing and
2:02:50 add infinitive so what's the issue in
2:02:52 this
2:02:56 brother musa so the brothers talking
2:02:57 about infinite regrets yeah i mean the
2:02:59 infinite regression
2:03:01 my brother is still contingent
2:03:03 based on the president
2:03:05 yeah no my question is yes it is
2:03:07 contingent you are right but one can
2:03:10 argue that
2:03:11 every contingent fact is explained by
2:03:14 previous uh contingent fact that's why
2:03:16 it's not any other way
2:03:18 yes but if you i think you probably
2:03:20 missed it in the book my brother that
2:03:22 one of the key arguments was that you
2:03:24 can't have an infinite regress of
2:03:26 contingent explanations
2:03:28 so if
2:03:29 this contingent universe is explained by
2:03:31 another contingent universe and that
2:03:34 contingent universe derives its
2:03:35 existence or is explained by another
2:03:37 contingent universe and that goes on
2:03:39 forever we will never have the universe
2:03:41 today because if this contingent
2:03:43 universe is as a result of a previous
2:03:46 infinite chain of contingent existences
2:03:50 then you would never have this universe
2:03:51 in the first place because if it's a
2:03:53 forever chain
2:03:54 forever never ends so therefore you
2:03:56 would never have this universe in the
2:03:57 first place
2:03:58 and that's what the book specifically
2:04:00 argues you can't have an infinite
2:04:02 regress of contingent explanations or
2:04:05 contingent existences or one contingent
2:04:08 existence deriving ex its existence from
2:04:10 another contingent existence because if
2:04:12 that goes on forever you will never have
2:04:13 the existence today
2:04:16 okay brother i think
2:04:17 we'll have one more question i want one
2:04:19 question for imran so if the next
2:04:20 question is not frame run
2:04:22 uh then i'm just gonna not answer your
2:04:25 question okay
2:04:27 um
2:04:28 may god bless you brother here so
2:04:31 right so let's take someone who's gonna
2:04:33 ask imran a question
2:04:36 osama
2:04:37 did we have him before i don't remember
2:04:40 i don't think so who saw my question for
2:04:42 imran please
2:04:48 how are you brothers foreign
2:04:54 my question is that how to understand
2:04:56 the philosophy of science
2:05:02 is is that anything with okay so
2:05:07 best
2:05:08 way to understand the f well again going
2:05:11 back to hamza mentioned earlier that you
2:05:13 shouldn't be doubling into philosophy in
2:05:15 general uh unless you have your
2:05:17 foundations good and solid from an
2:05:19 islamic perspective but on the
2:05:21 philosophy of science there's some
2:05:22 there's the book the only small booklet
2:05:25 i read other than the stuff hamza's work
2:05:27 was um it was published by oxford it was
2:05:30 a short introduction to the philosophy
2:05:31 of science
2:05:32 uh
2:05:34 yeah it's a really good nice short
2:05:36 summary um and to be honest he covers
2:05:38 all of the sort of core points you need
2:05:40 anyway um you can always go into depth
2:05:42 on specifics but i think what's in this
2:05:45 sufficient to get started sharla
2:05:54 okay so in mind
2:05:56 please i want you to just basically um
2:05:59 talk about your book
2:06:01 what's in your book
2:06:02 what is it called when do you think it's
2:06:05 going to come out
2:06:06 uh what kind of ideas are in there just
2:06:08 to give people a bit of pre-marketing to
2:06:09 get people to understand that this is
2:06:11 coming out uh obviously you're not
2:06:13 entirely sure how it's going to come out
2:06:14 but just basically discuss it because i
2:06:16 think
2:06:17 it's probably one of the best books that
2:06:19 i'm not saying because you're here one
2:06:21 of the best books are going to come out
2:06:22 in the muslim market in english because
2:06:24 it's done in a very powerful way in in
2:06:26 in the narrative and the style
2:06:29 is actually quite powerful
2:06:31 because it's done from a kind of
2:06:33 actually you explain it so i'm gonna go
2:06:34 brothers and sisters i'll let imran take
2:06:37 over from here and discuss
2:06:38 what his book is called what is the
2:06:40 context why he decided to write in the
2:06:41 way that he did
2:06:42 what kind of concepts are involved maybe
2:06:44 a bit of snip of some of the arguments
2:06:45 and perspectives as for me i've really
2:06:48 thoroughly enjoyed this live stream if
2:06:50 someone could basically time stamp
2:06:52 everything because there were some
2:06:53 really powerful answers i believe some
2:06:54 good interaction my love bless every
2:06:56 single one of you keep in touch with
2:06:57 sapiens institute and i'll leave the
2:06:59 rest to imran in sha allah brother sakib
2:07:02 is going to be joining us
2:07:05 yeah brothers and sisters so just
2:07:07 briefly we don't know where it's coming
2:07:08 out
2:07:09 but the book is called dying to believe
2:07:12 and like hamza said it's a narrative
2:07:13 based so it's uh
2:07:16 similar if i was to give an example if
2:07:17 you've seen and i hope you haven't read
2:07:19 these books but if you have read them
2:07:21 the atheist muslim
2:07:23 richard dawkins book that's called
2:07:26 outgrowing god the style that they've
2:07:28 written their books in which is this
2:07:29 sort of narrative style is a story style
2:07:32 it's something we haven't done much
2:07:34 so this book is going to be in that
2:07:35 style it's going to be about my story
2:07:37 and it's going to specifically focus in
2:07:38 on the meaning of life the purpose of
2:07:40 life
2:07:41 existentialism and all of these types of
2:07:43 topics inshallah um so that will be
2:07:45 probably coming out in the next couple
2:07:48 of months maybe on sapience we don't
2:07:50 know yet it's not confirmed but when it
2:07:52 is out insha alhamsa will let you guys
2:07:53 know
2:07:54 um so that's a little bit about the book
2:07:56 inshallah so we will let you know closer
2:07:58 to the time
2:07:59 uh as we get closer to releasing
2:08:01 inshallah uh and yeah that's it pretty
2:08:03 much i think we'll wrap up now brothers
2:08:04 and sisters may allah bless you guys
2:08:05 jazakallahu for joining us and coming on
2:08:08 this live stream we've been going for
2:08:10 two hours eight minutes alhamdulillah
2:08:12 and i think this is regular so inshallah
2:08:14 we'll be doing more of these until next
2:08:16 time take your brothers and sisters